mothra

ATC will only see the transponder return when in range of both receivers. Instruments putting out SIL 1 will be received by the ADS B ground station but filtered out of the feed to ATC as not having sufficient integrity to serve as the basis of a surveillance service. They will be seen by other airborne or ground based ADS B receivers and TCAS.

Domestic HF is still alive and kicking.  There hasn’t been a significant improvement in VHF coverage, a couple extra outlets in higher traffic areas to divide workload but nothing in remote areas.

 

 

It was at Brisbane Wednesday & Thursday last week. Assumed it was a State visit of some sort.

 

 

Had the same idea last May. No luck but did a great day trip as pax to the Bungle Bungles and back in a C210.

 

 

Logged on a couple of days ago but all the menu links took me to a dodgy looking online pharmacy site. Guess they’ve been hacked.

 

 

Almost Unknown, by Stewart Wilson. Biography of Tony Gaze Spitfire Ace and Australia's first Formula One racing driver. Tony did an interview on the ABC shortly after I read this one.

 

 

Grid Point Wind charts are available as a separate product in the Charts tab of NAIPS, a bit clunky.

 

BOM website, Aviation Services section has more on GAF.

 

 

Could it be this service is a casualty of the hundreds of job cuts brought about by management keen to get bonuses for lowering costs?

Bonus, sorry "at risk component" of management packages were one of the first things to go. Well for middle mgt, exec level who knows.

 

 

Any reference to GPS height has to be out surely for separation from other aircraft.?

Correct Nev, only barometric altitude info can be used for vertical separation.

 

 

A few informal inquiries tell me this has not been assessed by Airservices.

 

In the normal course of events the developer is required to notify the airport who bring in Airservices to assess if they (the airport) think there is an issue. Airservices can only object, they have no authority here.

 

Ryanm's closing point is right, if something like this does infringe then the procedure gets revised and consequently its usefulness impaired. Worst case its cancelled.

 

 

Peter,

 

I'm really enjoying your work, looks like you are using the technology and producing a real online mag not just an online version of a print mag (does that make sense).

 

Anyway keep 'm coming.

 

 

Well done on he solo, just wait 'till you start cross country!

 

I also like the idea of building a plane too, but depends of the wife and again $$

Remember, its easier to beg for forgiveness than plead for permission.

 

 

To answer the original post, expect no significant change for recreational and sport aviation.

 

The core of the program is procuring a single ATM system to replace the two end of life systems (TAAATS and ADATS) which don't interface with each other: economies of scale, contingency capability, integration, all those sorts of arguments. Civil and RAAF ATC will still operate their own airspace, just using essentially the same kit and no planned reduction in ATC numbers.

 

There is a lot of talk about what such a system could do but no clear understanding of what will actually be delivered yet. Anyone old enough to remember what was promised from TAAATS? All sounds very similar.

 

As far as access to PRD airspace goes, Defence position is that they have made as many concessions as they believe they can without compromising capability: adding RA status, cancelling some under-utilised R areas and changing the default activation from 'Active unless deactivated by NOTAM' to "Deactive unless Activated by NOTAM" wherever they could. We are a long way from the concept of airspace as a national asset whose use is allocated dynamically on the basis of greatest benefit for the users.

 

 

KP, if I've learnt one thing by being here in B S central its this.:

 

The objective is not necessarily to do something about ( insert topic of the day) its to appear to be doing something about it.

 

Sad really

 

 

My younger brother was apprenticed as a fitter and turner and taught me to hand shapen drills decades ago, there are some details to get right and you'll butcher a few on the way but its a skill worth having.

 

Bigger diameter drills are easier to learn on and give you a chance to recover a botched job.

 

You can end up with some minor variance in diameter if you are off a bit so I'd always recommend a new drill for precision work, its not that expensive in the end .

 

 

I'm not afraid of heights, I'm afraid of falling from height. In fact its not the fall, its the sudden stop at the bottom I'm not keen on..

 

In the air I used to have moments of WTF am I doing here, now all gone.

 

 

Are we talking 400 feet AGL and 500 feet QNH? How does the drone operator measure its height? I would like a bit more separation.

At worst he guesses at best he'll have a GPS derived height. The regs talk about 400agl but modelling suggests there may be as much as a 200 ft discrepancy between baro and GPS height in extreme situations. Heads up!

 

In class G you are on your own, in D and C the RPA must be seaprated as if it were another aircraft, if ATC are even aware of it.

 

 

• Husaberg 650 Supermotard - an extremely crazy motard!!! Soooo much fun!!!
   
   
  

 

 

 

Mal

Impressive history Mal!

 

Gotta give the 650 'Berg a , biggest grin factor of any bike I've ridden.

 

 

Um...... ads-b?English may help with that.

Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast

 

Not really English yet is it, try, http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/projects/ads-b/

 

 

Quite right Camel, VOR not NDB as I stated. My bad.

 

The VHF ATIS project has been initiated but is not progressing very quickly due to other priorities, and yes it will be in the Comm band.

 

Sorry I know thats no relief for now, you'll have to rely on your friends in TWR or ML CEN a little longer.

 

 

Albury ATIS is broadcast over the NDB and rubbish reception has been an issue for years.

 

A project has been in the pipeline for some time to install a dedicated VHF transmitter for the ATIS. Should be done by now, will get an update tomorrow.

 

 

I had no issue with logging in separately to Clear Prop and would use it again in the future.

 

One advantage of maintaining the separate identities is that they are easily severable if you choose to dispose of or discontinue one or the other. Merging the two seems to me to be muddying the waters.

 

 

Presumably the authorities have been doing their best to apprehend this flagrant violator of airspace rules.

Nah, the cunning old bugger has a fist full of exemptions from regulators around the globe. Its a conspiracy I tells ya.

 

 

Thats some coffee table you have.

 

Welcome Skee

 

 

After two months grounded due to work I thought a circuit session was in order yesterday.

 

Two shockers in a row first up and I was asking myself what Im doing up here, greased the next few and I was over that and planning a pre Xmas cross country.