Jump to content

onetrack

Members
  • Content Count

    1,131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

onetrack last won the day on February 7

onetrack had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,054 Excellent

About onetrack

  • Rank
    Well-Known Member

More Information

  • Gender
    male
  • Location
    Perth, W.A.
  • Country
    Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. onetrack

    Flying Club Sign

    But .. but .. if the wind blows the card away, you no longer have any method of measuring the weather!!
  2. If the folding rotor mast cheek plates are failing in service, it shows the regime and methods for the testing of the strength of the cheek plates, is deficient. More than one testing arrangement has proven to be inadequate to replicate the actual forces applied in normal use - and if the owners are carrying out manoeuvres that can be classed as being outside approved limits, then that's a whole new ball game. There's plenty of people out there operating things to past their design limits, just to, "see what it can do".
  3. onetrack

    Jabiru LSA vs 160

    Spare a thought for the poor buggers flying the Double Sunrise Qantas PBY Catalinas, Perth to Ceylon, during WW2. About 4 tons overweight on takeoff with monstrous additional fuel tanks fitted, they took off from Melville Water at Crawley, running 48 inches of MP and with the P&W R-1830's producing their intermittent maximum power of 1200HP each. They took up to 80 seconds to get clear of the Swan River, and with a climb rate that could be only be called "leisurely", they generally only just cleared the Fremantle railway/road bridges by around 100 feet, some 12 miles downstream. I have not seen any times quoted for the Catalinas to reach their 1500' initial Westbound cruise altitude, but I would not be surprised if it was around 20 minutes or more.
  4. onetrack

    Fuel Draining Jab 230c

    Bunnings Aerospace carry the answer to fuel stabilisation. https://www.bunnings.com.au/briggs-stratton-15ml-fuel-treatment-and-stabiliser_p3400450 Or if you're not fond of Bunnings, there's always Sta-bil. https://www.sta-bil.com.au/
  5. I think the news of the A380's demise wasn't exactly unexpected. If it wasn't for PetroDollars, AB would have been struggling to sell many at all. The costs of altering hangars and servicing equipment to handle them must have been immense. I always pondered what would happen if one of them crashed as a total loss, with all aboard wiped out. I bet it gave a lot of emergency agency bosses, sleepless nights. How do you deal with up to 800 bodies in one air disaster, and a vast amount of destruction on the ground? Hospitals would be overwhelmed, they struggle to cope with modest disasters, now. My thoughts were, that if one crashed, it would be the final nail in the A380's coffin. But, it appears my thoughts were too negative, and the rule that the bigger the aircraft, the safer it is, is correct.
  6. onetrack

    ME 262 Sturmvogel - Was Hitler correct?

    Hitlers decisions were flawed on every front, in every month of every year of WW2. He demoted or destroyed those who had the necessary skills to improve the Luftwaffe. He ordered that all components produced, be turned into operational aircraft, leaving no spares for support. The reasoning behind this, was Hitler wanted to demonstrate superior numbers in available equipment to the Allies. The end result of his faulty reasoning and orders was that, when the Luftwaffe aircraft started to break down, there were no spares to repair them - so the Lutfwaffe were forced to turn to cannibalisation of working aircraft to keep others going. Hitler spent vast amounts of time and money carrying out genocide on a race of people he detested. That act alone took up substantial manpower and money to carry out. He utilised half-starved POW's and some Jews to carry out labour tasks in his industries. As with the Japanese with the Bridge over the River Kwai, the Aussie POW's forced to work on the railway and bridge deliberately slowed up progress, and damaged equipment. The POW's and others forced to work in German operations would also have deliberately sabotaged and slowed up operations. It would have taken a lot more Germans to watch over the forced labour to ensure they didn't sabotage operations. Time after time, Hitlers understanding of tactics and strategies was proved to be woeful. Starting a War on one front against one implacable enemy, then starting a War on another front, in the exact opposite direction, isn't exactly the way to win wars. Hitler engineered the death of many of his most capable leaders in his ranks of senior officers, and replaced them with incompetents who were picked because they were toadies. On the Eastern Front, Hitler refused to take the advice of his most senior Generals, to fall back in a strategic retreat, when the Russians were threatening to overwhelm the Germans. Hitler told them they must not retreat, and they had to fight to the last man. They did exactly that, and it cost Germany hundreds of thousands of experienced fighting men, as well as losing vast amounts of German equipment to the Russians. No decision of Hitlers regarding aircraft ever had any vestige of success, simply because all his thought processes were flawed, he lacked full understanding of strategies and tactics, and he was driven simply by rage against Jews. As WW2 progressed, his decision-making became more and more flawed, and even some of his most senior officers went against his orders, numerous times. Any decision of Hitlers involving aircraft, would have been made for all the wrong reasons.
  7. No, I didn't want to kick him because of tall poppy syndrome, arrogance, or general cantankerousness. I thought about kicking him off his bike to stop him, and to give him a lesson that cones and traffic lollipops, to divert traffic, are there for a reason, the road rules that apply to everyone else, apply to him, too - and that he was effectively riding through an exclusive pedestrian area (same as a footpath) - and he could have easily mown down a kid, a dog, or a senior - and come a cropper himself, as well as injuring someone. I agree, there's plenty of smart-arses amongst the truck drivers and car drivers - but young motorcyclists seem to have turned it into a fine art, with total disobeyance of road rules at every turn. By far their greatest weakness is failing to understand, that screwing the throttle on full, on takeoff from the lights, and hitting 100kmh within 80-100M, will soon ensure a short lifespan. We've got a roadside memorial just up the road for a 19 yr old motorcyclist who did just that. The problem was, as he crested the rise in the 4 lane road at 100kmh (in a 60kmh zone), there was a bloke turning right into the shopping centre. The motorcyclist slammed into him, he went over the bonnet and landed head-first on the bitumen, and he was history. But everyone wailed about what a fantastic bloke he was. AFAIC, I don't have any sympathy for him, it's the Darwin selection process at work. But I do have sympathy for the parents and family left behind, that he had little regard for. The problem is, I guess, he had little regard for his own life, let alone anyone elses.
  8. It's because there's a fascination with flight, and the ultimate fear is crashing to the ground with sudden death, and often what appears a terrible death, the result. It's even more fascinating because the people who fly are generally "high-flyers" in society. The media love it and play on it. But, as regards motorcyclists, very few people care about motorcyclists being killed, because they're seen as "smart-arses" who like to ignore road rules, slipping between vehicles up the centre of lanes, always doing 20kmh over the limit, and always wanting to be out front. I was at a street market last night, the traffic control people block off the kerbside lane and just leave one lane for traffic, while the kerbside lane is blocked off for the pedestrians to mill about on. But one smart-arse motorcyclist decided he could ignore cones and rode his bike up the kerbside lane inside the cones, just so he could beat all the line of banked up cars. I felt like kicking him off his bike as he roared past. He's a cert to wipe himself out within a year or two - and the reason why motorcyclists are largely hated. Not to mention the Harleys with 130dB exhausts, who just have to blow your eardrums, because they need to show off.
  9. onetrack

    BalanceMaster testing

    The only problem that I can see is, acquiring washers with the correct OD and ID to ensure they're a snug fit. Any gaps would allow movement to start. I'd machine up some solid bushings to ensure the fit is precise, as regards OD and ID.
  10. Aww, c'mon Nev - you've seen those montrous swing-down, full-body harnesses, that the space travellers use in the movies. We've got ways of designing equipment, to stop pax from wriggling around in flight.
  11. I'm advising you I'm taking offence at the "short" notice wording. As a sensitive, vertically-challenged person, I take offence easily at anything being called "short", with my impressions being, that the "short" was actually aimed at me. My feelings are hurt, I'll have to talk to my lawyer. You should have used some other, non-discriminatory word, to avoid hurt feelings.
  12. I guess they could have a sliding seating mechanism which could adjust the C of G automatically, via sensors. With no need for the pax to be in a certain position to operate flight controls, they can be moved around to meet the C of G requirements.
  13. Well, the solution is simple - same as the airlines, someone will have to oversee the people boarding, and refuse boarding to those who do not comply with the regulations. The greater problem will be in regulating the flights as regards traffic control in the air. Maybe the authorities will have to reserve a complete new flight level for these things, say 200 to 400 feet.
  14. Cora seem extremely dedicated to making the "autonomous air taxi" a reality. IMO, they've still got a long way to go. Regulation and guidance are the fields that pose the most problems for them. It's interesting to see their aircraft design progression, from rather radical first designs, to essentially following some pretty basic light aircraft design. Their aircraft seems like a very viable and adequately reliable product. But I feel it will long be restricted to a "privileged group" of people, who will pay a lot more to go direct by air taxi, and who are happy to pay more, to avoid traffic congestion. https://cora.aero/blog/
  15. onetrack

    Are you happy?

    Facthunter - The answer to your problem of your computer "eating up" the letters ahead of where you're typing, lies in the "insert" button. Sometimes, one accidentally hits the "insert" button when editing, this inserts the letter you type, but deletes the next letter. Hit the "insert" button again, and this toggles off the feature.
×