Jump to content

Running without a prop


jordy

Recommended Posts

Guest Qwerty

No mate. The prop is the only flywheel that the engine has. The prop also provides constant load to the engine which I seem to remember is significant.

 

Short answer....No.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest brentc
Interestingly, I tried to turn over a jab engine without a prop and the electric starter couldn't turn it with out the flywheel effect.

I have had no such problems running my Jabiru engine without a prop and have never heard of such a complaint. The flywheel is at the rear of the engine and the prop is not the flywheel so it has no relevance.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely you jest. Jabiru advise against running without the prop IN CAPITAL LETTERS so there must be a reason. Having a flywheel at the rear is OK but perhaps the engine is designed around having the additions flywheel effect of the prop at the front to reduce twisting loads on the crank. Jabiru put loads of design work into making it light, so I bet the engine relies on the prop for some of its flywheel effect. Lets be very careful with advice here.

 

Old Koreelah

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest brentc

Indeed the manual says this below, however my comments were moreso regarding:

 

Interestingly, I tried to turn over a jab engine without a prop and the electric starter couldn't turn it with out the flywheel effect.'

 

May I suggest Ian that you try charging your battery if it won't turn over!

 

I've had this discussion with the factory before otherwise I wouldn't have posted, the warning is purely regarding heat damage. New engines, tight rings, easily over-revved etc as it can get away from you very quickly without a prop. You don't see car engines self destructing whilst sitting at the traffic lights! Those Jabiru propellors would have to be the most unbalanced flywheel to ever go on an engine!

 

WARNING



 

 

 

Engine MUST NEVER BE RUN WITHOUT THE PROPELLER. Damage

 

 

 

 

 



will occur in this state.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ozzie

Auto engine has either a very heavy flywheel or a convertor pumping oil for the auto transmission. unbalanced or not the prop is an effective flywheel. accelleration rates need to be controlled. if a two stroke say a robin 440, idles normally at 1200 rpm and removing the direct drive prop and starting will give you 3500 idle i think from memory. and is wizzed right up there real fast.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've ground run both 447 and 912 engines without props. No problems, but be very careful with throttle as they can over-rev very quickly without the load.

 

JG

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My engine was the 1600 jab and yes it does have a flywheel, but it is very light and the battery was used in a Corolla with no problems. It just couldn't get going enough to get past the first compression.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys this might sound like a basic question but....... is it ok to ground run an engine ( In this case a 582 in a drifter) without a prop and if so are there any precautions.

I have started and run a 582 without a prop just to check the timing at idle with a strobe light. I had a funny feeling about getting too close to a 72 inch 3 blade mincer muncher and dicer.

 

No problems occured however the idle was way too high and the motor was very twitchy on throttle responses. Probably not a good idea to run the engine without a prop unless you really have to? If you start your engine on idle as you normally would if you're using choke expect it to idle at around 3500, thats the only advice and info I can give you, I hope it helps.

 

Knighty

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ozzie

Knighty when they run conties and lycs in a test cell they use a load prop basically a short club that does not develope much thrust or noise but is suitable to give adequate load for the engine. years ago when i worked for OMC evinrude/johnson. the engines where test run and tuned in a tank whith a no thrust load prop. maybe you should look at something like that or try and transfer the timing marks to the other end or just static time it.

 

i hate tuning the pumper carbs on my lazair you have to get in between the leading edge and the prop to get to them. If i can i run them on the test stand first and then i can get behind the engine. still scarey but risking a finger is better than offering the head.

 

ozzie

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The fan will be providing enough load for a bench test. I really like the accurate balanced throttle control sheesh real pro this guy.

 

i still would not run any engine with no load or flywheel.

 

Onya Major!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Qwerty

WHY????

 

This tread is just insane.

 

Who knows what harmonics are being developed with no prop. I dare someone to ask Rod Stiff about running Jabs with no prop.

 

Again WHY???

 

Bahhh I give up.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Maj Millard

The main damage you would do by running an engine and gearbox without a prop is at the gearbox cog contact surface. It is designed and adjusted to have a constant load on the contact surface, not an off/on hammering contact. There could also be possible crankshaft stresses introduced, that they are not designed for. Not the smartest idea really...........................................................................thumb_down

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...