Jump to content

NovemberFoxtrot

Members
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NovemberFoxtrot

  1. Shags.. already done mate.. Brisbane Flying Group have two 172S's.. well organized group and I used to fly them when they had the grummans.they currently have 44 members and shares come available from time to time and can certainly make flying more economical.. you never know.. If they get more membership enquiries, they might go buy some more..

    I'd be happier if the bris Flying group accepted a RPL :( I just havnt had the time to upgrade to PPL yet.

     

     

  2. NF, thanks for that. It's a sign of the times CASA having to publish a document to explain what's in the reg's! Why people don't just read the AIP etc is beyond me. By the omission of the [instructions] note in AIP ENR 12.3 the intent may be lost and pilots only reading the guide will embarrass themselves at places like Albury, Coffs etc.

    Its true, I trained at Archer, and then found SunnyCoast and Coffs a bit different when I went there. Nothing insurmountable, but definitely quirky. Helped to listen to LiveATC prior so i had an idea what i was in for.

     

     

    • Agree 1
  3. would have though you would need a clearance. Normally such things require a readback. No? Nev

    No, there's implied clearance to enter class d CTR, by the tower simply acknowledging you.

     

    ESTABLISHING TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS

     

    When an aircraft contacts ATC at a class D aerodrome and provides sufficient information about track, position, level, and intentions, ATC may give a clearance to enter the airspace by simply acknowledging the transmission with the aircraft’s callsign. Alternatively, a clearance may be denied, or afforded by an alternate route or level as instructed by ATC. Such instructions may include ‘join crosswind’, ‘overfly’, or ‘report at [position]’. The acknowledgment authorises the aircraft to enter the class D airspace following the stated track and level, or any alternative instruction given by ATC. Pilots are then required to maintain two-way communications with ATC and comply with any subsequent ATC instructions.

     

     

     

    This shortened procedure does not eliminate the availability of a ‘traditional’ airways clearance. However, it provides an abbreviated clearance option for use when both pilot and ATC understand the proposed course of action.

     

     

    • Agree 2
    • Informative 3
  4. See, thats what I had issues with.. I did as part of my Flight Review a flight into CTA from Archerfield (Class D) to Goldie (Class C), and likewise I did a transit flight on the way back from Lismore

     

    The problem came up when you read the form for the endorsement it says "Pass in the aeronautical knowledge examination for the endorsement". CASA indicated to me that the only way to meet that requirement was for a pass in the PPL exam.. which i think is ridiculous.

     

    I was granted my CTR, just not CTA

     

     

    • Like 1
  5. So what is interesting is at the moment I dont seem to be able to find a Flight School that will sign off on a CTA endorsement for a RPL. Ive been constantly told that there is no "exam" you can do to meet the knowledge requirement for them to sign off on the paperwork to get a CTA endorsement. I even had one of the licensing guys from CASA confirm this. Have other people managed to get a CTA endo on their RPL? In Brisbane?

     

     

    • Informative 1
  6. Hi NF,I notice what looks like a top curtain or blind for shade!

    Gday Phil, As far as I'm aware, it came with the plane, but I do know that its just two suction cups at each end. Ill see if i can find a brand on it when im down at the school next.

     

    Not me. Must have been on break (know who it is though, not on these boards)

    Ah shame! Either way, I appreciate the work you guys do! :D

     

    And thanks again to everyone for the feed back :D

     

     

    • Like 1
  7. Ive got 40hrs in the c162. (One of the ones that PFA had written off in the storms too).

     

    I havnt flown the C150 or the C152 to compare to it, but i didnt find them all that sensitive. Responsive, but not overly sensitive. Ive been in the C172's the last few weeks converting to RPL, and it feels very similar to me. Id flow the J170's before and didn't notice much difference when converting from it to the C162.

     

     

  8. Coincidence that i decide i need to understand radio better and I get to the forum and its one of the active artciles!!

     

    I understand class d well enough (or so i think), but i must admit im a bit hazy on the process to go from a Class D aerodrome through Class G to a Class C aerodrome (such as Archerfield YBAF to Gold Coast YBCG), any guides that explain that kind of scenario? Ive got a little book that has a lot of scenarios in it (Aviation Theory Centres Visual Flight Guide) but i still find it quiet unclear as to the process of getting entering..

     

    I think it consists of when outside YBAF's class D, that i contact Brisbane Centre and request clearance, at which point i believe they will give me a squawk and some directions.. but I don't quite get at what point i should contact them..

     

    Any where to look at for good reading?

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...