Jump to content

jackc

Members
  • Posts

    2,072
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Posts posted by jackc

  1. This is something that most Ultralight  Pilots fly to, but is relevant to larger aircraft, too

     

     https://www.facebook.com/100063952303049/posts/pfbid02heLF1QFqrFtp9farsGNXQVyNMJr6fu6mTC3HJonk9bvhczHGk99Noz5ZnX7fsFLgl/?

     

    An instance for me, I was doing Glider training at Benalla in an ASK21, My instructor came from France for the Gliding Season.

    Unfortunately, myself and  EVA did not get along too well. 🤢

    We get the aero tow from the LS1 V8 powered Pawnee, and we are away. Here I am doing as she asked fly out near Lake Makoan, she is not happy and in a terse voice say ‘you are gonna kill us both’  rest of the lesson was less than ordinary.

    Next flight she decides I don’t need much in the way of instrumentation. 
    Pre take off instrument check I say ‘panel inoperative, instruments missing, don’t need ‘em anyway ‘

    Cut  the air with a chainsaw 🤩 terse instructions  to fly the lesson.

    God part was, I greased the landing and not a word was said……

    Who needs instruments?  Fly by the seat of you pants, worked for me 🤩

     

     

    IMG_1423.jpeg

    IMG_1401.jpeg

  2. The more I read of this thread and similar.  It’s never an open and shut case favouring Aviation.  Airports are seen as a potential money makers for alternative uses, not tied to Aviation. And Local Govt entities are usually up to their ears in less then ethical dealings. 
     

    • Like 2
  3. 4 hours ago, facthunter said:

    You had a bit of luck riding with you. It used to be called "scud" running.  Nev

    I would never make Commercial Pilot, if I did not like weather on the day, I would say this 747 ain’t going anywhere and I would be fired in a heartbeat.  On any given day, I don’t have to fly anywhere if I don’t have most things in my favour, but having said that, I make the risk assessment even IF it was a string bag Part 103 machine. 

    • Like 1
  4. I had a horrible incident as a right seat passenger in a A36 Bonanza 42 years ago, the VFR Pilot (my boss at the time) A weather front came up enroute to Archerfield from Rockhampton.  We got to Gayndah and I figured he would land there, no he wanted to keep going, 

    I said make left turn, me being the pseudo navigator with a fist full of charts and not even half a clue at what I was doing .

    We go to the coast…….we got there with cloud down to 700ft. I said turn right at the beach and keep the sand on the right and the water on the left. He was visibly worried and I could honestly see it ending horribly bad. He ended up calling at Maroochydore on the radio and we were down to 600ft 🤢   He made a raggy landing because he was badly stressed. 
    I will never forget that day, ever. We got a ride to Brisbane, I picked up a new Merc 2224 prime mover and drove home.

    Th Boss got grounded there for 3 days and I believe he got roasted for making the flight.  

    • Informative 1
  5. 7 minutes ago, BrendAn said:

    I am not getting my point across. 

    Training is always a good idea.

    I am saying part 103 is aircraft that you don't need a licence to fly as jack has been talking about for ages.

    Now he is saying he would like a certificate for it.  ,?

    When you do any recognised training, even if not needed.  You get a certificate.  I got my first at 5 years old for Learning to Swim, 

    at the Harden-Murrumbarrah swimming pool in 1957. Did I need it? NO….but I have  not drowned , thus far in my life 🤩

  6. I mean this is a doable dream for me, I have done many crazy things in my life and I am still here 🤩

    ANY kind of training no matter what is a bonus. A training  certificate is something, I can chalk up as an achievement. 
    and count it as done 🤩

    I have always been a minimalist person and had achievements in life doing a lot, with less. Hence I will never own a Dodge RAM.

    I drove  a Suzuki 4x4 to many parts of Australia nearly 50 years ago, many people laughed at me, and said all sorts of things.

     

     

    IMG_1537.jpeg

    • Winner 1
  7. All I can say is…….look at how the U.S. plan works under the FAA? They just keep progressing, albeit with some hiccups, this Mosaic plan they have,  is being adopted by Brazil, now.  Our Aviation regulator still has its head office in Jurassic Park, next to the Dinosaur enclosure. 
    RAAus has no real respect as an organisation from me, however some good people work in the organisation and it should not be a Company, and it should wholly comply with part 149, and there are organisations looking to pressure that.

    Turbs, its the other way round, I would allege that YOu pass stuff from here to RAA, that’s WHY I lay baits here 🤩

    I know my ugly face is the centre target in the RAA lunch room dart board……I am a pin cushion 👍 

    As far as FAR Part  103 is concerned, I will always champion  that sector for adoption in Australia, even if illegal.

    You do know illegal is a sick bird 🤩. You see, this forum is a sounding board and certain people don’t like certain opinions, then we have the Snitches, bored little wannabes who would love to be out flying, but can’t and they want to pull people down having fun. 
    I have been in Aviation for 5 minutes, as time goes on it’s becoming a bigger sh1tfight, and do gooder attitudes don’t help.

    Turbs, you have no idea how I work, I have NO qualifications, I have single handedly solve an engineering problem for one of the largest auto companies in the World, the sent 2 of there head office executive to my house and we sat around a table worked out a fix and then executed it.

    I have walked into Govt Departments single handedly and provided reports etc and had Govt legislation changed, all the while making long standing friends while at it.  
    I don’t care what you, Turbs or anyone else say about me, iI will go on living life and having fun.

    ‘ Canberra Approach’. This is String Bag 1 requesting permission to land…….String Bag 1 is that you sitting on Taxiway J?  Yes correct Canberra Approach did not want to inconvenience anyone in the pattern, so I thought easiest to land here.  String Bag 1, please taxi to side terminal area, and proceed to tower, as they want to talk  to you, (jingle of handcuffs heard in background).  Mmmmm…..looks like I have a bed tonight, not in a place of my choosing 🤩

     

    • Like 1
  8. I have spent today thinking about this, thanks Thruster88🤩  Well maybe I need to execute a dream for 2025…..

    Go to the U.S. buy a s/hand FAA FAR Part 103 machine, do some training and get signed off and then complete the approval process to fly into  AirVenture 2025 and attend.  Might be able to volunteer while there 🤩 

    Then fly out, disassemble the machine and ship it home 👍👍 

    I would fly in from Rapid City SD, I have  a friend there and could use it as a staging point. 
     Have friends in the EAA of which I am a member for the last 4 years, I am sure they will help me.

    Updated requirements needed…..need to stay tuned in 😎

     

     

     

    IMG_3717.jpeg

    • Like 1
    • Winner 1
×
×
  • Create New...