Jump to content

Jim McDowall

Members
  • Posts

    589
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Jim McDowall

  1. On the subject of why a Part 149 organisation or its agents/ officers should not get involved in accident investigation the submission of  Commodore A.R. (Drew) McKinnie, RANR to the Aviation Safety Regulation Review Panel  https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/aviation/asrr/submissions/files/115_a_mckinnie_29_jan_2014_redacted.pdf

    , particularly pages 5 and 6, instructive

     

    • Informative 1
    • Winner 1
  2. Thanks for the info and pics. Will track down a local Aeropup and have a look but at first glance the Aeropup seats do not match the drawings in the Supa Pup builders manual. 

  3. On 18/04/2021 at 9:54 AM, jackc said:

    CASA and /or  RAAus could create a 100 page manual from that one page

    The problem is bureacrats write the regulations requiring manuals to be approved by CASA with little instruction as to what has to be in the manuals. The likes of RAAus, GFA etc set out to impress CASA with how diligent they are and write extensive manuals which sometimes are in conflict with the law or often internally conflicted. They submit them to CASA who after numerous internal conferences and communications with the proponents eventually get an approval of a document that contain errors in law or otherwise.

    This approach generates a lot of internal activity for CASA employees that justifies their existence.

    Those of you with nothing better to do should read Sue Woods (of Jabiru fame) evidence to a senate committee earlier this year which illustrates the outside view of CASA's approach to the outside world at https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=committees/commsen/9146706b-6e31-4a9f-9fad-1b3fca2f099c/&sid=0006 

  4. All this confusion of aircraft classes adds weight to my argument that all RAAus aircraft in private operations should be "experimental" category. This would absolve CASA of any liability(and pobably RAAus) under CASR 203.??? as all VH "experimental" aircraft are already. No need for any BS compliance with arbitary standards that create un-necessary silos and increased administrative load. 

    • Like 2
  5. 20 hours ago, Jaba-who said:

    But a small percentage might have a tumour in the brain which fairly suddenly causes a seizure or a stroke. 

    And there is a group in the population who are wandering around with a brain anurism that they are unaware of. They can go "pop" at any point in time with immediate incapacitation and probably death. I've seen it happen.

  6. 53 minutes ago, Yenn said:

    There has been a large amount of time and money expended

    RAAus paid a lot of money only to have the GFA sponge on its work and decide to "copy and paste" RAAus's P.149 work product - also agreed to pay a consultant who I believe did work for RAAus's Part 149 exposition (application?) $10K to assist with the process. (see GFA minutes August 2020). At that stage RAAus's exposition was not in the public domain.

  7. From Flight Safety, August 2017:

    Unlike the US and some other countries, there is no legislated upper age limit in Australia or New Zealand for airline pilots, providing they continue to meet the relevant medical standards and other requirements. But because they must comply with the age restrictions of the countries to which they are flying, older airline pilots are effectively restricted to domestic or Trans-Tasman operations.

  8. 2 minutes ago, Jaba-who said:

    I read just a few weeks ago that Compulsory retirement is 65 for airline pilots.

    In Australia you cant compulsorily retire someone on the basis of age. I know of a guy who was flying 737 freighters until recently at the age of 73 and it was only COVID that stopped him (or his employers) flying.

  9. 11 minutes ago, Jaba-who said:

    Wouldn’t  have thought truck drivers (of just standard trucks) would need passenger privileges. 

    You need that privilege to pick up hitchhikers.

    The good part about the NZ initiative is that if you already have the required licence you do not need to do a special medical to fly.

×
×
  • Create New...