jetjr Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 I think US LSA has max cruise speed, and stall speed is "clean" ie a reasonable bit slower than AU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 PoterooIf removing the max speed numbers is helping someone/anyone, how about removing that Anti safety "wing loading" number for 95-10 aircraft !, Haveing a good strong aircraft must out-way (6+ 6-G) having a flimsy aircraft that only just holds together on climb out. I have worked out how to beat the beaurocrates, but not to any advantage to aviation. spacesailor We’ve had the alternate to wing loading in 95.10 for 20 years ... it’s called single seat 95.55 and it’s got a stall speed limit rather than the proxy of wing area. If you or anyone wants to built a Hummel that cannot meet the 95.10 limits of wing area you are and have been free to do so for 20 years and register it with 19- on the side 30kg/m^2 as a proxy for demonstrated stall speed or claimed stall speed is a simple measurable test and it is possible to build a very strong airframe within this limits BUT you will not have the weight capacity to add bells and whistles like brakes and big electrical systems and instruments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now