fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Gday all Dont know if anyone has come up with this idea yet,but here it goes and it works pretty good. IO purchased these on Ebay for $100 AUD its very easy to instal and fits the Aerochute perfectly,no drilling only the brass nipple reducer you can get from Enzed or any hydraulics dealer see picture.The size for nipple is a 1/2 inch BSPT female thread reduced to a 3/8 BSPT male thread,see photo.You will need to carefully drill a 22mm drill into the female thread to the end of thread,then carefully put a 13.5 mm drill right through then drill and tap a 5mm thread on the side of hexagon nut for your locking grub screw.First smear some Threebond 1104 grey synthetic rubber liquid gasket which is great for petrol resistance,around the thread and inside the female drilled out end,you can get that liquid gasket on Ebay,save you running around.Lock it in place.Then take out the threaded plug on top of your tank,you will need to undo and swing out the Engine support bar to be able to slide in your 13mm 16 inch long capacity sender see picture, this is already perfect to go into your tank as it is 1 inch from your bottom tank to give a fuel reserve when on empty,nip up the nipple not over tight and thats it for your sender.The gauge I put on my console see picture is on a 52mm gauge holder from ebay .The needle does not move around everywhere while your flying as there is no moving float.You can also get these gauges and senders at Aircraft Spruce .com.but the sender is 24 inch long,but you can cut them to 16 inches,they are $80 AUD more plus shipping.I have been out flying twice and they work great.Have fun http://www.ebay.com/itm/261697663603?item=261697663603&viewitem=&vxp=mtr http://www.ebay.com/itm/261697663603?item=261697663603&viewitem=&vxp=mtr Sorry cant upload the other pictures,the support bar is the one which runs down the fuel tank which it also supports.If you come unstuck I am happy to send email some more photos.Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 Gday all Dont know if anyone has come up with this idea yet,but here it goes and it works pretty good. IO purchased these on Ebay for $100 AUD its very easy to instal and fits the Aerochute perfectly,no drilling only the brass nipple reducer you can get from Enzed or any hydraulics dealer see picture.The size for nipple is a 1/2 inch BSPT female thread reduced to a 3/8 BSPT male thread,see photo.You will need to carefully drill a 22mm drill into the female thread to the end of thread,then carefully put a 13.5 mm drill right through then drill and tap a 5mm thread on the side of hexagon nut for your locking grub screw.First smear some Threebond 1104 grey synthetic rubber liquid gasket which is great for petrol resistance,around the thread and inside the female drilled out end,you can get that liquid gasket on Ebay,save you running around.Lock it in place.Then take out the threaded plug on top of your tank,you will need to undo and swing out the Engine support bar to be able to slide in your 13mm 16 inch long capacity sender see picture, this is already perfect to go into your tank as it is 1 inch from your bottom tank to give a fuel reserve when on empty,nip up the nipple not over tight and thats it for your sender.The gauge I put on my console see picture is on a 52mm gauge holder from ebay .The needle does not move around everywhere while your flying as there is no moving float.You can also get these gauges and senders at Aircraft Spruce .com.but the sender is 24 inch long,but you can cut them to 16 inches,they are $80 AUD more plus shipping.I have been out flying twice and they work great.Have fun http://www.ebay.com/itm/261697663603?item=261697663603&viewitem=&vxp=mtr http://www.ebay.com/itm/261697663603?item=261697663603&viewitem=&vxp=mtr Sorry cant upload the other pictures,the support bar is the one which runs down the fuel tank which it also supports.If you come unstuck I am happy to send email some more photos.Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 More fuel gauge and sender photos for Aerochute If you have no Rectifier/Regulator on your machine for the 12v power source, then get a 12v7ah battery from ebay it fits nicely under your seat with velcro that is if you have a floor already on the machine ,then wire a 1 amp fuse and a online switch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 More fuel gauge and sender photos for Aerochute If you have no Rectifier/Regulator on your machine for the 12v power source, then get a 12v7ah battery from ebay it fits nicely under your seat with velcro that is if you have a floor already on the machine ,then wire a 1 amp fuse and a online switch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 I'll be the spoil sport and ask is this permitted on a factory built aircraft? 95.32 is very different from other CAOs as it does not require within itself the factory built aircraft (other than LSA and experimental LSA) to not be modified ... BUT - check with Aerochute on their manual for the aircraft - you are required to comply with the Ops manual under the RAA seperate from CAO 95.32 on mods ... and if it says no mods then this is not allowed and therefore flight is not permitted - check with the RAA Tech Manual ... On tech manual you may need an umpires decision (Tech Manager) on this one as current tech manual in modifications (section 3.5) is silent on 95.32 aircraft - RAA either forgot they had them under their remit or they accepted that 95.32 is silent on mods therefore despite being factory built they are free for all on mods ... but tech have tried doing odd things on 95.10 machines in the past without statutory authority and only came around after pointing out lack of authority ... But the new tech manual MAY have something coming that might bite and require you to either un-mod or get a sort of approval But at least its not MARAP as that is limited to aircraft operating under 95.55 which excludes 95.32 and 95.10 And yes folks - the above does appear to mean that there is a group of factory built two seaters that can be modified without reference to RAA tech or any engineer AND they can them be used for training and hire for reward ... anomaly? Yep Indeed if your manufacturers handbook does not require no mods it would seem that any weightshift of PPC can be modified to your hearts content and nobody can stop you. Now anyone got a spare IO360 and pusher prop, I've go an old Raven with a dead 447 ... =;-O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 I'll be the spoil sport and ask is this permitted on a factory built aircraft? 95.32 is very different from other CAOs as it does not require within itself the factory built aircraft (other than LSA and experimental LSA) to not be modified ... BUT - check with Aerochute on their manual for the aircraft - you are required to comply with the Ops manual under the RAA seperate from CAO 95.32 on mods ... and if it says no mods then this is not allowed and therefore flight is not permitted - check with the RAA Tech Manual ... On tech manual you may need an umpires decision (Tech Manager) on this one as current tech manual in modifications (section 3.5) is silent on 95.32 aircraft - RAA either forgot they had them under their remit or they accepted that 95.32 is silent on mods therefore despite being factory built they are free for all on mods ... but tech have tried doing odd things on 95.10 machines in the past without statutory authority and only came around after pointing out lack of authority ... But the new tech manual MAY have something coming that might bite and require you to either un-mod or get a sort of approval But at least its not MARAP as that is limited to aircraft operating under 95.55 which excludes 95.32 and 95.10 And yes folks - the above does appear to mean that there is a group of factory built two seaters that can be modified without reference to RAA tech or any engineer AND they can them be used for training and hire for reward ... anomaly? Yep Indeed if your manufacturers handbook does not require no mods it would seem that any weightshift of PPC can be modified to your hearts content and nobody can stop you. Now anyone got a spare IO360 and pusher prop, I've go an old Raven with a dead 447 ... =;-O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 I'll be the spoil sport and ask is this permitted on a factory built aircraft?95.32 is very different from other CAOs as it does not require within itself the factory built aircraft (other than LSA and experimental LSA) to not be modified ... BUT - check with Aerochute on their manual for the aircraft - you are required to comply with the Ops manual under the RAA seperate from CAO 95.32 on mods ... and if it says no mods then this is not allowed and therefore flight is not permitted - check with the RAA Tech Manual ... On tech manual you may need an umpires decision (Tech Manager) on this one as current tech manual in modifications (section 3.5) is silent on 95.32 aircraft - RAA either forgot they had them under their remit or they accepted that 95.32 is silent on mods therefore despite being factory built they are free for all on mods ... but tech have tried doing odd things on 95.10 machines in the past without statutory authority and only came around after pointing out lack of authority ... But the new tech manual MAY have something coming that might bite and require you to either un-mod or get a sort of approval But at least its not MARAP as that is limited to aircraft operating under 95.55 which excludes 95.32 and 95.10 And yes folks - the above does appear to mean that there is a group of factory built two seaters that can be modified without reference to RAA tech or any engineer AND they can them be used for training and hire for reward ... anomaly? Yep Indeed if your manufacturers handbook does not require no mods it would seem that any weightshift of PPC can be modified to your hearts content and nobody can stop you. Now anyone got a spare IO360 and pusher prop, I've go an old Raven with a dead 447 ... =;-O Yes it is allowed I have spoken to the manufacturer of Aerochute prior to installation, and he is ok with it as long as there is no drilling into the framework as there is not, as I mentioned in my post and not affecting c&g mtow,handling performance.Yes its true the Raa does not tell you too much on 95.32 mods what is allowed or not,one has to proceed with caution.If there are future rules implemented no problem,just unscrew the the sender and re screw the old plug back into its original position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 I'll be the spoil sport and ask is this permitted on a factory built aircraft?95.32 is very different from other CAOs as it does not require within itself the factory built aircraft (other than LSA and experimental LSA) to not be modified ... BUT - check with Aerochute on their manual for the aircraft - you are required to comply with the Ops manual under the RAA seperate from CAO 95.32 on mods ... and if it says no mods then this is not allowed and therefore flight is not permitted - check with the RAA Tech Manual ... On tech manual you may need an umpires decision (Tech Manager) on this one as current tech manual in modifications (section 3.5) is silent on 95.32 aircraft - RAA either forgot they had them under their remit or they accepted that 95.32 is silent on mods therefore despite being factory built they are free for all on mods ... but tech have tried doing odd things on 95.10 machines in the past without statutory authority and only came around after pointing out lack of authority ... But the new tech manual MAY have something coming that might bite and require you to either un-mod or get a sort of approval But at least its not MARAP as that is limited to aircraft operating under 95.55 which excludes 95.32 and 95.10 And yes folks - the above does appear to mean that there is a group of factory built two seaters that can be modified without reference to RAA tech or any engineer AND they can them be used for training and hire for reward ... anomaly? Yep Indeed if your manufacturers handbook does not require no mods it would seem that any weightshift of PPC can be modified to your hearts content and nobody can stop you. Now anyone got a spare IO360 and pusher prop, I've go an old Raven with a dead 447 ... =;-O Yes it is allowed I have spoken to the manufacturer of Aerochute prior to installation, and he is ok with it as long as there is no drilling into the framework as there is not, as I mentioned in my post and not affecting c&g mtow,handling performance.Yes its true the Raa does not tell you too much on 95.32 mods what is allowed or not,one has to proceed with caution.If there are future rules implemented no problem,just unscrew the the sender and re screw the old plug back into its original position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerochute Kev Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Hi Fred A good system by the look of it, at a reasonable price. The only problem for many is that the plug you used to install it, many of us already use that for the hook-up point for the reserve tank for longer trips. Not hard to drill and tap another hole though. Many of us have made mods to the Aerochute and have had no problem getting manufacture approval. I have never heard of the manufacturer refusing mods that did not make any modification to the structural framework. (Fuel sight tubes, Ali wheels, brakes, long range tanks, etc) In reality the Aerochute NEEDS the mods to make it safer and more comfortable for the pilot. Straight from the factory there is no way to have any idea of fuel use in flight, you just guess whats left based on the flight time. It is not even a factory optional extra. I can only assume this is for economic reasons. Many have used sight tubes on the side (I have) which do work well but a proper fuel gauge is better. I have however noticed that any request for mods by phone is no problem, but an email will most likely get no response. Not sure if that is a deliberate thing. Interested to hear if you got approval in writing? Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerochute Kev Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Hi Fred A good system by the look of it, at a reasonable price. The only problem for many is that the plug you used to install it, many of us already use that for the hook-up point for the reserve tank for longer trips. Not hard to drill and tap another hole though. Many of us have made mods to the Aerochute and have had no problem getting manufacture approval. I have never heard of the manufacturer refusing mods that did not make any modification to the structural framework. (Fuel sight tubes, Ali wheels, brakes, long range tanks, etc) In reality the Aerochute NEEDS the mods to make it safer and more comfortable for the pilot. Straight from the factory there is no way to have any idea of fuel use in flight, you just guess whats left based on the flight time. It is not even a factory optional extra. I can only assume this is for economic reasons. Many have used sight tubes on the side (I have) which do work well but a proper fuel gauge is better. I have however noticed that any request for mods by phone is no problem, but an email will most likely get no response. Not sure if that is a deliberate thing. Interested to hear if you got approval in writing? Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerochute Kev Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 I forgot to ask if your gauge is able to be self calibrated. The reason being the shape of the tank will mean a big error on the gauge as for example, half the fuel capacity is probably less that 1/3 up the tank. What sender did you use, there was no e-bay link to that, just 2 links to the gauge itself. Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerochute Kev Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 I forgot to ask if your gauge is able to be self calibrated. The reason being the shape of the tank will mean a big error on the gauge as for example, half the fuel capacity is probably less that 1/3 up the tank. What sender did you use, there was no e-bay link to that, just 2 links to the gauge itself. Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 I forgot to ask if your gauge is able to be self calibrated. The reason being the shape of the tank will mean a big error on the gauge as for example, half the fuel capacity is probably less that 1/3 up the tank.What sender did you use, there was no e-bay link to that, just 2 links to the gauge itself. Kev Hi Kev,sorry the second link was meant to show the capacitor sender,but you can still scroll down that link and it will give you the sender you will need it is 16 inches longhttp://www.ebay.com/itm/Fuel-level-sender-capacitor-type-no-moving-cut-to-length-10-16-0-5-5V-output-/261453858570 just click the picture of the capacitor to verify the lengtht is the right one you will order.No the shape of the tank has nothing to do with the fuel level calibration it just reads the fuel level on the alluminium tube, here is a link to explain how they work,its too much to write about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0du-QU1Q0T4.Its got the instructions how to calibrate on the link I mentioned before,just turn the screws eitherway on empty then the same when full,it explains it on that link on ebay i mentiond before, they are very accurate believe me.No I did not get it in writing from Steve,but Ill try Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 I forgot to ask if your gauge is able to be self calibrated. The reason being the shape of the tank will mean a big error on the gauge as for example, half the fuel capacity is probably less that 1/3 up the tank.What sender did you use, there was no e-bay link to that, just 2 links to the gauge itself. Kev Hi Kev,sorry the second link was meant to show the capacitor sender,but you can still scroll down that link and it will give you the sender you will need it is 16 inches longhttp://www.ebay.com/itm/Fuel-level-sender-capacitor-type-no-moving-cut-to-length-10-16-0-5-5V-output-/261453858570 just click the picture of the capacitor to verify the lengtht is the right one you will order.No the shape of the tank has nothing to do with the fuel level calibration it just reads the fuel level on the alluminium tube, here is a link to explain how they work,its too much to write about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0du-QU1Q0T4.Its got the instructions how to calibrate on the link I mentioned before,just turn the screws eitherway on empty then the same when full,it explains it on that link on ebay i mentiond before, they are very accurate believe me.No I did not get it in writing from Steve,but Ill try Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerochute Kev Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Hi Fred, I will presume you have the standard Aerochute tank from your previous descriptions. I will use my tank as an example as I know they did vary in size a little bit. As the tank is not square or rectangular, but more triangular the only times your gauge is accurate is when the tank is full or empty. My tank is 400mm high and full is 34lts. Down 1oomm (3/4 on the dial) is approx 29lts left in the tank, Half way on the dial is approx 21lts left in the tank, 1/4 on the dial is approx 13lts left in the tank. First 1/4 used is 5 lts Second 1/4 is 8 lts Third 1/4 is 8 lts last 1/4 is 13 lts By calibration I meant the gauge needs to be able to be calibrated at various levels to read correctly, and to date no one has found one that is suitable. As you can see, if you are flying and have used 1/2 a tank according to the fuel level the gauge reads, you have actually used 13 lts, and still have 21lts left, a lot more than half your fuel. Actually closer to 2/3. This is a big reason no one uses them. I would think however you could possibly remove the face of the dial and make a new one with the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 markings in the correct place. That would make it very reliable Cheers, Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerochute Kev Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Hi Fred, I will presume you have the standard Aerochute tank from your previous descriptions. I will use my tank as an example as I know they did vary in size a little bit. As the tank is not square or rectangular, but more triangular the only times your gauge is accurate is when the tank is full or empty. My tank is 400mm high and full is 34lts. Down 1oomm (3/4 on the dial) is approx 29lts left in the tank, Half way on the dial is approx 21lts left in the tank, 1/4 on the dial is approx 13lts left in the tank. First 1/4 used is 5 lts Second 1/4 is 8 lts Third 1/4 is 8 lts last 1/4 is 13 lts By calibration I meant the gauge needs to be able to be calibrated at various levels to read correctly, and to date no one has found one that is suitable. As you can see, if you are flying and have used 1/2 a tank according to the fuel level the gauge reads, you have actually used 13 lts, and still have 21lts left, a lot more than half your fuel. Actually closer to 2/3. This is a big reason no one uses them. I would think however you could possibly remove the face of the dial and make a new one with the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 markings in the correct place. That would make it very reliable Cheers, Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 Hi Fred, I will presume you have the standard Aerochute tank from your previous descriptions. I will use my tank as an example as I know they did vary in size a little bit. As the tank is not square or rectangular, but more triangular the only times your gauge is accurate is when the tank is full or empty. My tank is 400mm high and full is 34lts. Down 1oomm (3/4 on the dial) is approx 29lts left in the tank, Half way on the dial is approx 21lts left in the tank, 1/4 on the dial is approx 13lts left in the tank.First 1/4 used is 5 lts Second 1/4 is 8 lts Third 1/4 is 8 lts last 1/4 is 13 lts By calibration I meant the gauge needs to be able to be calibrated at various levels to read correctly, and to date no one has found one that is suitable. As you can see, if you are flying and have used 1/2 a tank according to the fuel level the gauge reads, you have actually used 13 lts, and still have 21lts left, a lot more than half your fuel. Actually closer to 2/3. This is a big reason no one uses them. I would think however you could possibly remove the face of the dial and make a new one with the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 markings in the correct place. That would make it very reliable Cheers, Kev Gday Kev True Kev just place some markers around the gauge when doing the calculations as your pouring in the fuel What I can really say about these gauges is I have emptied and filled a few times over to check the reliability and the accuracy of the needle is always spot on, no variations that was my main concern.I think as you said they are a safety issue,i think not a luxury but a necessity,nothing worse than taking up passengers of different weights thus using more or less fuel and then running out of fuel because one simply guessed wrong.At least with the gauge you know where you are,but it does not mean i throw away the old wrist stop watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 17, 2015 Author Share Posted August 17, 2015 Hi Fred, I will presume you have the standard Aerochute tank from your previous descriptions. I will use my tank as an example as I know they did vary in size a little bit. As the tank is not square or rectangular, but more triangular the only times your gauge is accurate is when the tank is full or empty. My tank is 400mm high and full is 34lts. Down 1oomm (3/4 on the dial) is approx 29lts left in the tank, Half way on the dial is approx 21lts left in the tank, 1/4 on the dial is approx 13lts left in the tank.First 1/4 used is 5 lts Second 1/4 is 8 lts Third 1/4 is 8 lts last 1/4 is 13 lts By calibration I meant the gauge needs to be able to be calibrated at various levels to read correctly, and to date no one has found one that is suitable. As you can see, if you are flying and have used 1/2 a tank according to the fuel level the gauge reads, you have actually used 13 lts, and still have 21lts left, a lot more than half your fuel. Actually closer to 2/3. This is a big reason no one uses them. I would think however you could possibly remove the face of the dial and make a new one with the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 markings in the correct place. That would make it very reliable Cheers, Kev Gday Kev True Kev just place some markers around the gauge when doing the calculations as your pouring in the fuel What I can really say about these gauges is I have emptied and filled a few times over to check the reliability and the accuracy of the needle is always spot on, no variations that was my main concern.I think as you said they are a safety issue,i think not a luxury but a necessity,nothing worse than taking up passengers of different weights thus using more or less fuel and then running out of fuel because one simply guessed wrong.At least with the gauge you know where you are,but it does not mean i throw away the old wrist stop watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 18, 2015 Author Share Posted August 18, 2015 Hi Fred, I will presume you have the standard Aerochute tank from your previous descriptions. I will use my tank as an example as I know they did vary in size a little bit. As the tank is not square or rectangular, but more triangular the only times your gauge is accurate is when the tank is full or empty. My tank is 400mm high and full is 34lts. Down 1oomm (3/4 on the dial) is approx 29lts left in the tank, Half way on the dial is approx 21lts left in the tank, 1/4 on the dial is approx 13lts left in the tank.First 1/4 used is 5 lts Second 1/4 is 8 lts Third 1/4 is 8 lts last 1/4 is 13 lts By calibration I meant the gauge needs to be able to be calibrated at various levels to read correctly, and to date no one has found one that is suitable. As you can see, if you are flying and have used 1/2 a tank according to the fuel level the gauge reads, you have actually used 13 lts, and still have 21lts left, a lot more than half your fuel. Actually closer to 2/3. This is a big reason no one uses them. I would think however you could possibly remove the face of the dial and make a new one with the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 markings in the correct place. That would make it very reliable Cheers, Kev Hi Kev,This is what your true readings will be on your dial.The sender being calibrated on empty one inch above bottom of tank,will give you 4lts reserve about 15mins flying at 15lts p/h,then my tank being a standard Aerochute tank 34lts filled to the brim. Then I started adding 7.5lts,marking 1/4,adding 7.5lts again marking 1/2 adding another 7.5 lts marking 3/4.Empty and full already calibrated stays the same.Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 18, 2015 Author Share Posted August 18, 2015 Hi Fred, I will presume you have the standard Aerochute tank from your previous descriptions. I will use my tank as an example as I know they did vary in size a little bit. As the tank is not square or rectangular, but more triangular the only times your gauge is accurate is when the tank is full or empty. My tank is 400mm high and full is 34lts. Down 1oomm (3/4 on the dial) is approx 29lts left in the tank, Half way on the dial is approx 21lts left in the tank, 1/4 on the dial is approx 13lts left in the tank.First 1/4 used is 5 lts Second 1/4 is 8 lts Third 1/4 is 8 lts last 1/4 is 13 lts By calibration I meant the gauge needs to be able to be calibrated at various levels to read correctly, and to date no one has found one that is suitable. As you can see, if you are flying and have used 1/2 a tank according to the fuel level the gauge reads, you have actually used 13 lts, and still have 21lts left, a lot more than half your fuel. Actually closer to 2/3. This is a big reason no one uses them. I would think however you could possibly remove the face of the dial and make a new one with the 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 markings in the correct place. That would make it very reliable Cheers, Kev Hi Kev,This is what your true readings will be on your dial.The sender being calibrated on empty one inch above bottom of tank,will give you 4lts reserve about 15mins flying at 15lts p/h,then my tank being a standard Aerochute tank 34lts filled to the brim. Then I started adding 7.5lts,marking 1/4,adding 7.5lts again marking 1/2 adding another 7.5 lts marking 3/4.Empty and full already calibrated stays the same.Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerochute Kev Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 I like the face on the dial of that gauge. It appears to have a wider range of movement than most others and should be more accurate. If it could be disassembled to change the face I would think a new face actually marked in liters instead of 1/2, 1/4 etc would be fantastic. It appears there would be room for that which you would not get on a normal gauge with less movement showing from empty to full. Looks like the total cost landed for both sender and gauge is about $124. Pretty good value i think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerochute Kev Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 I like the face on the dial of that gauge. It appears to have a wider range of movement than most others and should be more accurate. If it could be disassembled to change the face I would think a new face actually marked in liters instead of 1/2, 1/4 etc would be fantastic. It appears there would be room for that which you would not get on a normal gauge with less movement showing from empty to full. Looks like the total cost landed for both sender and gauge is about $124. Pretty good value i think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 19, 2015 Author Share Posted August 19, 2015 I like the face on the dial of that gauge. It appears to have a wider range of movement than most others and should be more accurate. If it could be disassembled to change the face I would think a new face actually marked in liters instead of 1/2, 1/4 etc would be fantastic. It appears there would be room for that which you would not get on a normal gauge with less movement showing from empty to full. Looks like the total cost landed for both sender and gauge is about $124. Pretty good value i think. I like the face on the dial of that gauge. It appears to have a wider range of movement than most others and should be more accurate. If it could be disassembled to change the face I would think a new face actually marked in liters instead of 1/2, 1/4 etc would be fantastic. It appears there would be room for that which you would not get on a normal gauge with less movement showing from empty to full. Looks like the total cost landed for both sender and gauge is about $124. Pretty good value i think. Glad you like it and I could be of some help.Ive done some searching around and this set up is the best price going around.I liked those ultrasound fuel flow readers you clamp on your fuel line,but for $2000 AUD a bit pricey for a paddock machine.If you are interested in buying the gauge and sender and have trouble getting the brass nipple,Ive got a couple here I can send out to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred cenko Posted August 19, 2015 Author Share Posted August 19, 2015 I like the face on the dial of that gauge. It appears to have a wider range of movement than most others and should be more accurate. If it could be disassembled to change the face I would think a new face actually marked in liters instead of 1/2, 1/4 etc would be fantastic. It appears there would be room for that which you would not get on a normal gauge with less movement showing from empty to full. Looks like the total cost landed for both sender and gauge is about $124. Pretty good value i think. I like the face on the dial of that gauge. It appears to have a wider range of movement than most others and should be more accurate. If it could be disassembled to change the face I would think a new face actually marked in liters instead of 1/2, 1/4 etc would be fantastic. It appears there would be room for that which you would not get on a normal gauge with less movement showing from empty to full. Looks like the total cost landed for both sender and gauge is about $124. Pretty good value i think. Glad you like it and I could be of some help.Ive done some searching around and this set up is the best price going around.I liked those ultrasound fuel flow readers you clamp on your fuel line,but for $2000 AUD a bit pricey for a paddock machine.If you are interested in buying the gauge and sender and have trouble getting the brass nipple,Ive got a couple here I can send out to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now