Jump to content

Mazda

Members
  • Posts

    987
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Mazda

  1. The establishment on 5 mile final wasn't planned to be in the CTAF rules - it was something wanted apparently by airline pilots. Hopefully in future this will be changed back to the original plan, which will mean you won't need to be established that far out. A 5 mile final is fine if you are flying an airline jet but it isn't really necessary in a small aircraft!

     

    At the moment though, the rules say we need to do it.

     

     

  2. Hi Matt

     

    I'd love to catch up but I can't make it this weekend ... I'm off to Bathurst to do my instrument rating (only 6 IF hours to go). I was hoping my OH could fly down and meet you there if I couldn't make it but he has to work, so unfortunately not this time!

     

    Maybe next time!

     

     

  3. Flight following is on a workload permitting basis, which is why there is no charge. So feel free to use it, it's there to help you. If the controller is too busy they'll say it isn't available. As it is a radar service they can give you more than just traffic. Remember they can give navigational assistance too.

     

     

  4. I don't think I put down any weight info for the 115. MTOW is 748kg. Aerobatic MTOW is 703kg. Empty weight is just under 500kg. So it is better if you and the pax are on the lighter side for aeros.

     

    There's plenty of room though for bigger people though, it's quite comfy. The seat is fixed so you always have the same perspective - the rudder pedals are adjusted instead. There's a single spade type stick in the centre with a padded armrest between the seats.

     

    I've never had any trouble with the canopy sliding forward! Mine seems to stay put quite well. You can fly with an open canopy below 70 knots (not that I've tried).

     

    They have "flapperons" - i.e. the ailerons droop down to give extra flap, and there's also flap under the fuselage. So the angle of flap in degrees doesn't sound like much, but they are in effect full span.

     

    The stall warning only works when the flaps are down.

     

    There's only one fuel tank so fuel management is easy, but the weird little segmented dipstick takes a bit of getting used to!

     

    Things to look out for ... there's a spar check which involves removing the wings (!), but it's possible to not do this if an inspection panel has been put in. Find out if the one you are looking at has had the panel put in. The fuel tank has a rubber bladder which will deteriorate over time and need to be replaced, so find out when this was last done. There's an AD on the "waggler box" I think it is called, under the stick. See if that's been done. There's also an AD on the magnetos I think, which need inspection periodically. The aircraft with Cleveland brakes are better than the originals.

     

    Alan Wood at Hoxton Park (Sydney) is the guru and type specific parts are available through him.

     

     

  5. I have one, so what would you like to know?

     

    Fantastic little things. Originally the design was entered into a UK competition for a new trainer and the design won.

     

    To cut a long story short, the design was picked up by the Victa Lawnmowing company, who started manufacturing 100hp models, then moved into 115 models. They were so popular that they outsold Cessna, Piper and Beechcraft combined! So Piper and Cessna bought one to examine, then updated their models, slashed the prices and flooded the market. Meanwhile Victa had made one 4 seat Aircruiser, which never went into production. The little Aussie company couldn't compete with the Americans and asked the Government for help. This was refused, so Victa went back to Lawnmowers and sold the design to NZ.

     

    New Zealand manufactured the aircraft and also sold a 150hp version. They modified the Aircruiser design to be the CT/4. Believe it or not, the Aussie Government then bought back the CT/4 to train RAAF pilots!

     

    Back to the Airtourer. It's a 2 seat trainer, easy enough for ab initio, and fun enough for basic aeros. The bigger engine versions do quite nice aeros, the 115s take a while to climb to altitude but they are very sweet handling. Great visibility. Not that fast, maybe 100 knots (they'd be faster with flush rivets!)

     

    They are cute things which seem to have a bit of personality.

     

    A New Zealander by the name of Cliff Tait flew a 115hp one around the world in 1969. It was the smallest aircraft to have achieved such a feat in those days. He had just 240 hours total time before he made that trip, and the aircraft didn't ever let him down.

     

     

  6. I'm a GA pilot and use the following.

     

    BUMFISH for a downwind check. Note that it has to be adapted slightly to each type with common sense. "Fuel" could be on and sufficient, through to fuel pump on, fullest tank selected and quantity sufficient. "Instruments" includes engine and flight instruments.

     

    Then I have a couple of pre-landing checks. Initially I was taught Mixture, Pitch, Gear (which has still stuck because I started with this check) but the more common one is PUF (Pitch, Undercarriage, flaps). You can make it PUFC if you are using carby heat in the circuit.

     

    After landing and on taxiway I do FROST. Flaps Identified and raised, fuel pump off. Radios (frequency, call if required), Oil temps and pressures, switches (turn everything off that is not required - landing light, strobes, navaids) and SARTIME (cancel if required), Transponder to standby (and reset code to 1200/2000).

     

    (By the way, BUMFISH is also a great pre emergency landing checklist, just think in terms of shutting down though - so undercarriage up or down as required, Mixture is idle cut off, fuel off, instruments could be ELT, all switches off, hatches cracked, harness secure etc).

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...