-
Posts
846 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Store
Aircraft
Resources
Tutorials
Articles
Classifieds
Movies
Books
Community Map
Quizzes
Posts posted by AVOCET
-
-
Apart from crank balance , i found that a poor fuel distribution can feel like something's out of balance . Changing to multipoint fuel injection made a huge improvement in smooth running ,
Also balancing the prop on the engine ( dynamic balance) also takes pistons , rods , and every thing else that moves into account,
Pulling down a new engine and only doing the crank only does half the job ,
Cheers .
-
What's the history with the engine?
-
If you are talking rigger's angle of incidence ( which I assume you are) changing it will mainly affect the fuselage attitude in flight. The wing works the same.For a wing to lift at low speed , it needs lift devices like slats/slots for the Leading edge and efective trailing edge flaps,( slotted or fowler) or have "blown" wings. Other wise it will have a lot of area and a thick wing section, all of which mitigate against fast cuising. Nev
That's right , if you change the angle of incidence ( what your calling pitch ) will only change the position of the fuse in flight ,
The wing will always want to fly at about 3 deg . To the air flow .
In the situation you suggest ,as the aircraft left the ground (as you say 10deg pitch) it would pitch the the fuse down and Probly scare the "be -Jesus " out of you as the wing settles back down to 3deg ish
Cheers Mike
-
I'm grab'n my 7th. April 2013 rego sticker and making the 3 into an 8 , stuff em , now it's registered to 2018 ,then 2 months later at YBUD ....
-
Said I'm still waiting on my rego and I'm about to .........
-
Have you got you rego yet?
-
Coke can is .010 thou on the knocker , I've used it for shimming jobs , handy stuff ,I think that thickness is only slightly thicker than the thickness of a Coke can. That should be pretty light.I've also just sloshed fibre glass tanks with a product called "BILL HERSCH"
" gas tank sealer" , it's tested with ethanol , & alcohol at 80% for two years , a place in Sydney sells it , don't know about 2 stroke though.
I got 4quarts on e bay for $ 123.90
Google " fuel tank sealer , for the specs
Cheers Mike
-
I've found on the jaby type U/C that grass or rough ish dirt strips really vibrates the U/C ,on the avocet you get a good view of the wheel & leg and i was suprised how violent it moves back & forth ,even on the taxi , it looks like the bolts are loose . I would think this has a fatigue effect on the bolts , as I have replaced several over the years with slight bends .
It used to be the back bolt on the old Jabys
Doesn't seem to be as much of an issue if they are only used on the Tarmac .
Cheers Mike
-
SDS is a grate multi piont FUELINJECTION system and Ross is a great guy to deal with . The difference it's makes to smooth running is to second to none , coupled with liquid cooling , seems to be the way to go ,
- 1
-
Bex better, one tablet add water and fuel ,then fly ,,, I feel better already
- 1
-
Yes did miss the smile , I wasn't trying to be sarcastic , just keeping it real .ive had 1500 hrs on jaby engines since 1996 ( and no real issues ) although I'm Probly a bit bias , I built the first patterns for the original jaby engine ,( gee that brings back memories )Did you miss the laffing face by chance? It was a joke.But fair question anyway - I am slowly gathering components and intend for 25 engines to be both bench tested to death and appointed to various flyers for testing in various configurations.I won't get into Jab engines other than to say I am looking heavily at cylinder head solutions for them.
Anyway,
I think what your doing is absolutely great ,
And if your looking for any help , testing , flying , installations , ect . I'm interested in engine options for further development for the Avocet & I think it's important to support Australian endevour ,( just got a set of EQ headsets , go Aussie go )
My be we could talk ?
Cheers mike
- 1
- 1
-
Good luck &cheersFor how long?So what your saying is that this new engines going to work and stay working straight out of the box , I wonder if you'll have to eat your words (for how long?)in a couple of years or so , -
Who what ware when ????
-
If the nose wheel is faired then it would have a more significant effect. It certainly is large enough to cause a deflection in any case. Try holding something of comparable size with 10 degrees deflection out the car window at 100 kph ( or don't, but you see what I mean).
I agree , I've had the same issue when test flying new aircraft , it doesn't take much mis alignment of the nose wheel to rudder to upset the balance , it's even more pronounced with a front spat .
What I've done is get the plane to taxi straight with the rudder peddles in the neutral position & then offset the rudder 5 mm to the left or right ( depending on tractor / pusher ect.) flight test , and adjust accordingly ( you have to think it through which way to ajust )until the balls in the middle . This assumes that the wing & flap incidence are correct
Cheers Mike
-
He's right , keep it up , aviation needs thinkers as well as doers , it's a good Idea and would not be that hard to work out the stresses & loads for a given prop size / boom size ,& such .(I know the "such"is the tricky bit)I doubt that man will ever be able to imitate that.As for keeping it up................................lol. Oh, you're referring to 'the good work" Sorry.I need an experienced design engineer to do the cradle. My attempts to incorporate thrust bearing(fore and aft) are somewhat childish and probably non workable.
The thrust bearing for a crank shaft isnt that difficult to reproduce on your boom , chech out the jabiru manual ,( that'll Probly keep you up tonight , sorry,... not) .whatever you do you'll have to incorporate some form of lubrication IDE imagine ?
My Son has designed a planetary gearbox for contra rotating props that mounts on a boom . He has a working virtual modle that has impressed his mech engineer uncle ( believe me that sayin something !)we are going to get (build ) a 3 D printer to make the prototype
So as soon as the Avocets up & sorted ill be starting on the light weight motor glider.
I need something cheep to run &
fly / glide around the Flinders on those glorious days .ide really like to go electric , or solar
Cheers
-
Yes, I saw this up in bundy , theres no danger to pilot /pass.the avocets got a different wing position , it would make pilot & pas. And engines in front of the leading edge , even so the twin jabs need a fair bit of tail ballast I would think .How about this configuration? -
I guess they are , but most twins are a lot bigger than the avocet , so they would seem a lot closer , I've set it out & you carnt even get out of the door without passing through the prop arch .I was thinking the tractor arrangement would work well for c/g. The prop arc of many twins seems close to the cabin.I've had a look at the c/g and it will work as a pusher , better assametrics as well .
Pushers work well ,especially with liquid cooling,
-
That's on my short list , needs a lighter fuse ,But the wings are too short for a glider.One waiting for the batteries to get cheeper & lighter , & more reliable ,
-
The Avocet looks to be the ideal platform for a twin - wing mounted engines. It would be a very pretty aircraft and would really perform.
Yes I agree , it's possible to modify the 250 wing to mount engine pods , however as a tractor the prop arch's a bit close to the cockpit , same with the turret mounted tractor ( this my original design , but the prop arch was right over the top of you head ,not a good sales piont !)
So as a twin IDE go for a pusher setup ,
Could be 2x rotax , or D motors , or 2x 2200 liquid cooled ,
It's a great idea , just need some one to put up the $$ (maybe a few more ) and we are off , any time your ready ,
Cheers ,mike
-
Hi Phil , good to hear from you , I've got an insurance job at the moment so ill have a bit of materhorn white jabiru .
I painted the avocet with materhorn white Cessna , it slightly creamier , and not as glairy as the jab paint , come over for a cuppa and I can do some touch ups for you .
The 250 wing can lift a lot more weight than the 230 wing and has a lower stall speed 38 kt
They are prity much the same price
Cheers Mike
-
Avocet , an aboriginal name for a bird that crashes into trees when landing .
My wife an I carnt stop laughing
That's funny ,:roflmao:we'll done .
Why carnt come out with stuff like that ?
-
Yes , there are 25 moulds for the fusalerge & vertical stab , I've used the jabiru 250 wings and undercarriage , wing struts are theirs but 30 mm longer , also had to have control cables made to length ,
Cabin width is 50" & with the rounded fusalerge & has plenty of elbow room , 8 inches between pilot & passenger ,
Duel control columns ,throttle in the center .
Fuel injected , liquid cooled ,dynon skyview,
Cruise 105 kt at 2950 rpm ,22 lt/hr stall 42kt MTOW empty weight 375kg .
62" wood prop ( Brent Thompson , only one I could get to make a pusher , does a great job)
The take off & landing are pretty much the same as a j230
- 1
-
Sorry about the bad photos , ill take some more tomorrow with the prop on & the cowels,
What looks like a spinner is a 30 amp alt that bolts onto the vac pump attach spline on the 3300 . Not the belt version , this leaves the jabiru alt intact for a backup .
Yes it's got a new turret , got some help from an aeronautical engineer to design the basic structure , but it's just like a wing on its edge with a spar , a lot better looking than my first attemp
Cheers mike
- 1
-
I googeled " boom prop " and there's a guy in America who's made a similar assembly and used a 3D printer to make it . It's with a look .i don't know how to set up a link so you'll have to google it
Cheers & thanks
Mike .
Aviation related tattoos...
in AUS/NZ General Discussion
Posted
The way things at going you'll need a tatto endorsement befor you can fly with it ( I spose you could always keep your sleeves rolled down )