Jump to content

TechMan

Members
  • Posts

    257
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TechMan

  1. I suggest you take this matter up with the airport operator

    That would make more sense, as it is fairly commonly known that Mr Snow doesn't want smaller aircraft on his airport (ie GA). Unfortunately, it is his airport and he can pretty much do as he wants. A result of the Government selling off their assets for a pittance.

     

     

  2. Hi All,We, the board and office staff copped a lot of flack by a very small minority of members by going electronic here, but we have saved your organization tens of thousands of dollars that can be better spent elsewhere

    John,

     

    Perhaps a matrix of possible ways of where the Board may spend the tens of thousands of saved dollars would be good to know as a member

     

    Chris

     

     

  3. All those things you mention facthunter are true, but with good operating techniques you can reduce your risks and wet appendages!One of the reasons floating hulls are better than float aircraft in our domain (LSA), is that you don't have to carry the extra weight of floats even with the allowed increase in Max TOW... your hull will support you OK. RAAus regs already allow for retracts in that scenario.

    It depends what domain you are referring to (I am assuming amateur built/certificated factory built). I have not seen any reg changes from the CASA side regarding retract for Light Sport Aircraft even though the US have ammended their regs. I believe it is on the CASA 'to do' list, but with sport aviation having a bee's empenage of 1%'s priority within CASA, it will need to be hassled to get the change for retracts on waterborne aircraft through for our rules regarding LSA. At the moment it will still be repositionable undercarriage. Maybe someone knows more?

     

    A good amphib plane to consider for a smaller price that the Freedom could be the Super Petrel from Brazil, being imported by Ken Horlock. He will have his first kit finished soon and will be bringing them in as LSA shortly afterwards.

     

    Chris

     

     

  4. Thanks Team,

     

    I say Team as I see it as more of a team effort, keeping our freedoms and keeping our aircraft flying. Sometimes we do get into each others hair from time to time, though generally we are going in the same direction.

     

    I will certainly not disappear from the forums, may have to change my username now though, and am always there should someone need info or clarification on things that I can help with. I hope that I have done a reasonable job. I know that I missed returning some calls and failed to answer some emails.

     

    I certainly hope that RA-Aus fills the seat expeditiously, as it is needed, though I am sure there won't be a problem.

     

    Wishing you all well and happy and safe flying.

     

    Now I can sit on the other side of the phone and make demands of the office staff :thumb_up:

     

    I am off for a week now first to NQld to soak some sun rays before coming back to clear the icicles.

     

    Take care

     

    Chris 002_wave.gif.62d5c7a07e46b2ae47f4cd2e61a0c301.gif

     

     

  5. Ozzie - Provisional rego is usually the time between initial inspection of an amateur built aircraft and the completion of the test period finalisation form, once the test period hours have been flown off. Provisional rego is subject to the Annex which will have been sent out with the provisional rego certificate.

     

    J430 - LP/HP is cut off at a normal cruise speed of 80kts. Yes, the new Ops Manual will cover that. The Gazelle sits on the fence and so you should end up with HP and LP (in my view). If people want to add endoresements that they have from GA or other source, then a copy of the endoresement entry in your logbook will need to be sent to the office.

     

    If youhave time in a LP aircraft like Thruster / Drifter etc, or HP like the esqual / J230 etc and it is not registered on your certificate, by all means, call the office, or fax a copy of the missing aircraft log book page showing flights in said aircraft and get the staff to add the endorsement on to your certificate.

     

    Chris

     

     

  6. thats good i have been trying to work it out for a while, so confusing. sure i saw the word "reciprocating" in there somewhere. what would be the requirements/ guidlines for the following fuel types.

     

    high amperage /capacity batteries. LPG/natrual gas, compressed air.

     

    any chance on permitting turbines. love a couple of 50lb olympus R/C turbines for the Lazair:big_grin: those pioneers are definatly heading for the bin.

    Hi Ozzie,

     

    I haven't seen any guidelines etc as yet for electrics / compressed gasses etc. Hydrogen or other gases, as a fuel for an engine, would possibly be a problem due to the containment arrangements, although Rutan managed to create a composite engine for his starship, so anything is possible. It will be a question of $$$.

     

    The olympus jet is currently being used on various sailplanes, the latest being the Ventus-2cxa from Schempp-Hirth Sailplanes. The downside to the jets currently is the noise, the fuel burn and the lack of climb rate for heavier aircraft. You might end up burning holes in the wings on the Lazair 006_laugh.gif.0f7b82c13a0ec29502c5fb56c616f069.gif

     

    Chris

     

     

  7. The auf.asn.au should still get you there.

     

    The real reason was that we had a change of IP address from our service providers and the DNS for the raa.asn.au domain name needed updating. This was done, though it needs a bit of time to filter through the net.

     

    Chris

     

     

  8. The issue is the stall speed for aircraft under RA-Aus.

     

    As I have written in the magazine, the flight manual for, say, the J400 (as a 2 seater) states that the stall speed at MTOW is 52kts (from memory). Therefore, even at a 760kg limit for RA-Aus, the J400 will still not be legally allowed to fly at 700kg, as the stall speed will not comply. Unless of course someone can prove through data and flight testing that enhancement work does actually bring the stall speed back.

     

    It will be a matter of working out the stall speed for aircraft types to see at what theoretical weight the aircraft would stall at 45kts CAS Vso. Remembering that stall speed is calculated at the most forward CG limit.

     

    Chris

     

     

  9. I see no reason to approach CASA for an exemption as the only requirement for CAO95.55 para 1.5 and 1.6 aircraft is that they are fitted with 1 propeller and 1 engine. It does not specify that it must be reciprocating.

     

    Even LSA does not make that specification, only non turbine.

     

    Chris

     

     

  10. Board nominations are currently being sought and are encouraged.

     

    If I may be so bold to take some text from Tony's post for a campaign slogan:

     

    Come and join the team and be part of the controlling crew so that you can have your say on what the hell happens within RA-Aus, at Board level!

     

    Nominations close 30 May 2008.

     

    If you don't feel you can donate your valuable time by being a board member, then get paid to be a controller and apply for the Operations Manager position which is advertised in the magazine. That way, you can sort the "twaddle" out yourself.

     

    088_censored.gif.2b71e8da9d295ba8f94b998d0f2420b4.gif

     

     

  11. RockoSo you think too many gadgets is never enough...... how about 3 x GPS VOR ADF DME (except its U/S) and to top it off a tablet PC running all mapping and Jepp software with a GPS link so its all real time.

     

     

    Now I know brent has central locking and an alarm, and a big stereo!

     

    How would a little J120 cope with all this stuff:laugh:

     

    OK......I am outa here :rotary:

     

    J

    All you need now is an autopilot with a remote link to your desktop so that you can sit at home and control your aircraft which is having all the fun of flying.

     

    :black_eye:

     

     

  12. The RAA do not yield very much info at all. I know the problem with fatals etc, police not ATSB ....however the incidents and accidents part of the mag is hardly in depth is it. Its nothing more than a summary.

    Sometimes RA-Aus doesn't get more than one or two lines on an incident/accident report form.

     

    Yes, you are right, the pilot notes are generally an accurate summary of what happened. Generally, if the cause of the problem is known, it gets published as well.

     

    Regards

     

    Chris

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...