-
Posts
71 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Store
Aircraft
Resources
Tutorials
Articles
Classifieds
Movies
Books
Community Map
Quizzes
Videos Directory
Posts posted by gibby
-
-
Maybe a little early in the morning for a willy willyCould be a willy willy. They are always around. You don't see them unless dust or cut grass, leaves indicate their presence. Nev -
Yes there is a fence and then probably 300 to 400 meters there are power lines, beyond the runway the terrain has a slight incline. Words from the passenger is that the engine was still at full power when they came to rest and no mention of failure
-
1
-
-
Runway 27, grass 530m, there was about 120m of runway leftGreat that there are no injuries.An Esqual... engine unknown, but Esquals were distributed by a Bert Flood company, so possibly a Rotax. However, they also accepted Jab. engines.The strip at Wangaratta is 1640 metres, from ERSA. The Esqual publicity says t/o to 15 metres obstacle, 138 metres: less than half that of a Foxbat A22! ( I personally believe that is utter BS, but then I am a cynic). BUT: if it is correct, then there would have been well more than 1K of strip on which to put down. The landing distance in the Esqual PR blurb - from over a 15 metres obstacle - is 200 metres (also less than a Foxbat).
SO: why does an engine failure at 3 metres off the deck, with maybe 5 times the potential required landing distance directly in front of it, result in a major crash landing ending in a ball of flame?
The mop-up of this, with the health hazards of combusted carbon fibre, will not be cheap.
-
There was talk of a fuel problem earlier (unconfirmed report) but if that was the case why would you take up a passenger of a short ruwayABC interview with the pax ...he said they lifted off and the wing dropped and they crashed...no mention of any engine failure...most likely hauled it off the ground 2 up-
1
-
-
Runway 27, grass 530m, aircraft was about 130m from end of runway, passenger was a big guy, over 100kg, I did not see the accident but did see the result. Rotax powered and yep nothing to salvage (maybe a strobe light)Great that there are no injuries.An Esqual... engine unknown, but Esquals were distributed by a Bert Flood company, so possibly a Rotax. However, they also accepted Jab. engines.The strip at Wangaratta is 1640 metres, from ERSA. The Esqual publicity says t/o to 15 metres obstacle, 138 metres: less than half that of a Foxbat A22! ( I personally believe that is utter BS, but then I am a cynic). BUT: if it is correct, then there would have been well more than 1K of strip on which to put down. The landing distance in the Esqual PR blurb - from over a 15 metres obstacle - is 200 metres (also less than a Foxbat).
SO: why does an engine failure at 3 metres off the deck, with maybe 5 times the potential required landing distance directly in front of it, result in a major crash landing ending in a ball of flame?
The mop-up of this, with the health hazards of combusted carbon fibre, will not be cheap.
-
1
-
-
-
Channel 9 news states that the aircraft has been found of cape Byron, pilot is still missing.
-
This is a great video of why you don't try to turn back after engine failure
-
6
-
2
-
9
-
3
-
-
Also heard on the news earlier that the same plane had suffered engine failure 15 years ago and had landed on a road with a much better result
-
The Comanche 400 took its fair share of doctors scalps in the USA as well
-
Its quite funny reading the should of could offs about incidents on this forum but every situation is different, there are so many variables that can change the outcome and unless you are in that situation its pretty hard to judge pilots decisions and actions, aircraft type makes a big difference some glide very well, some glide like bricks, some are over the fence at 40 knots some at 90 knots, wind direction and strength maybe gusts or turbulence. I am sure anyone that has been in this situation would love to have another go and rectify all the mistakes they made. If you can survive engine failure unhurt but destroy your aircraft that is a good outcome, you can not by your health!!
-
1
-
2
-
-
a few banged up aircraft and some lucky people
-
possible control issues, elevator maybe, atsb will be on site to determine the cause, I don't think he was trying to stretch his glide
-
1
-
-
[MEDIA=reddit]melbourne/comments/3rqm8a[/MEDIA]
-
airfactsjournal.com/2015/02/fatal-cirrus-crashes-way-thank-parachute
Interesting read, the stats on surviving a crash if you pull the chute are way better than if you dont
-
1
-
-
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-16/ultralight-pilot-survives-crash-at-yarrawonga/6115218
http://www.bordermail.com.au/story/2885264/crash-landing-at-yarrawonga/?cs=11
Not sure of type. they have just re opened runway 05/23 due to non compliance so will be interesting if it was on 05.
-
Nine news reported that the pax was an experienced pilot with over 50 years under his belt. news stated he used to fly outback and preach the bible. Not very Christian like to try to bring a plane down!
-
It was engine failure straight from the horses mouth. 9 news interviewed the pilot.
-
9 news interviewed the pilot and he said it was engine failure. He was 72 and had been flying for 40 years. Good job to get it down and dodge the golfers on the fairway
-
1
-
-
today show this morning shows a jabiru down south of Brisbane, both pilot and pax walked away
light plane crash in Wangaratta, northeastern Victoria, this morning.
in Aircraft Incidents and Accidents
Posted