Jump to content
poteroo

Meet Our Local RV's

Recommended Posts

poteroo

We have quite a few RV's in this South Coastal region of WA. Most were built here. At least 50% of owners are also formation endorsed. We have a strong SAAA chapter here (#13). The 1st 10 aircraft are shown below.

20131012_031_VH-VFE_Vans_RV-9A_Scott_Palmer.thumb.jpg.8663b0be2811ef35d8c468a3f7bd0fd5.jpg

20131012_021_VH-ROV_Vans_RV-6A_Scott_Palmer.thumb.jpg.de749822042abbb447b6b3ff6d221891.jpg

20131012_025_VH-WMV_VH-MMZ_Vans_RV-6_Scott_Palmer.thumb.jpg.4e2807ff64f75690d9708857fadbb357.jpg

20131012_048_VH-XRV_Vans_RV-6_VH-ROV_Vans_RV-6A_Scott_Palmer.thumb.jpg.b922eae56dc199908dc172036a5a5719.jpg

830685459_RV7AVVFAlbany3-1-14.thumb.jpg.158298872c304f7fc8434a04336c29bd.jpg

1439250498_VH-VNEVANSRV6offtheAlbanycoastin2004soldin2006.thumb.jpg.4f7e69cbc632d679e35a2196646afc0b.jpg

91458862_IvansRV9A001.thumb.jpg.a5152b81d31798aecaca9214c6882edb.jpg

34899546_RVs20thOctoer2005009.thumb.jpg.ce59db786dc7fcee21ee39fe3330763f.jpg

!cid_part10_06010309_07040805@westnet_com.thumb.jpg.e85116adf46121beac3ac0bdee24671f.jpg

273531366_AlbanyFF25-4-13.thumb.jpg.0d8aa819c8795b0474d9e2a23159ca92.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shafs64

They are just an awesome looking aircraft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yenn

I went to denmark WA a few years ago to a fly in. It was practically an RV benefit and I believe denmark has the highest concentration of RVs per head of population than anywhere else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poteroo
I went to denmark WA a few years ago to a fly in. It was practically an RV benefit and I believe denmark has the highest concentration of RVs per head of population than anywhere else.

 

On a location basis that's probably true. Actually Chapter 13 SAAA is Albany + Denmark + lots of other places in the Great Southern and Western South Coast. Besides the 10 RV's that I've already posted, there are another 14 to come so I'll tack a few onto this reply. (7). Building has slowed down here as we've all aged and the original enthusiasm of the late 90's has burnt out. You can see our formation group of 2005 is now much different - far less t/w RV6's and more 7A and 9A models. Esperance has a lot more building activity these days with about 6 RV's based down there now. Their only problem is that there's no formation rated instructors available there atm. happy days,

682470984_AlbanyRVflightrefueelingatYESP.thumb.jpg.914efd7819d9dabce4ebc1d68266f0b7.jpg

1201277554_JSPandORE17-8-14.thumb.jpg.1c6f6b98622417b62362772bda6d69bf.jpg

193687338_RV8VH-VLYAlbanyJune2014.thumb.JPG.4d09d7de14b6d3a3b88faa933141c5de.JPG

576318719_AlbanyVANSRVFormationPracticeSunday9thJanuary2005003.thumb.jpg.fc7471f91174de8c1d12b07f02c240a5.jpg

200982615_AlbanyVANSRVFormationPracticeSunday9thJanuary2005027.thumb.jpg.d4eb08e572700b44512a93d990e5098d.jpg

701008272_AlbanyVANSRVFormationPracticeSunday9thJanuary2005043.thumb.jpg.b6018a0d3bd3014868cda9398d74b8ea.jpg

429440879_AlbanyVANSRVFormationPracticeSunday9thJanuary2005018.thumb.jpg.1613a154674cbbd5fc47a4fc3f0132c4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poteroo

And another 4 that I can find.

DSC00559.thumb.JPG.446715a2c3548acc68fcc81c9a347f14.JPG

DSC00563.thumb.JPG.4eff23c83ca38eb3792b27f9d964915c.JPG

DSC00577.thumb.JPG.34caea3d2883636a3548453394775b95.JPG

!cid_part10_06010309_07040805@westnet_com.thumb.jpg.071654988a591d4c42d2d8da43c67085.jpg

1036077052_VFEandVNEoverAlbanyHarbour2014.thumb.JPG.be742ca9e9b73e054d4c86969f4a2636.JPG

36063580_VNEandVFEinechelonrightnrNarrogin17Aug2014.thumb.JPG.acbea70aafac39023badf2b9ac2e75e2.JPG

2043682829_OSZinformation22Jan2005002.thumb.jpg.7ca0ad3e3ad000d127d184572a309869.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ben87r

Wow! I may need to move south not East!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jakej

Where's the 10 ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yenn

I am surprised that there are so many nosewheel A aeroplanes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poteroo
I am surprised that there are so many nosewheel A aeroplanes.

 

Better resale value for 1. Better crosswind ability for 2. easier to fly for 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poteroo
Where's the 10 ?

 

Do you mean an RV-10? Or, can't you locate 10 RV's in the initial post?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jakej

Yeah, meant an RV10 :cheezy grin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poteroo
Yeah, meant an RV10 :cheezy grin:

 

The original RV-10 built here went to Kununurra, was onsold to another Ord resident, and is still there. An RV-10 has just been completed here by an ex Cathay Captain, and is currently in Jandakot. Another RV-10 is under way here in Albany by one of our local RV6 owner/builders....he's a glutton for punishment! I did some of the test flying on the first RV-10 and it was a rocket! 175KTAS no worries! 260HP + CSU = action! happy days,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
facthunter

I don't think the designer recommends an engine that big.. Nev

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
barramundi

very nice looking aircraft! drooling. when can i fly one :-p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RetiredRacer

What an awesome collection, WOW!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KRviator
I don't think the designer recommends an engine that big.. Nev
Van also doesn't recommend engines bigger than 160HP in the -9 either, yet many have installed O-360's, and I've got an O-340 (165HP, for now...)

 

That's why they call it experimental!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poteroo
I don't think the designer recommends an engine that big.. Nev

 

Actually, the -10 is recommended with either a 210 HP IO-360, or the 260 HP version of the IO-540 Lycoming. Both the -10s built here have IO-540 installed.

 

The main limitation that comes up on the VANS info is the HP for an RV9 or RV9A. VANS say max 160HP, but many builders have used 180HP. In the US, everyone based in the 'high' states uses 180HP. You just need to remember that the Va for an RV9/9A is much lower than for other RV's - around 110 is what they say, but my calculations say it's closer to 98-100....based on the calculation of 2V3.8 x Vs (50). I take a lot of care when negotiating around wx as it's just so easy to allow your speed to increase in an RV.

(whoops, sorry - didn't see the last post re HP & 9's)

happy days,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gwaf

Don't forget there are at least 9 Rv's at YBUN !!! with some more under construction ... something about them, they are like a..holes everybody has one! LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
winsor68
Actually, the -10 is recommended with either a 210 HP IO-360, or the 260 HP version of the IO-540 Lycoming. Both the -10s built here have IO-540 installed.

 

The main limitation that comes up on the VANS info is the HP for an RV9 or RV9A. VANS say max 160HP, but many builders have used 180HP. In the US, everyone based in the 'high' states uses 180HP. You just need to remember that the Va for an RV9/9A is much lower than for other RV's - around 110 is what they say, but my calculations say it's closer to 98-100....based on the calculation of 2V3.8 x Vs (50). I take a lot of care when negotiating around wx as it's just so easy to allow your speed to increase in an RV.

(whoops, sorry - didn't see the last post re HP & 9's)

happy days,

I read that the RV9 is an easier aircraft to operate...does the lower specifications (and I presume strength) equate to an easier build?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KRviator

I've just finished building my RV-9 and she'll be going to the airport in a few weeks. The build process was both fun, and a little challenging in a couple of areas, mostly where I deviated from the plans slightly.

 

If you liked Lego or Meccano as a kid, you will have no problem whatsoever with the modern RV's. The RV-3,4 and 6 aren't "matched-hole" kits, but the -7 and -9 are essentially identical bar the wing.

 

If you can afford an RV, and have a tolerant wife, odds are you'll be able to finish it, they are not difficult kits at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poteroo
I read that the RV9 is an easier aircraft to operate...does the lower specifications (and I presume strength) equate to an easier build?

 

Actually takes a little longer to build the wings because they are longer and have 12% more surface area, larger flaps too. Rest is the same as a 7A. Longer wings = more hangar space needed too. IMHO, the 9A is nicer to fly than any of the short-wings. It has a lower Vs and Vso - so you could say it's safer. However, it is slower than the 7A because of the increased drag - not that you'd really notice it with an RV....they are plenty fast enough anyway. happy days,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poteroo

Just a PS to my post above. If I was building again I'd still go for the 9A, but I'd look carefully at a low compression engine that would handle premium ULP. I believe there's one which gives about 165-170 HP....which would be perfect. happy days,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Downunder

Post #5. Love the green and white one.... "Lucky 7"..... great paint job....even down to detail on the spats...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AJ85WA

Hey Guys

 

Glad to see there is a good amount of RV activity in WA.

 

I have built and now flying my 6 for almost a year (65hrs). looking forward to catching up with all the RV flyers out there. I have a hangar north of Perth @ Bindoon.

Is there a forum or facebook page you guys normally communicate on to go for a hamburger run and fly-in on weekends? Would be great to have a reason to go flying every weekend :)

 

Cheers AJ

 

DSC01303_zpsef2add42.jpgDSC01284_zpse6fb02ce.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KRviator

DSC01303_zpsef2add42.jpg

If you haven't seen the calls for Van's Calender submissions before, I'd certainly send that in next round. It's a cracker!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×