Jump to content

Aldo

Members
  • Posts

    509
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Aldo

  1. Long story short

     

    I had noticed a similar drop in RPM with my 3300 at similar hours (but I have a good idea why it was caused now), with all the same indications that you have stated, good plug & exhaust colour, engine running smoothly, the only thing I did notice on a couple of occasions in the few hours previous was the odd miss at altitude in cruise (had put it down to a bit of carby ice at the time) and a slight increase in oil consumption (in fact it was in the catch bottle), leak down test showed 3 cylinders not particularly good (the worst No.1 was 30/80). Pulled the worst one found the rings glued to the piston, the other two were the same (1, 2 & 4). Completed a top overhaul and all was good.

     

    Leak down test will take you about 30 minutes, another thing to check is your exhaust make sure the muffler is not blocked up with soot or hornets nests.

     

    Anyone want the full story let me know

     

    Aldo

     

     

  2. Ben

     

    I use aviation security ID (www.securityid.com.au ) guy to talk to is Les Walters, I live in Queensland and they are in WA I got my last one in 4 days, also less expensive than CASA. The first one I got I cancelled the application with CASA and received the one from these guys in 7 days.

     

    Les Walters

     

    Director

     

    M 0428 4848 01

     

    Airport Security Pty Ltd / Security ID

     

    ABN 87 100 017 212

     

    In Australia Tel. 1300 00 2742 for ID Cards

     

    International +61 428 4848 01

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Helpful 2
    • Informative 2
  3. CAR262AP (5)

     

    (5) CASA or an authorised person may authorise a particular aircraft to be operated over the built-up area of a city or town subject to the conditions and limitations CASA or the authorised person considers necessary for the safety of other airspace users and persons on the ground or water.

     

    I applied for and received an exemption for flights over built up areas and received the certificate of exemption (granted this was 2009) but as I read 262AP (5) approval is still able to be granted.

     

    Also there was an article in a sport pilot mag a while back that listed all the limitations, as far as I could determine if you held a class 2 medical (minimum) a full PPL (inc CTA) and carried the required equipment you could request a clearance into CTA (doesn't mean you will get it though). I don't have the mag any longer to double check.

     

    Aldo

     

     

    • Agree 1
  4. There's a lot less traffic out there now, than there was 20 years ago

    Dafydd

     

    You're not flying where I am then, the traffic here has increased by a factor of 20 (at least) over the past 12 months and most of it is in the 3 miles a minute plus range.

     

    Aldo

     

     

  5. Mark

     

    Appreciate the insight into what happened and I also understand when you say it shouldn't have any adverse effect on you, you guys did all you could. Thanks for the update, and I'm not going to speculate what may have been the cause, I have spent a bit of time in 206's and they are as good as any for getting max loads off the ground safely.

     

    Please pass on my condolences to all involved.

     

    Aldo

     

     

  6. My take has always been I like to fly to wherever I want to fly to (within reason depending on what aircraft I'm in) if I need an ASIC then I will have one because I like to fly (it's only 200 bucks most people spend that much on a night out at a restaurant with their wife).

     

    That said I also believe it serves no purpose to those of us that fly, it is in place to satisfy the concerns of the general public that aviation is as safe from the nasty terrorists as it can be and all the security goons are there protecting them (couldn't be further from reality but we are not dealing with reality only emotion).

     

    What they (general public) don't realise is that it doesn't stop some person going and buying an aircraft, learning to fly it (no ASIC required) packing it full of whatever flying OCTA to Redcliff and then the 4 minute jaunt to Brisbane and parking it through the front windows at 6 in the morning when any number of WB are unloading/loading with probably upwards of 5000 people in the vicinity. Nothing and nobody to stop them. I'll probably have the feds come knocking on my door now and never be issued with another ASIC again.

     

     

    • Caution 1
  7. Seems like I'm not the only one who thinks the current system isn't good enough

    Nick

     

    I applaud your enthusiasm but it's not the system, it's the inept application of the system by the users, the licence or certificate you hold is not relevant either (I've seen plenty of RAA guys that perform way better than GA/commercial guys and obviously vice versa).

     

    My advice (for what it's worth and you certainly don't need to take any notice of me, I've only been flying for 27 years and I still learn something from every flight) is learn to fly with the equipment you have, with clock, compass, radio, up to date maps, wiz wheel and correct navigation procedures you should be able to give a pretty accurate position report at any time (+- 1NM) if you can't you haven't done enough training.

     

    you have a device that can transmit your location to within 50m or so horizontally and 250m or so vertically.

    You may want to check up on the separation requirements!

     

    Forget the technology and fly the aeroplane (yes I do use GPS & I pad as this reduces the workload but I can throw both of them out the window and still know where I am within a small margin of error), VFR means visual navigation and we all need to be proficient, if we're not this is when the system fails.

     

    Aldo

     

     

    • Like 2
  8. Geez Aldo, two miles apart,,,,you should come for a fly in the Yarra valley ,on a bright sunny day the aeroplanes are like flies at times, if I'm tracking south from Coldstream behind the dandenongs I always go low, the flying schools seem to arrive in the arvo at about the same time ,same hemispherical ,same area, all on descent ,and mostly intelligible ( Chinese or Hindi accents are real hard on the radio),,,,,,,mmmmm two miles would be nice insane.gif.b56be3c4390e84bce5e5e6bf4f69a458.gifMatty

    Matty

    Missed the point entirely, 2 miles with 5 miles a minute closing speed is 12 seconds!

     

     

  9. The threat of a mid air collision is probably the only thing that really scares me about flying for the simple reason that to some extent it's beyond my control. I've only been doing this for 6 months or so and have already had a couple of head shaking moments and have heard a few stories that are down right scary.I've been watching the post on which frequency to transmit on and the fact that there is any confusion at all is scary. I can't help but wonder why, in this day and age, we are relying on radios and all of their inherent problems to keep us apart. Of course I think proper use of the radio is imperative to preventing accidents, but surely there could be a backup solution beyond looking out the window.

     

    So it got me thinking, what are the other options for RA aircraft? All of the commercial solutions can instantly be ruled out due to the cost element alone. Sure you can set up an ADS-B receiver easy enough, but it's not the planes with ADS-B out that I'm really worried about.

     

    Does anyone know of any other solution? One thing I can't work out is why Ozrunways or AvPlan can't integrate it into their apps. Every smart phone and most tablets have a data connection and GPS chip. Of course the data won't work in remote areas, but in most of the busy areas, you would get a signal. So why can't Ozrunways /Avplan aggregate and map location data from all active users? I'm guessing that if they did that and were prepared to combine data streams, it would be pretty useful. Especially if they were to release an iPhone/Android version of their app that could be put into 'traffic' mode. That way most people woudn't even need to buy any new equipment...you could have a lightweight, relatively effective little TCAS display by mounting your phone above the panel..it's far from a perfect solution, but then again, neither is the radio.

     

    Nick

    Nick

    With the short time you have been flying I'm not surprised that you find it difficult, spatial awareness and orientation is something that takes a lot of practice especially when you have to decipher it from a radio call (and nine times out of ten the clown on the other end mumbles so fast that you have no idea what has been said anyway).

     

    The best way that I find is to have a radio that you can monitor more than 1 frequency on, depending on where you are flying and the distances between CTAF's I will always monitor the CTAF from at least 30 miles out and have the area frequency on the primary channel. This allows me to build up a picture in my head of all the traffic in the vicinity and their expected times of arrival at the destination. If available I will always have the Transponder on 1200 so radar is able to see me if inside their range. I also write down the call signs of any aircraft that is likely to be within 5 minutes of my ETA. If the other aircraft are IFR and their track or arrival time is close to mine I will call centre and advise them of my position/track and ETA for the destination, they will generally pass this information on to the IFR aircraft, if not the other aircraft should hear your position and intention report on the area frequency anyway.

     

    The radio your eyes and your ability to visualise the other traffic from the information you hear is your best defence in avoiding a midair.

     

    That said I have recently had three near misses.

     

    1. Afternoon departure out of Toowoomba FD478 flying doctor inbound from the west heard his inbound call on CTAF spoke with him and advised that my track would take me 6 miles south of Oakey, asked him if he was tracking inbound overhead Oakey to which he responded yes, we passed within 1000 feet horizontally of each other (same altitude) 6 miles south of Oakey (scared the crap out of me)

     

    2. Inbound to Roma MJA (chieftan) call at 20 miles 8000 feet on 095 bearing estimating within 2 min of me (I was behind and on 107 bearing) and at 8500 feet, thought ok I'm 2 miles a minute he is 3 miles a minute I'm closer than him but we shouldn't cross paths as we were both tracking for crosswind for 36. Next call from MJA was at 15 miles and I was at 8 miles (something wasn't adding up) how could I have got a minute in front of him and his estimate was still 2 min before me, I called him to confirm he was at 15 miles and he responded yes, I tracked a little further to the south to give myself some room, when I finally saw him we were less than 1000 feet apart same altitude, I called and asked if he had me visual to which he answered no I told him I was at his 9 o'clock, the response was an immediate right turn, I landed No. 2 to him with no further issues.

     

    3. Inbound to Miles from the south east, flying doctor (king air) inbound from the west estimating within 2 min of each other, called him and asked his intentions, he said he was tracking to join xwind for 04 (immediate alarm bells) why was a king air tracking from the west with the active runway being 04 tracking to join xwind I eventually saw him ( he never saw me) and we were about 2 miles apart.

     

    Lessons: keep your eyes outside and work hard on your spatial visualisation skills. Don't trust anyone to be where they say they are going to be, maintain your lookout.

     

    Aldo

     

     

  10. Think yourselves lucky, I like M61A1 run my house on tank water and would only consider drinking any town water anywhere as a last resort.

     

    Last year my water bill was in excess of $1000 and we don't have a potable town water supply. That's what you get from Western Downs Regional Council

     

     

  11. Aldo, you must have missed the change in the weather? hasn't rained here for months

    FT

    Its not the rain it's the crap that comes in over the range at 500' or lower, 3 mornings last week, 2 so far this week almost impossible to get in.

     

    YTWB would be perfect except for the fog that can roll in any time any day.

     

     

  12. The Toowoomba airport would be ideal for the RAA close to Brisbane and the excitement and glamour of the Gold Coast, large enough to dash8s. What more do you want?

    To be able to fly more than three (3) days a month, why would you want to subject any flying organisation to that s..t hole with the weather it has?

     

    I'm qualified to comment as I try to fly there 4 out of 5 days a week.

     

     

  13. The best method is the one that you are most comfortable with to be able to complete a satisfactory landing.

     

    Couple of things to remember though

     

    • If the forecast wind at you destination is greater than the published max x-wind for your aircraft then you must plan an alternate where the wind strength is less or there is a runway more into wind to reduce the x-wind component.
       
       
    • The landing is not complete until the aircraft is parked and tied down - many pilots have come to grief following touchdown and go phew glad that's over, only to find that the problems have only just started.
       
       
    • The more precise your circuit and approach the better the result - if your not happy the earlier you decide to shoot a missed approach the better, go round and get it better set up next time, providing you have enough fuel you can do this as long as you like, there should be no pressure on private (or commercial for that matter) pilots to get it down on this approach - forget about what other people think and concentrate on what you are doing.
       
       
    • Don't overthink the situation, there is only one (1) thing that you have to do with a x-wind landing in a light aircraft and that is to control the drift - i.e. the wheels should be pointing straight down the runway at touchdown, all the rest is the same
       
       
    • If all else fails and you don't have the fuel required to go somewhere else or keep trying, find a road that is into wind do a couple of good precautionary runs to check for obstacles (power lines, vehicles, trees and the like) and put it down there - you will no doubt get your butt kicked by CASA and others but I would rather be alive and asking for forgivness than be dead and have my actions or lack of discussed on a forum such as this one.
       
       
    • Above all else practice, practice and more practice competency is all about currency.
       
       

     

     

    Personally I find it easier to lay off the drift (nose into wind) and fly a normal approach, as I approach the flare bring the nose to be aligned with the centre line with rudder and control the drift with aileron, once on the ground maintain full into wind aileron, get the flaps away (only if you have control) and start breaking to get the speed washed off.

     

    Aldo

     

     

    • Like 2
  14. I have the same problem with my 230 and I believe it is related to the fuel tank filler/cap installation.

     

    If I happen to overfill or park on an uneven surface and the fuel is able to gravity feed from one tank to the other I have found that the fuel actually leaks out through the wing root (I'm yet to find the reason for this) but I suspect it is to prevent over pressuring the fuel tank, if you look inside the fuel filler point you will notice a row of holes in the metal insert, I think this is where the fuel/fumes are able to pass into the void space in the wing. If this is the case then fumes will be able to transit through the control cable openings from the wing root to the interior of the fuselage.

     

    I'm not certain that this is the reason and I'm investigating further.

     

     

  15. Don

     

    This is the same issue faced by any business, I know I've been there and the sooner we bit the bullet and put on staff specific to the jobs required to be done the better the business operated. This was mainly due to the fact that myself and business partners (directors/board) were able to get on with managing the business growth and direction.

     

    As much as we didn't want to, we also put in levels of management to manage each department and allowed them to manage these departments (this initially increased our overhead for no increase in return) but has eventually allowed the business to grow and produce much better returns.

     

    You will find that if you put on the correct staff and allow them to have ownership in the business/organisation it will produce much better results all round.

     

    When the improvements are finished and working RA-Aus will need fewer staff not more. For a temporary increase in workload you need temporary staff.

    Be very careful with this approach as it is quite easy to end up back where you started, also temporary staff have no ownership in the operation and therefore you will not get the maximum result.

    Just my opinion for what its worth.

     

    Al

     

     

  16. Ladies/Gents

     

    A GM's job is to manage not to do, without sufficient underlings to manage a GM is useless (as he/she can't do it all him/her self).

     

    The only solution is to spend whatever money is required to be spent, and if that means it will cost members more per year then so be it, put on full time staff (as many as is required) to get the systems updated and the work completed only then will RA-AUS be able to move forward. If this isn't done RA-AUS will die a slow death as it has been doing for some time now or CASA will speed that process up eventually with one swift blow.

     

    Al

     

     

  17. If John's post is correct, "was going around again and on his left turn......", and that was the turn on to crosswind, then what Aldo said is fair and reasonable. If you read to the end you'll see that Aldo hoped John's report is incorrect.

    Thanks Turbo

     

    Nice to see some people understand where I was coming from.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...