Jump to content

Swan river incident


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've just had an email confirming that the Mallard lost was the one that has been recently based at Watts Bridge and the pilot was the Evans Head developer. Very sad to hear this. We wish to pass on our heartfelt condolences to his family and also to the family of the passenger who was with him.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to me all the holes in the cheese lined up......

 

Hot weather, gusting tail wind, low speed, low level turn and bank......

 

Take out one of them and it might never have happened and no one would be the wiser as to how close it came......

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recorded from a different locationhttps://u.nya.is/laczkw.mp4

Thanks for posting this video as it shows clearly the point where it goes wrong, very sad indeed. I can't believe that things like this happen to experienced pilots ! Truely sad indeed and condolences to all family and friends.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wind direction shouldn't really make a difference (unless you enter shear, but that's not going to happen when you're maintaining approximately level flight), but a slight lapse in concentration is all it takes when you have no height to recover in.

 

When we did multi-engine low flying in the military, vigorous manoeuvring was done with a large margin above the stall speed for the configuration, bearing in mind that a 60 deg bank level turn is going to shoot your stall speed up x 1.4. A 45 deg bank level turn will increase it by x 1.2. That's almost instantaneous (as soon as the g comes on). When we were very low and slow (like when dropping life rafts at 200ft above the water right back towards approach speed), manoeuvring was kept to a minimum.

 

Banked stall speed = level stall speed / √cos(bank angle)

 

 

  • Agree 3
  • Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very sad.

 

He was empty I am told, and the Mallard has plenty of power in that config, Could have been a false sense of security being empty and aircraft feeling light. Have flown them many times loaded with pax and empty. Its like us flying RAA two seats for example one up instead of two. I can only say not enough power for some reason, or loss of power and too slow. How or why he got into this no one will really know. Could have been mechanical failure, structural, or control, as they are getting pretty old these days with lots of salt water corrosion problems. Nightmare for LAME's to keep up.

 

But we are all guessing at this point of time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was my favourite aircraft at the fly in the other week.

 

Seems like the guy was a real aviation lover. Helped pay for aircraft museum restore at Evans head, negotiated with the council to develop the airfield.

 

A sad event indeed.

 

Condolences to friends and family of both people.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of video (from different angles) plus the availability of minute by minute ADS-B readout of position, speed, altitude (via FlightAware) and a PDF of the flight manual on-line could make for a very detailed analysis of this accident. The nerd in me wants to do it but - I find myself with zero enthusiasm for it. Two people are dead and a beautiful aeroplane is gone. F*ck the people who complained about the cancellation of the SkyShow - not realistic to expect the very careful and immediate investigation that's necessary to happen in the middle of a bloody fireworks display. Let ATSB do it.

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aeroplanes are very unforgiving of inattention or error at critical times. It goes from OK to disaster in a few seconds. This is how it has been in the past and will always be. It's the nature of flying. Nev

 

 

  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aeroplanes are very unforgiving of inattention or error at critical times. It goes from OK to disaster in a few seconds. This is how it has been in the past and will always be. It's the nature of flying. Nev

Spot on Nev

And we as humans are and always will be the weakest link

 

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mallard looks as strong as a bull - I'm surprised it smashed up so much.

Most likely a consequence of this......

 

The swan river was very shallow.

One other thing I didn't mention previously was that in a wing-drop stall situation like this appears to be, the instinctive reaction is to apply opposite aileron, which will generally make the situation rapidly worsen. It's good to practice stalls like this at a safe altitude in aircraft prone to it so you learn to quickly recognise it (the Winjeel could violently drop a wing in a turning stall). On aircraft not prone to it, it's good to see the resistance of that aircraft to wing drop too. Obviously with an instructor until you're proficient and confident enough to practice yourself (if you want to do that).

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Distraction is a frequent factor in this kind of accident. However good you are at the practicing of the skill, if something takes your full attention away, you might easily stuff it up at the critical time. Tight manoeuvring at slow speed and height leaves no margin for error. If your airspeed is bleeding off, it's particularly critical it be managed precisely. If the height is minimal that can only be done by adding power, and/or reconfiguring the flaps in what may be a tight turn onto final. That's fairly normal for someone who flys most days but the workload gets high for someone who doesn't do that sort of thing all the time. Not saying this has a direct bearing on this event but I'm trying to paint a picture of a scenario/ possibility. Nev

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...which is why car designers are bypassing human control. We're next.

Hey Old Koreelah,

If you look at the Anastasia plane that hit the rock wall In SFO the automation for the ILS which wasn't working and the pilots couldn't recognise the undershoot and the both had 10000hrs command time of automation and about 300 hrs of actual hands on flying

 

You will never automate stick and rudder pilots we will always find a way to kill ourselves

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Old Koreelah,If you look at the Anastasia plane that hit the rock wall In SFO the automation for the ILS which wasn't working and the pilots couldn't recognise the undershoot...

I believe the second officer could see things were not right, but for cultural reasons declined to challenge his senior.

I've never seen a bird crash. They seem to have developed a pretty good automatic landing system.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we will always find a way to kill ourselves

Let's hope we can find ways to minimize them but then there are those that are just simply out of our control plus we can do the same thing thousands of times but then just once we do it slightly different for no apparent reason and it bites us

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...