Jump to content

Nobody

Members
  • Posts

    720
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Nobody

  1. That's true but there will always be a fine line between personal opinion & offensive.There in lies the dilemma, to some such comments maybe offense but to others it's being direct, truthful in their own way.

    And yet here is a thread that was started by Neil who is offended....

     

     

    • Agree 1
  2. Whilst I agree it's rather obvious that the composition of this persons posts are lacking in proper execution it bothers me none as such things aren't that important in today's fast moving society where even some media personal as well as some high profile people speak appallingly! Proper grammar etc is over rated!:-)

    Punctuation isn't important when the message is understood. The problem comes when the lack of punctuation means that messages are misinterpreted. There is a reason that propper radio procedures are followed in the air, to prevent missunderstandings. The same applies to written communication.

     

    Neil's original posts (since edited by the mods) were pretty poor form. He implied that a pilot was "brain dead" for not having a PLB, in a thread about a missing aircraft ( and pilot). At the time not even the the most basic details of the situation had been confirmed.

     

    It's good that Neil is passionate about safety. It would be good if he could be a little bit less obnoxious about where and what he says.

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 3
  3. given a caution for my post please explainthe (edited..mod)

    facts are there if the plane is missing as assumed

     

    now as a fact when the PLB was first mooted I was one that said that it SHOULD BE IN THE PLANE FOR ALL FLIGHTS no ifs or buts

     

    when a transport company has their 153 trucks on tracking why cant you have the same device on your plane neil

    Neil,

     

    I gave your post a caution. It is far too early to speculate on if the pilot carried an ELT/PLB when all that is known at this stage is that an aircraft is reported overdue. It may be safely on the ground somewhere out of phone range having diverted or it may be much worse. At this sage noone knows. (edited..mod)

     

    At least wait until the media have done some wild speculation before doing it yourself, or wait for accurate reports and investigations.

     

    Nobody

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Agree 7
  4. Can't see how it can be reliable with the same built up crank and cases.

    In the video they address the crank shafts. They claim to have a procedure to weld up the pressed together crankshaft. Interesting idea if it works....

     

     

  5. A couple of point that are possibly relevant to the discussion.

     

    1. The original post mentions that the plan was to seek LSA status. That would mean that the aircraft could be factory built. This would open up the designer to much more liability than if the aircraft were just available in a kit/experimental form.

     

    2. One way to deal with the liability is for the engineer to be "employed" by Raytol's company rather than contracting to it via the engineers company. Raytols company would need insurance to cover the design and manufacture of aircraft instead of just the manufacture component.

     

     

  6. I don't know if this the correct forum but.The T51 with the ls3 I believe is a VH only plane. What is the procedure for building and rego and maintaining this aircraft if it's home built. What I'm asking is it a bridge to far for Mr Average. I'm familiar with the building and flying of the RAA planes.

    Thanks Lyndon

    The procedure is fairly straightforward and done though SAAA. They have Technical Counselors who can provide advice and guidance during the build and Authorised Persons who can issue the CofA. You need a CASA issued licence to fly it(ie RPL or PPL) and will have to complete the Maintenance Procedures Course(MPC) to maintain it.

     

     

  7. Even Vans match hole isn't match hole in reality, you have to do some work to claim it as your own build, so I should allocate some of the fabrication to the easiest and most fool proof processes.Of course then a bigger fool will come along ...

    Make the user do the fabrication on the easiest bit to ship. I screwed up an alieron spar. $20 part, shipping...... 10 times that had I not had another box coming later....

     

     

    • Informative 1
  8. 100% correct, basically my understanding of the process with sids is Cessna recommended the inspections for the aircraft, and casa issued an airworthiness directive making them mandatory. With the exception of the extensions applied for private ops, no SIDS means you are no longer in compliance with the aircraft certificate of airworthiness, and hence no longer airworthy. This would still apply if the aircraft was on the RAA register.

    The cessna inspections are recommended but not mandatory elsewhere in the world. In the USA there is no AD requiring them and it is left to owners and A&P(LAME in FAA world) to decide to what extent you need to follow them. If you have a pristine single owner aircraft that lives in a hangar 500ks from the ocean you can ignore them if you chose to.

     

    CASA decided that there was no wiggle room and that therefore they would be a mandatory requirement at great expense to some owners.

     

     

  9. This is what I liked about the system in the USA, they teach you how to fly in class D and then they are all the same. Once you have 1 sorted you can go anywhere.

     

    Over there class C works the same everywhere too. Fly into Fayetteville with your instructor and work it out, then Savannah, Huntsville or Norfolk are all the same.

     

     

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...