Jump to content

2tonne

Members
  • Posts

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 2tonne

  1. Is that what we used to call sacking someone?Cheers, Willie.

    Hmm, no. With performance management there is not allowed to be any suggestion that someone will be sacked until you have been through weeks and weeks of pain. Then it gets more painful and miserable for everyone for a bit longer, and then they get sacked.
  2. Not "tongue-in-cheek" at all. I think you used the word "titillation" in a correct context - suggestion that someone could see sexual connotations in the picture. What I was pointing out that the connotations are in the mind of the beholder. Instead of mens sana in corpora sano, there's a lot of mens insana in corpora insano around workplaces.OME

    And I don't know how to remove the picture of the fuel tank.

    Nice fuel tank, you can send me a picture of that anytime
  3. OME, I was just trying to rationalise why someone would find it objectionable in the work place, and my use of "titillation" was a bit tongue-in-cheek.

     

    In the work place though it all comes down to how others may perceive it. My theory is that if there is any chance of offence, then keep it away from work. I recently had to performance manage someone out of our organisation, and the employee was angry and looking at every opportunity to bring me down. I had an "equal opportunity" complaint filed against me and a restraint sought through Fair Work Australia for bullying. Not much fun, but luckily there was no ammunition that could be used against me, so all claims failed. Now, this person had access to my work emails as part of their job, and if pics like this had turned up I guarantee they would have been used against me.

     

     

  4. My instructor told me that i would be going solo in the next couple of lessons, so I had plenty of warning. On the day itself I went up with my instructor for about 6 circuits, regular landing 1 stage flap, full flap and no flap landings. Then my instructor jumped out and I went up for three circuits with the CFI, again full flap, no flap and regular flap landings. I ballooned on the last one and thought I had blown it for the day. But, CFI got me to taxi to the bowser, we filled her up and he said off you go. Just one circuit. I remember that just at that time it started getting busy in the circuit. I had two aircraft waiting behind me, and I had to hold for a couple (including the yellow Antonov 2) before I got to go. As I was lining up I heard a call for late final that gave me a surprise, but turned out to be a helicopter landing so no conflict for me. Then it was off and yeehhaaa! One up in the J160 and it was like a rocket. That moment of looking at the empty right hand seat on downwind was such a buzz. Had a decent landing, followed by obligatory photo looking slightly stunned in front of the aircraft. Then went home and had a few celebratory drinks and bored everyone with the story over and over again.

     

     

    • Like 4
  5. After a couple of months of no flying, it was a great to head out from YRED this morning. A few circuits to warm up and then over to Caboolture for a few more circuits before returning to Redcliffe. Will start my nav training shortly and really looking forward to it.

     

    1554627029_YREDYCAB2.png.ea442d77ae6f460b1d82b0850d4e7e86.png

     

     

    • Like 6
  6. TP, don't forget that Super funds often provide a certain level of cover with no disclosure requirement. E.g my super fund provides a base Level of cover (e.g 500K) based on occupation and with minimal exclusions.

     

    However, apply to go above this level of cover and you have to go through a full disclosure process. Based on that disclosure, the underwriter then decides to insure you (or not) based on the risk. But if you disclose that you fly ultralights (and that is one of the questions on their form) and they accept the risk you are covered.

     

     

    • Agree 1
  7. There is a great book about the spitfire vs me 109 called "the decisive dual". It also describes the FW 190, and if I recall correctly, described it as being superior to both the Spitfire and 109, but that is suffered from some engine issues and wasn't effective at high altitudes.

     

     

  8. Heard today at the airport from an ex board member who still lurks around on the fringes that the ATSB reports into Jabiru and Jabiru powered aircraft will be out within 2 weeks time. When i asked what it meant and what was in the report he wouldn't answer, just said its bad news for a lot of people.

     

    Now, don't shoot me down for reporting this, just keep a lookout for the report when released and go from there.

     

    Hopefully this will explain all the numbers and detailed events to satisfy both sides of the argument and REMOVE any bias and mystery from these reported numbers and events.

    I would be surprised if the ATSB would leak the results of a report before its official release.

     

     

  9. Dave, I think politicians often know the answer to the questions they are asking. They just want the other side to have to say it out loud. When in an adversarial situation, I always bear in mind the saying "never ask a question you don't already know the answer to".

     

     

    • Agree 7
  10. The point is not about the illnesses, it's about the process which is basically similar for all industriesNo one's going to get too upset about a does of gastro, but Salmonella can cost you an arm or leg, or even your life.

    Outbreaks of gastro infections caused by pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella and certain strains of E. coli are a BIG public health concern - remember Garibaldi? 23 kids got severely ill and one died. This bears no comparison whatsoever to the Jabiru issue.

    Edited

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...