Jump to content

Brand New A380 Crash


Recommended Posts

I received this by email. I was very skeptical because it had the usual melodramatic flavour to it and also contained a rant which I have removed before re-printing it here.

 

Last night it was referred to Capt. Richard De Crespigny (Capt of the QANTAS A380 flight 32 engine burst incident) for his comment and he has confirmed that this incident did take place and that the details are essentially correct. So -

 

OOPS!

 

This brand spanking new Airbus 340-600, one of the largest passenger aircraft ever built, sits just outside its hangar in Toulouse , France without a single hour of airtime.

 

455019589_Untitledattachment00064.jpg.453ced5d9e40772e6d1bf884d3a09eb2.jpg

 

The flight crew of Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies (ADAT) entered to conduct pre-delivery tests on the ground, such as engine run-ups, prior to delivery to Etihad Airways.

 

2000895030_Untitledattachment00067.jpg.80470876e8ef2b68254c0b8beddd6ed0.jpg

 

The ADAT crew taxied the A340-600 to the run-up area, then they took all four engines to take-off power. Perhaps they didn't realise just how light an empty A340-600 really is.

 

 

1190670602_Untitledattachment00070.jpg.0225ee34719cc36c6f2a2fd6914f45bf.jpg

 

The aircraft computers thought they were trying to take-off because they had all four engines at full power, but the plane wasn't configured properly (flaps/slats, etc..) so a warning horn was blaring away ...

 

 

1640734889_Untitledattachment00073.jpg.9423e3438c0d800bd813002755f446c6.jpg

 

 

One of the ADAT crew pulled the circuit breaker on the Ground Proximity Sensor to silence the alarm. This fooled the aircraft into thinking it was in the air. The computers automatically released all the brakes which set the aircraft rocketing forward.

 

 

1082958552_Untitledattachment00076.jpg.f02de29c37e3399e4519b992e40b8a35.jpg

 

 

The ADAT crew didn't know that this is a safety feature so that pilots can't land with the brakes on. The crew quickly throttled the engines back from their max power setting but the fans had so much stored energy that they continued to produce thrust for a few moments, so the $200 million brand-new aircraft crashed into a blast barrier, totalling it.

 

 

1007621075_Untitledattachment00079.jpg.4d9928160a81d4c74b6761d3a4f68d14.jpg

 

The extent of injuries to the crew is unknown due to a media news blackout in France.

 

 

1739089932_Untitledattachment00082.jpg.bc43b9b711cdd78d23a9a635af588add.jpg

 

Coverage of the story was kept tightly under wraps ...

 

 

200612445_Untitledattachment00085.jpg.750f2eea1420d41c65ad70e63d9aa96d.jpg

 

 

but the photos are starting to leak out.

 

1066473267_Untitledattachment00091.jpg.30a30aaaafe4aa136ce6bae42d2b5897.jpg

 

Airbus accepted responsibility and they paid ...

 

 

 

1966603011_Untitledattachment00088.jpg.c8e1d3a1a1bc22ade4c70ed10f7f921c.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Maj Millard

This occurred several years ago when an Ethiad ferry crew went to pick the aircraft up at the Airbus factory. Whilst performing ground engine runs an annoying alarm keep coming up, so they pulled the offending circut-breaker to silence the alarm.

 

What the alarm was trying to tell them is that you can't go to full power on the ground, in a non- loaded Airbus. Basically they hadn't read or headed the aircraft's operation manual.

 

After pulling the breaker they again went to full power, whereas the computer said "oh we must be flying now" and promptly released the brakes !.............resulting in the aircraft impacting the barrier. Airbus placed a blanket media ban on the incident as did the airline, for as stated..."possible negative kickback onto the Arab crew"..........................Maj....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't let the facts ruin a good story

 

The incident did occur but not exactly as described in the numerous email stories which have continued circulating ever since

 

It was an Airbus technician who was in charge of the test, no circuit breakers were pulled & there was no media blackout

 

There is a translation of the BEA accident report here - http://www.pprune.org/4705627-post484.html

 

Cheers

 

John

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read the report, I take back the OK bit, but they are still low-hour engines.

#3 has a few more hours than the rest - it ran for 7 hours after the accident (until it ran out of fuel).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the alarm was trying to tell them is that you can't go to full power on the ground, in a non- loaded Airbus.

I can tell you that ain't true! You can always apply TOGA thrust (full thrust) on an Airbus on the ground at any weight. The alarm would be telling them they have thrust on with the park brake still set (takeoff config warning), but it certainly won't release the brakes for you.

Not quite sure what possessed Richard DC to say the details in the article are "essentially correct" unless he'd consumed a bit much red wine. They don't make much sense on a number of counts. The BEA report makes sense though, and certainly the photos are genuine.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know an Electra can jump the chocks on a run up, but props have more thrust. No I was not on it.

 

The A-340 -600 would have about 240,000 Lbs of thrust plus a bit. and an empty weight plus a bit of fuel around 420,000 Lbs I would not like to try it, as the plane was unchocked . You would want to make sure no-one was behind as well nev

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...