Jump to content

Guernsey

Members
  • Posts

    2,712
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Posts posted by Guernsey

  1. I agree with you Nev that rear seat flying in the L4 was weird, when taxiing, visibility forward was non existent so zigzaging was necessary, my rudder pedals were on both sides of the front seat, not good with a large passenger, I also had to ask the passenger to move their head to one side on landing so that I could read the instruments. Prop starting was no problem because my regular passengers were pilots so I climbed in the back whilst they prop started then jumped in.

     

    I only ever flew the aircraft from the front seat on one occasion, with a rear passenger, and found it very cramped with my knees up against the dash panel.

     

    I believe that when the aircraft was restored in Manilla the front seat may have been positioned more forward to give more room for the pilot in the rear.

     

    Bearing in mind that the military L4 would have more leg room in the front (pilot) because the observer in the rear would be facing the rear so his legs would go under the 'parcel shelf'.

     

    In spite of this, with the clear Perspex over the entire cabin area visibility was excellent when flying inverted. 008_roflmao.gif.692a1fa1bc264885482c2a384583e343.gif 087_sorry.gif.8f9ce404ad3aa941b2729edb25b7c714.gif

     

    Alan.

     

     

    • Haha 1
  2. The early L4's were used as artillery spotter aircraft the pilot being in the front with an artillery spotter in the rear facing backwards with what we would regard as a rear parcel shelf, was his map table which he used to report back artillery or tank positions to their own artillery guns. Proved to be quite successful.

     

    My Cub was facing forward and yes the pilot flew from the back seat. (A genuine back seat driver.)

     

    Alan.

     

     

  3. My L4 Cub had the 65hp engine and was very easy to handstart from behind. It didn't have a park brake so I had to chock the wheels with a rope joined to both chocks and back to the cockpit, I then climbed in and retrieved the chocks by pulling them inside. A very nice fun aeroplane and I wish I had kept it and been able to register it Raaus.

     

    Alan Marriette.

     

    Note the rego LFJ.....L4j.

     

    2096190317_L4compressed.jpg.ddaeb850c472ccd3fbe0c4153f7e6500.jpg

     

     

    • Like 4
    • Agree 1
  4. Further to the above, I have not been able to find my own photo of the aircraft in question but a google search under Vickers Valetta WG259 should do the trick. The aircraft was based at RAF Tangmere and flew over to Guernsey to accommodate the RAF cadets at the Elizabeth College in Guernsey.

     

    Ah! the memories.

     

    Alan.

     

     

  5. That's nothing new, just more up to date. As a teenager in the air cadets I have flown several times in Vickers Valetta aircraft which had several domes along the top of the fuselage. These were navigational training aircraft whereby we could stand on our tables in front of us and have a 360 degree view to visually check our position. After our training exercise we were allowed to have a go at flying the aircraft which was good fun if some cadets were still standing on the tables as a quick 'G' turn dropped them to the floor in the centre aisle. Wish I had photos to show you.

     

    Alan.

     

     

    • Informative 1
  6. There's plenty if such examples of ignorance. It an inquiry involving motorcycles it was stated that they would be safer if they didn't lean over on corners.A judge in a matter concerning the DH Drover, in a great display of genius said.

    Er.... this Aircraft has three engines does it not?

     

    Yes your honour.

     

    Which side does it have two engines on? ,,,,,,? Nev

    The outside.096_tongue_in_cheek.gif.d94cd15a1277d7bcd941bb5f4b93139c.gif

     

    Alan.

     

     

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...