Jump to content

On predicting in flight collisions


RFguy

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Garfly said:

 

(Obviously, in Oz, we don't have the same freedoms they do in the US around low level ops.)

 

 

 

 

What are the differences?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Garfly said:

Trent Palmer's take on this issue is interesting, given his own run-ins with the FAA

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCwj9iKVUF4

 

(Obviously, in Oz, we don't have the same freedoms they do in the US around low level ops.)

 

7 hours ago, Red said:

What are the differences?

 

Generally (with exceptions) the not-below-500' rule applies in Australia (over sparsely populated areas). 

 

See VFRG  pp. 44-49

https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-02/visual-flight-rules-guide.pdf

 

Whereas flight below 500' is generally allowed in the US (the exceptions are outlined by Trent Palmer in the video.)

 

According to the FAA AIM:  "While 14 CFR Part 91.119 allows flight below 500 AGL when over sparsely populated areas or open water, such operations are very dangerous."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

......... yes it was unusual how the legislators imposed a driving log and hours on those that were getting a license while they themselves were not subjected to it (of course that sequence was unavoidable)

 

all that system - the driving log - does is stimulate false entry to get those hours up ( ....... a bit like when you have a CPL and need just a few more hours to stand out shoulders above the rest)                       (and I appreciate not all do this)

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...