damkia

Are you suggesting that those who are close to MTOW without this stuff, diet, so that they can carry documentation without exceeding MTOW?

Well that would be great if it was clear what is required, just look at the thread on ozrunways, so why don't help us dumb asses to be safe ,what regs lay out exactly what we have to carry,,,now ,no opinions just the regs ,

Whilst not explicitly stated that you have to carry them, it makes sense that you should be able to show evidence of doing the flight planning and have documentation of such on hand per the regs.

I'm kinda wondering when it'll change from "smileys and just for education" to " here's a fine for non compliance " and " have a nice day you have thirty days to pay that"

Maybe this is what they are trying to instill in people - that they ARE around and ARE checking, so it would be advisable to get YOUR airmanship in order. You can't blame them for your lack of preparation.

It's all starting to sound a bit like GA don't you think?

I suspect it is to keep an eye on RA-Aus compliance and checks too - to see if they are up to scratch in discharging their delegated duties. If too many planes and pilots are not compliant with the rules and regs, then it would be viewed as a more systemic issue better approached higher up than with the pilots concerned. It does sound like another round of more "on the ground" audits may be occurring.

North Qld Newsagents are very slow - we just got the edition that contained a story about some guy named Wright who invented something that may have a future.

Could it be to follow up with the training organisation that you used to ensure they are actually covering the requirements with sufficient depth and importance in their training? That would be my first impression, if you were not actually penalised, and they implied that it was a form of audit. Audits are used to capture what is going wrong, not necessarily to punish who is doing it wrong. It is more of a "systems approach" to fixing problems.

oh OOOhhh - there's three Bobs.

Was three Bobs worth, now only worth one Bob.........

Price of Bobs must be equal to the price of gold...

Funny you should say that...it was only about 180 secs ago I said to Corrine "I NEED A BREAK" ...we only just fixed the last of the known issues from the server move about 20mins ago so all should be starting to look good

Happy Valley awaits........

I am currently talking to the server admin guy that will be performing this work, different one from before but this guy runs a data centre filled with sites that use the same software as us.

Such a pity we don't have a "green with envy" smilie.....

Looks like a fun trip...

"- Rotorcraft Usergroup Forum

- Powered Chutes etc Usergroup Forum

- Gliders and Soaring Aircraft Usergroup Forum

- Warbirds, Vintage and Classic Aircraft Forum

- Aerobatics Forum

- Rotary Wing Usergroup Forum

- Flying Model Aircraft Usergroup Forum",

and most GA?

All <500post under "Miscellaneous" as a similar sub category structure to RA/GA types, as they are not that popular/frequented. If they become more used you could pop them out into their own primary category.

Er.... I think the one pictured may put me slightly over MTOW.

So Ian,

How is your hired help's treatment going at Happy Valley?

( )

2:01 pm Anxiety begins with incompatible OS and database

7:48 pm System administrator appears to have aged 10 years in one day, caffeine infusion by intravenous drip commences.

3:52 am Ambulance and police called to attend a disturbance from within a house by a psychotic individual screaming obscenities and verbally threatening to kill something/someone. On arrival a second person seen to be cowering in a foetal position in the corner of a room with parts of a server scattered all over the floor.

Two weeks later: Happy Valley treatment is going well....

________________________________________________________

Seriously, all the best with the upgrade

(Reporter Sum Yung Guy)

"G'day mate. I'm looking for Sum Yung Guy..."

"What is his name?.."

We do have a perpetual motion machine in our house....

"NO WUZZU'S" also needed.

I suggest you wait a few weeks then I'll show you something else to get excited about.I am sitting here right now redoing some prior art for the 3rd time so the stupid Chinese patent company obviously can see what is non-obvious, which is obviously obvious to me obviously, but not obviously obvious to them obviously - obviously.

Seriously, looking forward to seeing the end result.

How does it compare with the infinite impossibility drive? This too allows travel instantaneously to any part of the galaxy - No plane needed, only a cup of strong tea...

Although I've never met Slartibartfast he must be highly intelligent and a very wise person:score 010:.He owns a Morgan Sierra.

Alan.

So why not just register "19". Can still have a MTOW of 600KG????This is yet "another" registration prefix for RAAus as if we havn't got enough now.

LSA"Leads to Sh!tty Administration"

or perhaps

 

"Lapse of Serious Administration"

 

or even

 

"Legislated but Seriously Abstruce" ( http://thesaurus.com/browse/abstruse you learn something new every day!)

"Lives Seriously Altered"

"Less $ AUD"

"Low Safety Awareness"

"Leaves Sour Aftertaste"

In legal jargon "shall" or past tense "should" is a legal imperative. It is equal to common usage of "must".

I can't get over the possibility that CASA were not interested in some propriety manufacturers screen sizes, more an equivalent size to the current format (A5). If you're in the minimum screen size, your in, if not, you're out.

What happened to the A5 reqirement then, my ipad mini 2 that I am waiting for, won't cut it then.

http://www.papersizes.org/a-paper-sizes.htm

And no, your iPad Mini will not cut it as your PRIMARY source of data, but OK as secondary, noting that the measurements were given as minimums. What they're saying is A5 minimum size not approximately (up to) A5.

The wordings a little grey on this, an AOC needs a mandatory backup copy, however all pilots need ready access in event of failure, and smart phones are specified as not being an appropriate primary or secondary, so it seems unlikely that you cant use an iPhone as a back up even if you're an private or RA pilot?

The way I read it is the PRIMARY source of data must adhere to the minimum size to be legal (257mm/10.1"). A SECONDARY source on a smaller device is also acceptable in the event of the failure of the PRIMARY device and for use in calculations. There is no avenue for using a small device as the PRIMARY source of data.