Jump to content

sseeker

Members
  • Posts

    612
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by sseeker

  1. Hi Pete, See the attached document RE push for sport PPL. -Andrew PPL_exemption.pdf PPL_exemption.pdf PPL_exemption.pdf
  2. Congratulations Jake! Glad you enjoyed your first formal lesson, one of many enjoyable ones to come. Remember to stick by it no matter what, you're gonna hit bumps in training where you'll feel like you're going no where (like me and navs!) just keep going and you'll get there. The weather's bad when you want it to be good, but just be patient and it'll work out how you want it to! -Andrew
  3. In this question, you can't arrive at the CASA required answer... My question has been answered by Ignition and Sue, thanks to both of them. Thank you to everyone who contributed :thumb_up: -Andrew
  4. Thanks for following up Sue. Like I said earlier in the topic, I don't really have a problem with it as I did get the question right. I just think it gives nameless school students an advantage over an outside student from say RAA, GFA or any other GA school coming in and sitting the exam. That one mark could make the difference between passing and failing. -Andrew
  5. Yes Sue that's correct. The question wanted the schools policy answer which was c. After every refuel and before every flight. When in fact the legally correct answer is, after every refuelling and before the first flight of every day (which isn't in any of the options given). I thought the BAK was supposed to be CASA generated, but this schools had its name all over it. -Andrew
  6. Sue, I quoted that piece of law in my original post. I'm trying to say that there's no option there to answer the question "legally correct" basically the question is referring to the schools policy, which should not be allowed in a BAK exam? -Andrew
  7. Hi Sue, Thanks for your reply. I would expect a policy related quesiton like this to be in a pre-solo/pre-area solo exam that the school writes. I thought BAK exams had to come from CASA and they tested you on CASA law/rules? Also the to students note was something that I wrote (from CASA regs) just so students viewing this thread don't get confused. -Andrew
  8. Ignition you're missing the point. I'm asking are they allowed to put school related policy questions in a BAK exam that is nationally recognised?. So tell me, when should a fuel drain be conducted? I don't think that question would be asked in a BAK exam with those answers I've provided you with, as they're all incorrect for that question. -Andrew
  9. Ignition, none of those options are legally correct. After refuelling and before every flight isn't a legal requirement, the legal requirement is outlined in my post. -Andrew
  10. Didn't want to name the school purely because a future student could come along (prior to sitting their BAK) and get a +1 on there exam nice and easy ;) The question I'm asking is, are they allowed to put school related policy questions on a nationally (possibly ICAO??) recognised exam? -Andrew
  11. Hi all, More of a GA orientated question. I sat my GA BAK exam on Friday which I passed. One of the questions was, "If you're flying in a nameless owned C152, when must you drain the fuel?" a. Before every flight b. After every refuel c. After every refuel and before every flight d. First thing in the morning only (not sure if this was an actual option although it was just an obviously wrong option) I answered c which was correct although I didn't think they were allowed to add school only related questions in a generic BAK exam? What if someone only came to this nameless club to sit the BAK exam? For example an RAA student wishing to sit the GA BAK exam because they later wished to continue in GA training. They would have no idea about the school's policies so they'd get that question wrong. Can they do that? TO STUDENTS: The legal requirement is to drain fuel after every refuel and before the first flight of the day. -Andrew
  12. Hi Evan, Congratulations! It's a fantastic privilege to be able to share you passion of aviation with others. Just remember, fly safe. -Andrew
  13. Same with me Tomo. I've just got back from Jandakot with my ATC Aerodynamics Book and I'm surprised, I was expecting it to be a fairly thick book but it's fairly thin... Heaps of text but. Going over it briefly, it looks like most of the stuff I've already learned from school, I don't think the aerodynamics exam is gonna be too hard for me to get an excellent result in. -Andrew
  14. Fantastic photos, really enjoyed looking through them. Must go up that way myself, views around Exmouth/Ningaloo are fantastic -Andrew Also, you wouldn't happen to know if one of the registrations on those corporate jets was VH-ACE?
  15. David, you're 100% correct. We're all very fortunate to have members such as those listed above and others! Thank you to those who put a consistent effort into giving us the most accurate information :thumb_up: You are permitted to self study for all exams. No theory lessons are required. -Andrew
  16. Why do I need Bob when I have you guys? :big_grin: -Andrew
  17. Hi Ryan, Thanks for the recommendation, you're totally right about not limiting myself to one book. Thanks, Andrew
  18. Question for all you CPL holders. What are the best CPL theory study books? I'm not talking best book to make you pass the exam, but I mean most explanation and detail etc... I've previously read Bob Tait books for BAK and I found he uses quite complex ways of explaining things and teaches in a rather 'old fashion' manner. I've found Aviation Theory Centre to be quite good in explaining stall spin theory (which is apparently quite a complex concept to master properly) What are your recommendations? -Andrew
  19. I've attached a letter from CASA to the AUF (old RA-Aus) that states that hours will count towards a 200hr syllabus. Note: Command only. -Andrew CivilAviationRegulation5115.pdf CivilAviationRegulation5115.pdf CivilAviationRegulation5115.pdf
  20. Hi Winsor, Yes that's located in Albany, WA. That's what got me interested in them. I thought they looked a bit tricky to fly! -Andrew
  21. Hi Riley, Thanks for the reply. I've only ever read good things about the Scout, how it was one of the best commercially built 'original' rag and tube ultralights. Although they always looked a bit 'tacky'. Wouldn't mind having a bit of a looksie at the on hangared nearby. Merely an interest. Looking for something rag and tube (Thruster T83/T85 like) -Andrew
  22. Can't seem to find anything on eBay. Is this the Australian or American eBay? -Andrew
  23. Interesting, was it effective? It's big wings would probably make it effective. How many do you think are still around? I've seen two of them down south in WA. -Andrew
  24. Got a few questions regarding the Skycraft Scout (any make). Firstly, how on Earth do they turn? I can't see any ailerons, does the whole wing move? -Andrew
  25. That was excellent! Really enjoyed reading that. She has talent for sure!! -Andrew
×
×
  • Create New...