|| Tutorials home | Decreasing risk | Safety tour | Emergencies | Meteorology | Flight Theory | Communications | Builders guide ||
Safety during take-off and landing
Rev. 3 — page content was last changed January 2, 2005
|Flight Planning and Navigation|
This is an html version of the draft Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority Advisory Circular AC 91-225(0) which was initially circulated, September 2001. This html version omits some material that is not relevant to Ultralight Aviation, the CASRs referred to may not yet be enabled.
Appendix A contents
CASR 91.180 - Precautions before flight [not yet enabled July 2012]
aerodrome means an area of land or water (including any buildings, installations and equipment), the use of which as an aerodrome is authorised under the regulations, being such an area intended for use wholly or partly for the arrival, departure or movement of aircraft.
aircraft landing area (ALA) means a place which may be suitable for the landing and take-off of an aeroplane of appropriate certification and performance but which may not fully meet formal standards of construction, marking, maintenance or reporting.
apron means a defined area on a land aerodrome intended to accommodate aircraft for purposes of loading or unloading, fuelling, parking or maintenance.
clearway means a defined area in which there are no obstacles penetrating a slope of 2.5% rising from the end of the runway over a width of 45m.
demonstrated landing distance (DLD) means an aeroplane?s unfactored landing distance as demonstrated by the aeroplane's manufacturer under a certification process.
factor means a safety margin applied as a multiple to an aeroplane manufacturer's minimum take-off or landing distance data to allow for the variables experienced in normal operations (usually expressed as a percentage).
float plane means any aeroplane designed for landing or taking-off from water.
fly-over area means a portion of ground adjacent to the runway strip which is free of tree stumps, large rocks or stones, fencing or any other obstacles above ground, but which may include ditches or drains below ground level.
landing area means a place which may be suitable for the take-off and/or landing of an aircraft under appropriate conditions.
large aeroplane means an aeroplane over 5700kg MTOW.
lateral clearance area means an area each side of a runway in which obstructions are graded upward away from the runway to reduce wind-shear and provide lateral clearance in the event of divergence from the runway centre-line (see Appendix A, Figure 1).
manoeuvring area means that part of an aerodrome to be used for the take-off, landing and taxiing of aircraft, excluding aprons.
maximum landing weight (MLW) means the maximum weight at which the aeroplane may land or alight.
maximum take-off weight (MTOW) means the maximum weight at which an aeroplane may commence its take-off roll.
movement means the taking off or landing of an aircraft.
movement area means that part of an aerodrome to be used for the take-off, landing and taxiing of aircraft, consisting of the manoeuvring area and the apron(s).
obstacle free area means an area where there are no wires or any other form of obstacles above the approach and take-off areas, runways, runway strips, fly-over areas or water channels.
runway means a defined rectangular area on a land aerodrome which is prepared for the landing and take-off of aircraft.
runway strip means a portion of ground between the runway and fly-over area which is in a condition that ensures minimal damage to an aeroplane which may run off a runway during take-off or landing.
small aeroplane means an aeroplane not more than 5700kg MTOW.
alighting area means a suitable stretch of water for the landing or taking-off of a float plane or amphibian under specific conditions.
5.2 Aircraft performance data is supplied in the Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM), Owners Manual, Pilot's Operating Handbook or an equivalent publication.
5.3 There is no legal obligation on pilots of private aeroplanes below 5700kg to apply safety margins (factors) to the take-off or landing distances recommended by the aeroplane manufacturer. However, the pilot cannot reasonably expect to meet optimum performance standards during normal field operations, and if recommended safety factors are not applied, he or she must accept a greater level of personal responsibility for ensuring that safe runway distances are available in the prevailing circumstances.
*See the standard safety factors recommended for small aircraft at Table 1 to Appendix A.
• an unlicensed landing ground managed by local council or private organisation/landowner
• private farmland
• roads, parks or fairways owned by local authorities or private interests
• water, land or dry lakes managed by a state authority such as National Parks, Waterways Authority, Lands Department, etc.
6.2 Penalties and liability. Use of a public facility such as a road or park for landing may attract a penalty from local authorities even if the physical requirements for a landing area are satisfied. Where land is not actively managed an unauthorised landing might still be considered a trespass. A liability for reckless or negligent operation may also arise if appropriate precautions were not taken to avoid conflict with other users.
6.2.1 While the law generally recognises a person's right to take any reasonable action to save themselves in an emergency, pilots should remember that nothing in the CASRs acts to protect him/her against civil liability in the case of damage to persons or property.
6.3 Pilot responsibilities. The pilot in command has responsibility for the safety of the aircraft and those on board. He or she is required to obtain and assess all the information needed for the safety of the flight, and must not take off or land unless the information indicates that the aeroplane can operate safely.
6.4 Aerodrome information. Whether operating at an aerodrome or an ALA the pilot of an aeroplane needs to know:
• the location of the aerodrome or ALA and the features that can be used to positively identify it as the aerodrome intended for landing.
• the means of identifying the boundaries of the manoeuvring area
• whether people, machines, stock or wildlife are likely to be present at the time of movement
• the length of (suitable) runway available
• the width of the runway
• the nature of the runway and movement area surface
• the runway elevation
• the runway direction
• the runway slope
• recency and type of usage: eg., use as agricultural strip, any current fixed-wing, gliding or parachute operations etc
• surface type: eg., seal, broken seal, black soil, sandy loam, naturally soft, naturally hard, gravel, small/larger stones, etc
• surface conditions: eg., cracked, sandy, soft gravel, muddy, recently ploughed, hardened mud (rutted or stock-pitted), heavily grassed, lightly grassed, etc.
• surface moisture levels: eg., dry, moist, wet, muddy
• ambient conditions: temperature, wind, general conditions
• obstructions in the approach, take-off and lateral transition areas
• power lines near the aerodrome
• any management limits on the use of the landing place
• any special procedures applicable at the landing place: eg one off activities
• NOTAMs or AIP Supplements applicable to the area
6.5 No-go situations. Every pilot must learn to resist personal and external pressures to proceed without essential safety information, or when evidence suggests safety is not reasonably assured. It is also important that other persons involved in the operation are made aware that no decision to proceed will be made until all required information has been assessed. Unless and until the operation is potentially safe both common sense and regulatory requirements mean that the take-off or landing must not be attempted.
*Appendix A shows the operational elements that should be considered when assessing the safety of a proposed movement.
6.6 Landing area manager's responsibilities. A person who gives an approval to operate must be careful to stay within his or her level of expertise. The law will usually see the provision of information as an invitation to operate, and the person giving an invitation takes on a duty of care for the welfare of the person invited. In a matter of negligence the question to be answered will usually be "was the risk reasonably foreseeable to the visitor or the class of persons to whom the visitor belongs?"
• Nothing by way of conjecture should be said, and only information known beyond reasonable doubt to be accurate should be passed. If the person who is asked for advice about a landing place is not clearly aware of the facts needed to answer a question, he or she would be well advised not to volunteer an answer. Information found to be wrong should be corrected even if the pilot is on the way.
• It is essential that a person who issues an approval to land or take off an aeroplane either:
(a) limit themselves to issuing approval to operate plus providing only known fixed information such as surveyed length of runway, aerodrome elevation and compass orientation; or
(b) given an arguable awareness of the requirements on the basis of training and experience, provide fixed information plus variable surface conditions and weather information they have reasonable grounds to believe are correct.
• In all cases the responsibility for safe operation rests with the pilot, and while the owner or manager has an obligation to provide factual information, he or she is not required to guarantee that an aerodrome is safe for landing or take-off.
• A landing area's owner or manager is less likely to be held responsible if the visitor is without a lawful right to use the aerodrome. However, the owner or manager of a clearly marked aerodrome, which is unserviceable or hazardous, would be wise to provide warning to others about its status. He or she could probably discharge any duty of care by removing the markings or by displaying an unserviceability cross on the aerodrome.
7.2 A pilot is authorised by virtue of his or her licence to assess these factors before deciding whether a particular movement should take place. If a pilot fails to discover or consider any significant factor affecting the safety of a movement, he or she may be liable to action in negligence.
*Appendix A, 'Dimensional and Other Guidelines for Aircraft Landing Areas (ALAs)' shows the minimum ALA physical standards for aeroplanes below 5700kg.
• Higher standards apply to licensed aerodromes, with the most stringent requirements being for licensed or private aerodromes where high capacity aeroplanes are used in commercial passenger transport operations.
9.2 Density altitude. Increased density altitude markedly reduces engine power output (this effect can be delayed if an aircraft is fitted with a turbocharger, which can maintain a regulated inlet air pressure to flight level heights). If necessary, density altitude can be determined by applying the ambient temperature to the pressure altitude, with each 1 deg C variation from ISA giving rise to 120ft variation in density altitude. Thus a sea level aerodrome with ISA pressure and 25 deg would have a density altitude of 1200ft. The pilot does not usually have to make a separate density altitude calculation because take-off and landing performance charts usually provide integral solutions for density altitude through entries of pressure altitude and temperature. (For more information see 'High density altitude: effect on take-off/landing performance'.)
• The limits of safety during landing would be that which caused damage to the tyres or aeroplane structure, or loss of directional control. Low tyre pressure can have a very significant effect (note how difficult it is to shift an aeroplane by pushing it about the tarmac with low tyre pressures, or experience the difference between pushing a fully-loaded wheelbarrow with a very low tyre pressure versus the same load on a tyre with higher pressure).
10.2 Surface. The main variable in rolling resistance is the nature of the runway surface. The surface may be concrete, bitumen, coral, gravel, soil, grass on soil or sand, hard packed sand or a dry salt-bed (salt lake), each with its own characteristics, many of which vary with the weather and season. Obviously the rolling resistance on concrete or bitumen is minimal and predictable, but the rolling resistance on other types of surface varies widely between surface types, and will even vary with changes in surface solidity along the length of a given runway.
• Rolling resistance can be caused by standing water on any runway surface because it builds up in front of the wheels (witness the braking effect on a car driven across a water-covered causeway).
• In the case of any natural surface the soil moisture content significantly affects rolling resistance, as does surface looseness, presence of algal growth, grass mass and characteristics, surface irregularities, and subsurface softness. Very dry is helpful on some natural surfaces but detrimental on others. With the exception of beach sand very wet almost invariably gives rise to an unsatisfactory surface. Grass density, greenness and length have a significant effect on the rolling behaviour of an aeroplane (grass can also hide obstructions, holes, water, stones, anthills and erosion trenches).
10.3 Assessing the variables. Table 1 to Annex A provides some guidance about the effects of various surface conditions, but no table can reasonably cater for all scenarios or all factors, and a pilot must develop an ability to make his/her own assessments. Some of the factors that will affect the safety of take-off are:
• transverse or lateral slope, which can affect the aerodynamics of flight, and may also result in a longer take-off roll because the pilot has to use asymmetric brake, nosewheel steering or rudder to keep straight
• gravel, which may mean a longer take-off roll because power may have to be applied slowly during the initial roll to avoid stone-chip damage to the propeller, and may, if very soft, give rise to a wave effect in front of the wheels that resists forward motion
• sand, which is usually worse than gravel in terms of creating rolling resistance
• grass, which resists the passage of an aeroplane rolling over it: while attempts are made to predict the effects of certain lengths of grass, rolling resistance will vary not just with the length, but also freshness, moisture content, density of stalks and the mass of material present
• free water, which not only affects the softness or slipperiness of the surface but can build up in front of an aeroplane?s wheels and cause a resistance to rolling, or at higher speeds, lift the wheels and cause aquaplaning and difficulty in maintaining directional control
• water in soil, can create mud, which can affect an aircraft's direction control and may choke spats or wheel-wells and restrict rotation of its wheels. In addition, soft spots may allow an aeroplane's wheel(s) to sink enough for the propeller to hit the ground, or may cause erratic rates of acceleration during a take-off.
• bearing capacity, which is related to the type of runway surface and the aeroplane's weight and tyre pressure. If the bearing capacity is insufficient for the combination of aeroplane, tyres and surface, a form of bogging may occur even in dry conditions (as might be experienced when driving a vehicle over sand or a freshly ploughed paddock).
10.4 Reliability of information. Be aware that some ALAs may be managed by persons who have limited ability to assess the proposed landing area's operational status. A pilot could get approval to land and related information from the manager of a proposed landing area but may not have full confidence in the quality of the information received. In such a case the pilot has to accept that there is no basis for an operational decision to proceed, and should cancel the flight or operate to the nearest aerodrome (see the definition).
11.2 Humidity. Light aeroplane data does not usually include a humidity correction, but all engines are adversely affected to some degree by high humidity because water vapour displaces oxygen and reduces temperature rise during combustion. If the aeroplane's documentation provides relevant information the pilot should allow for the effects of humidity in a critical take-off.
12.2 Factoring. 'Factors' are safety margins applied to the calculation of take-off and landing distance requirements to allow for random variables in aircraft, pilot and runway surface performance encountered in normal operations. Safety factors need to be applied because an aeroplane manufacturer's advertised performance figures are determined by a company test pilot on a good surface using a finely tuned machine in ideal weather conditions.
• Private operations. As mentioned earlier, the regulations don't require the application of any factoring for small aeroplanes in private operations except in certain circumstances such as land and hold short operations (LAHSO), where a common standard has to apply to all participants.
*See Appendix A Table 1.
12.4 Weight Altitude Temperature (WAT) limitations. [Not applicable to ultralight operations]
12.5 Performance category. [Not applicable to ultralight operations]
12.6 Flap settings. The use of flap during take-off may be optional, or it may be the standard configuration for the aircraft. The latter is most likely to be the case in aeroplanes with wings optimised for higher indicated airspeeds. Pilots should be aware that while flap generally reduces the take-off roll by permitting lift-off at a slower speed, drag is always increased and the rate of climb after take-off is reduced until flap is retracted. Despite the reduced rate of climb, use of flap will allow a slightly slower take-off safety speed, which usually results in a steeper climb angle than in the clean configuration.
• Where a take-off flap setting is optional, flap can be used to reduce rolling resistance on a soft or rough runway (and thus the length of the ground roll), but it would normally be retracted at a safe speed after take-off and the aeroplane then allowed to accelerate to the speed for best rate of climb.
12.7 Braking performance. The nominal braking performance of an aeroplane is a design feature of each aeroplane type. Braking performance is also a function of runway surface conditions, availability of anti-skid, the pilot's braking technique, tyre condition and inflation, brake disc condition and residual temperature, aeroplane speed and mass, and the presence of slush, mud, water and other more subtle factors. In the case of a minimum field landing in an aeroplane, which is not equipped with anti-skid, one of the major difficulties is the pilot's ability to judge the application of maximum brake just short of wheel-skid. All of the relevant factors must be considered when assessing the aeroplane's likely performance in a critical situation.
12.8 Reverse thrust. [Not applicable to ultralight operations]
12.9 Propeller strikes and engine damage. A muddy, irregular or watery surface on an aerodrome or taxiing area can cause a propeller tip strike that may not be noticed by the pilot. When operating on a natural surface runway, careful preflight inspections of the propeller(s) are imperative.
• If a tip-strike happens during taxi for take-off it could easily result in an abandoned take-off, and possibly a major accident. Any propeller strike will probably cause some form of blade bending, distortion or delamination, but a serious strike will bend the tips back, distort the angle of the blades, may damage a gear-case or bend the propeller shaft, and will usually give rise to severe and probably dangerous vibration.
• If damage has occurred it cannot be ignored and will not correct itself. If a pilot has any reason to at all to suspect that a propeller may have struck the ground during taxi for take-off the only rational thing to do is to shut down the engine and inspect the propeller before attempting take-off.
12.10 FOD, gravel and dust. Foreign object damage (FOD) to a turbine engine may cause loss of power or complete failure. FOD frequently arises when gravel is sprayed into the engine intake by the nosewheel, or picked up in a vortex under the engine intake at high power.
• Dust will damage both piston and turbine engines, but can be reduced in piston engines by use of filtered air. Pilots should be aware that full power for take-off is predicated on selection of unfiltered ram air, and that carburettor heat is usually unfiltered.
• Foreign objects, especially gravel, may cause propeller chipping and may give rise to propeller cracks after being caught up in the propeller tip vortices of an engine doing a run-up, or at high rpm during the early stages of take-off. The possibility of propeller damage by gravel may be a significant operational consideration in a take-off from an unswept bitumen or a natural surface, because while the potential for damage can be greatly reduced by progressive application of power during the take-off roll (thus reducing vortices), the take-off distance required is usually calculated assuming full power at brakes release.
13.2 Obstruction-free areas. Obstruction free areas on a runway extended centre-line provide for low angles of take-off and safe clearance on approach. A significant clear area at the end of a runway may have an important psychological effect on the way a pilot handles an aeroplane during take-off and landing.
• During take-off, close-in obstructions on the runway extended centre-line may cause a pilot to lift off early and climb at an excessive angle, which will aggravate any problem of poor view of obstructions through the windscreen at high pitch angles, which in turn may lead to a further increase in pitch.
• During landing, high ground or obstructions in the approach area can cause a pilot to adopt a high approach path. Significant obstacles below the runway such as sea walls, creeks or ditches may also cause a pilot to approach at an excessively high angle and then land long. This effect is likely to be worse when the aeroplane has poor forward visibility or is approaching in a flapless configuration.
13.3 Emergency alighting areas, and climb in the event of engine failure during take-off. Among the characteristics of a good aerodrome for single-engined aeroplanes is an area accessible from the lift-off point to safe manoeuvring height that is suitable for carrying out a forced landing in the event of engine failure after take-off. Similarly, for twin-engined aeroplanes, a good aerodrome will have an obstacle-free, low-angle departure area where an engine failure could be handled with minimum danger of striking ground or obstacles.
13.4 Light conditions. Pilots should not underestimate the potential difficulty of taking-off or landing directly into a low sun, and should take into account haze, smoke or low light when manoeuvring in the vicinity of an aerodrome or looking for other traffic. In particular, if a take-off or landing into the sun is known to be likely, the pilot should make every effort to ensure the windscreen is clean.
14.2 Demonstrated landing distance. Part 23 requires the manufacturer of an aeroplane to demonstrate the landing distance required for the aeroplane. The demonstrated landing distance (DLD) is the figure supplied by the manufacturer for the pilot to use as the basis for assessment of landing distance required for a particular landing. Pilots should be aware that the aeroplane manufacturer has a vested interest in publishing the minimum distance obtained in a landing under the conditions permitted for the tests.
The requirements for the test are:
• the aeroplane must approach at not less than 1.3 times the stall speed in the landing configuration;
• the aeroplane must cross the threshold at not less than 50ft;
• the test must be done on a dry, sealed surface; and
• the aerodrome must be within 2% slope up and 2% down.
• the manufacturer is also at liberty to have the certification done by an experienced test pilot authorised to fly as aggressively as possible short of damaging the aeroplane. It follows that pilots conducting normal operations are highly unlikely to replicate the aeroplane manufacturer's DLD in normal operations, and therefore have a duty of care to apply appropriate safety margins.
14.3 Performance information. The aircraft's flight manual, owner?s manual, operating handbook or placarding should provide relevant performance information, but presentations are not standardised. Learning how to find and interpret a particular aircraft's performance information should be part of a pilot's familiarisation with the aeroplane.
14.4 Relevant nomenclature. There are few standard 'V speeds' or suchlike performance notations formally applicable to small aeroplanes. Notwithstanding, a number of notations are frequently used to describe small aeroplane performance parameters.
*A list of notations in common usage for large and small aircraft are shown at Annex A Table 4.
15.2 One-way operations. One-way operations are little used in Australia except in some hill-country agricultural operations, usually fertiliser dropping. If the only available landing strip faces into a hill, landings have to take place toward the hill and take-offs made away from the high ground. A problem with many one-way landing strips is that rising ground precludes a go-around beyond some point short of the target threshold.
• Don't try to use a one-way strip unless you are highly experienced or formally trained, and have recent practice in landing in minimum distance. If a pilot intends to operate off one-way strips, logbook evidence of skill training by an experienced agricultural instructor would be a wise precaution against insurance problems and general liability.
• Many one-way strips have a steep slope, and even experienced pilots may have difficulty with perspective on final - a normal approach angle is likely to appear too steep, causing the pilot to descend to establish an abnormally shallow approach angle with a high approach speed. If the landing area backs on to high ground the pilot may find him or herself committed to a landing above target threshold speeds and either try for a go-around and fail to outclimb the gradient, or have to proceed with a high-speed landing that results in over-running the (usually short) landing strip.
• Another major problem for one-way operations is the possibility of adverse winds. Tail winds on a minimum length strip are a recipe for disaster, and turbulent winds in hilly areas can cause severe handling problems even if they are generally in the optimum direction.
back to top
• For agricultural operations, operating on runways less than 10 metres is not recommended.
2.2 Runway length for landing. A runway length at least equal to that specified in the aeroplane's flight manual (or approved alternative) for the prevailing conditions is generally the minimum acceptable. If an unfactored landing distance (the DLD) is shown in the AFM, the pilot should call for at least 15% additional landing distance.
• Qualified agricultural pilots may conduct day operations off runways equal to 75% of the runway requirements specified in the aeroplane's flight manual for the prevailing conditions, provided that (at least) the remaining 25% of the nominal runway length is available as clearway, and given that the aeroplane approaches to land over the clearway and takes off toward the clearway.
• Night agricultural operations should be conducted off runways at least 50% longer than those required for day operations, preferably with additional clearway because obstructions will be unlit.
2.3 Longitudinal Slope. The longitudinal slope between the runway ends should not exceed 2%, except that 2.86% is considered safe on part of the runway so long as the change of slope is gradual. In agricultural operations, runway slope should not exceed 12.5% for day and 2% for night operations.
• Where overall slope exceeds 2% the runway should be used only for one-way operations, with landing uphill and take-off downhill.
2.4 Transverse Slope. The transverse slope between the extreme edges of the runway strip should not exceed 2.5% or 12.5% upward slope over the fly-over area. For agricultural day operations, the transverse slope should not be more than 3% over the runway and 5% over the runway strip.
2.5 Wind. The effects of wind cannot be ignored because it dramatically affects the distance required for a landing or take-off. A windsock is the preferred method of determining wind, and is a must if the aerodrome is used frequently. In other cases, consider having a person provide a smoke signal (fire or smoke flare) clear of the approach path near the approach end of the runway.
2.6 Other Physical Characteristics. Both ends of a runway should have approach and take-off areas clear of objects above a 5% slope for day and a 3.3% slope for night operations. If an object or terrain projects above the surveyed angle it must be sufficiently far away to allow an aeroplane taking off to turn before it is reached, and to permit a safe turn onto finals. [Other recommended landing area physical characteristics are shown on the full document]
2.7 Float plane alighting areas. For water operations, a minimum water channel width of 60 metres for day and 90 metres for night operations is recommended. The depth of water over the whole water channel should not be less than 0.3 metres below the hull or floats of the stationary aeroplane when loaded to maximum take-off weight. An additional area, as shown in the following diagrams, provides a protective buffer for the water channel but need not consist of water. Where the additional area consists of water then it should be clear of moving objects, or vessels under way. The centre line of a water channel may be curved, provided that the approach and take-off areas are calculated from the anticipated point of touchdown or lift-off.
4.2 Where runway markers are provided which are not flush with the surface, they should be constructed of a material that is not likely to damage an aeroplane.
6.2 Geographic Location. A landing area should not be located:
• under an instrument approach area or in such a position that it presents a hazard to aircraft conducting a published instrument approach;
• within any area where the density of aircraft movements creates a hazard; or
• where take-off or landing over buildings, noise sensitive livestock or populated areas causes a nuisance or hazard.
6.3 If a proposed landing area is located near a city, town or populous area or any other area where noise or other environmental considerations make aeroplane operations undesirable, the availability of such a landing area may be affected by the provisions of relevant environmental legislation.
• pacing: all individuals have their own stride length which can be established by averaging, with about 0.75 metre being a common walking stride that might be used to determine the length of a runway, and 1 metre being a long, deliberate stride that might be used to find the width of a runway;
• motor: the odometer of a calmly driven vehicle or motorcycle can be used to measure the length of a runway and many clearways;
• measuring wheel: the best method, with wheels commonly available and used for a variety of land measuring tasks.
7.2 Slope. If the slope is seen as significant it can be measured by farm or surveyor's inclinometer, or the pilot may take altimeter readings at both ends of the runway, convert the altimeter reading to metres and divide the altitude difference by strip length to get slope. For example, if the altimeter reading at each end of a 800m runway differs by 55 ft (16m) the ratio is established at 1:50 by dividing runway length with the height difference (800/16). This equates to a slope of 2% (refer to the conversion table para.3)
8.2 Soft, wet surfaces. A test vehicle should be driven in a zig-zag pattern at a speed not exceeding 15 kph along the full length and width of the runway. Particular attention should be paid to suspect areas with up to three passes over suspect ground. If the vehicle's tyre marks exceed a depth of 25mm the surface is not suitable for any aeroplane which can be reasonably represented by the test vehicle. As a rule, an aeroplane with small wheels or high tyre pressures will require harder runways. If recent heavy rain or other waterlogging has occurred, the ground should be tested with a crowbar in several places along the runway to ensure that a dry surface crust does not conceal a wet base.
Standard factors for take-off: for all MTOWs 1.15 or 115%
Standard factors for landing: up to 2000kg MTOW 1.15 or 115%
9.3 After factoring the DLD in accordance with Table 1 the pilot should apply further factors in accordance with any guidance given in the AFM. If the AFM is not helpful, consider applying any of the allowances shown in Tables 2 and 3 below that are relevant to the flight.
(These effects are additive)
* Effects are variable and possibly unpredictable. Expect a ground distance increase, but airborne distance remains the same
** If wet grass is on soft ground the effect on rolling resistance is cumulative, so both elements must be considered.
(These effects are additive)
* Effects are variable and possibly unpredictable. While rolling resistance is increased, reduced braking effectiveness has the greater effect. Airborne distance remains the same but expect an increase in ground distance.
** In factoring the effect of wind, reduce estimated headwind by 50% and assume that a tailwind is 50% greater than the estimate.
Table 4: Standard notations (the 'V-speeds')
The following informal list of notations are typical of those used in depicting performance and handling values for various aircraft (most relate to large aircraft):
Groundschool – Flight Planning & Navigation Guide
| Guide content | 1. Australian airspace regulations | 2. Charts & compass | 3. Route planning | 4. Effect of wind |
| 5. Flight plan completion | 6. Safety audit | 7. Airmanship & flight discipline | 8. Enroute adjustments |
| 9. Supplementary navigation techniques | 10. Global Positioning System | 11. Using the ADF |
| 12. Electronic planning & navigation | 13. ADS-B surveillance technology |
| Operations at non-controlled airfields | [Safety during take-off & landing] |