Jump to content

Oksinay

Members
  • Posts

    81
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Oksinay

  1. I flew and passed my PPL flight exam in September, and submitted that in November to satisfy the BFR requirement and was refused. RAA was happy to take my money however...just not to recognise the PPL test as evidence of satisfying the BFR.

     

     

  2. The ABC satire Utopia was widely regarded by public servants and others in the know as a documentary, it so closely reflected the actual workings of many departments. Bill Gates has commented often that he is quite prepared to give more of his income to society, but he doesn't want to pay more tax because governments are too inefficient at redistribution.

     

     

  3. First you need to prepare for the GFPT, which I found much like the RAA pilot certificate but in a heavier ac. Then do the PPL theory exam, which I found quite a big test. Then do the PPL flight test which is much like the nav endo for your PC.

     

    I did the CTR endo later, easier than mixing it in with the test if you don't have to.

     

    The real trick is to do your PC with a school that also does GA training. Only one BAK for example, and GA discipline from the start.

     

    Cheers

     

     

  4. I don't know. Is it? Do you have the figures that show that those companies have higher levels of union membership than average? Have you looked at all businesses that fail in this country, and checked the level of union membership?Maybe the common thread is that the boards of those companies was ineffective. Maybe it was the high Australian dollar recently. Maybe in some cases it was the parent company setting up shop in the next cheapest emerging economy to boost profits. Maybe it was a range of things, some under the control of the company's management, some not, but solely putting the blame on unions is simplistic in the extreme.

    Almost universal coverage at alll the mentioned enterprises, that's why I said "a common thread". It's obviously not just IR, and I certainly don't blame people seeking to address the natural imbalance of power in an employee/employer relationship, but rather the almost lemming like behaviour by industrial organisations of constantly seeking more for less until the host organism dies (hows that for some mixed metaphors!)

     

     

    • Agree 2
  5. Here we go again, union membership is at an all-time low in this country but somehow they're still responsible for all the woes. I really don't understand this insistence that everything should be left to market forces and this will somehow result in flourishing industry. You want to follow the Gina Rinehart model, strip away all limitations on wage and conditions, and make your companies profitable by paying $2 an hour? Yes, your company will be competitive on the world stage. Yes, it may even make massive profits and provide employment. But who benefits? The people working for the company? No, they're still screwed. The only people who benefit are the investors and the management team. Then you have the gap between rich and poor widening.This may be your idea of paradise, fair enough, go start a company in Bangladesh and enjoy your profits.

    Union memebership is at an all time low - but not at Qantas,Toyota,GMH, SPCA. Dear me, is that a common thread?

     

     

    • Agree 1
    • Caution 1
  6. I think firing that useless little Irish git and his complete board would be a good start. After that, get in some management who don't cook the books, keep 10 A320's in Toulouse for months at USD$400,000 per month waiting for them to get the Japan Jetstar route going, and throw little hissy fits grounding the entire fleet when faced with industrial action.An Australian company - and icon, our national carrier, that carries a goddamn kangaroo on the tail - talking about firing 5,000 staff and seeking to remove restrictions that prevent the majority of the company to be sold off to overseas buyers... no wonder its employees want to strike. And we should support them. If Air New Zealand can post a 200 million dollar PROFIT in the last half year then perhaps Qantas management should be learning from them instead of making one bad decision after another.[/quote

     

    Have you seen the wages at ANZ? And the productivity? I wonder what the difference is? The lack of 54 EBA,s perhaps? Being able to run a a business without being hamstrung by adversial unions that have a legal system that underpins them?

  7. It seems to me that Qantas is neither fish nor fowl in its structure and it either needs to be a full market enterprise without ownership and management restrictions, or back to a public utility and government owned.

     

    Government ownership does not have a great track record once any competition is involved leaving fill and free market ownership and management as the solution.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...