Jump to content

Blackhawk

Members
  • Posts

    233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Blackhawk

  1. Hi Kyle

     

    No, it wasn't a stipulation of the council, but all residential subdivisions are governed by a covenant which identifies the types of buildings allowed to be built and this is put in place by the developer and supplied to council as part of the Development Application.

     

    As far as termites are concerned, yes they are around everywhere in Qld, and most other states; it's just the species vary's.

     

    I live at Pacific Haven on 6 acres and built my house 10 years ago with a treated pine frame and Hebal panel exterior and haven't had any problems with termites and have never had the house sprayed for pests.

     

    A professional Gold Coast builder on the other hand, with probably 40 odd years experience built a very expensive home on the other side of the airstrip here and had all his skirting's, architraves and door jambs eaten out with white ants within 2 years because he used ordinary pine (and he's a professional)

     

    In termite areas you should use either Meranti, Tasmanian Oak or cypress pine for all your trims which white ants will not touch and always keep a minimum 100mm vertical barrier from the ground level to the slab (yes, my house is on a slab)

     

    Unfortunately there won't be any colourbond clad buildings allowed except for 1 aircraft hangar per lot in attached, semi-detached or detached form.

     

     

  2. Hello All members,

     

    Just letting you all know that the (Yengarie Airpark, west of Maryborough in Queensland) now has its official name of AQUILA AIRPARK.

     

    The airpark was approved for development by the Fraser Coast Regional Council in October last year and currently survey work is now being undertaken starting with the Maryborough/Biggenden State Main Road intersection being upgraded to cater for the traffic into the Airpark Estate.

     

    I will be posting more information in the next few days and months to come and keeping you all updated on the progress for those of you that may be interested in setting down your wheels here.

     

    Graeme

     

     

    • Like 1
  3. aj_

     

    The engine's top rpm is 13,000, it is governed to 10,000 and runs through a 1.5:1 reduction which gives it the cruise rpm of 6,600 rpm. Ducted fans only operate to around 7000 rpm maximum.

     

    The screaming noise is the ducted fan not the engine.

     

    The team of UL-39 project is not a company but a group of University Undergraduates from the Aeronautical engineering faculty in the Czech Republic who were doing this as part of their thesis for Aeronautical Engineering and as no one has ever really succeeded in building and flying a Ducted Fan Jet (other than the Jet-hawk which was far from successful) until now; then they should be applauded for their hard work over the last 10 years to achieve the holy grail of ducted fan aircraft flight.

     

    Lets hope they or someone else develop this for a ready to fly or kit that would be available to anyone around the world.

     

    For those complaining about the top speed, well if 120 knots is not faster enough for a 580mm ducted fan pushing a jet weighing 450kg MTOW aircraft; then you should buy yourself a real L-39 and shares in a fuel company to run it.

     

    At least with our 544kg rule we could add more fuel and heavier pilots so long as it was approved by the production company for that weight in other countries.

     

     

    • Like 1
  4. This is for all you inspiring Jet Jockeys.

     

    A very good friend of mine, Josef from the Czech Republic who used to live here in Aus but returned to his homeland about 6 years ago.

     

    He has been keeping me updated on the progress of the all carbon fibre Ducted Fan Ultralight Jet a group of University people specialising in aviation have been working on for about 10 years and they finally have their Ultralight replica L39 completed and flying.

     

    Check out the Pics, a brilliant dream come to life!P1130979.JPG.6a6a32ea4f1ab61e5eb8a7a0342e902e.JPG

     

    This is all the info I have at the moment and as soon as he sends me all the specs I will put them here.

     

    P1130991.JPG.a1ec141c47fed9229c1a931dac5c36dc.JPG

     

    P1130997.JPG.cd18f3b4ac94ac993e68ae2132ddd280.JPG

     

    P1150007.JPG.00198c63688c2a93b39244a24ea01b9d.JPG

     

    P1150015.JPG.78c96168698000195f99e86d4b69c9a5.JPG

     

    P1150023.JPG.a52649536f5423639fa06ed5c9d9257d.JPG

     

     

    • Like 3
  5. The wing construction of the original BD4 - WAS composite - and was built in moulded sections fitted to a tubular spar, Chris used the same construction for

     

    the Sparrow aircraft (photos below) where he got the idea from Jim Bede's BD4 (and possibly a set of plans).

     

    It is a very simple and strong way to build wings, once you have the mould for a left and right section.

     

    I bought a set of plans for the composite wing construction from Bede Corp. about 14 years ago; anyone could buy them and they are probably still available.

     

    837449130_Sparrowwing1.jpg.e1494d8c3a26836501ee2c728267c8f3.jpg

     

    .

     

    442990855_Sparrowwing2.jpg.bd341efaf7672998f15d1dd1762b8fa5.jpg

     

     

    • Informative 1
  6. Once title is granted, there is little the Council can do. The planning part is there to mitigate future problems. Developers will "tell you anything.." to get the approval at the least cost to them. Then future land owners have to live with it. I suspect the restriction to <600kg recreational had to do with the developer talking his way out of sealing the strip and taxiway by saying they won't fly much and they prefer grass. The land owners (the Body Corp) will have to deal with complaints from Council about GA aircraft and excessive noise, movements etc. and pay the rates, insurance, maintenance etc on the strip and club-house (landing fees anyone?). Then again, as I have seen before, the whole thing could be on-sold to another developer as a potential for $11mil in sales for little outlay, for them to develop. This development is not attractive to me, as firstly we would have to hangar one of our planes elsewhere and never fly home with it, secondly I think the house/hangar build and on-going body corp costs (going into retirement) will be more than we can justify and thirdly, it looks just like suburbia. It might suit someone else with a spare $mil.

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    Just thought I would let you all know a bit about the developer of this airpark.

     

    I’ve got to know the owner very well after my contact with him 8 years ago when he first started this project.

     

    The developers are Derek and Ginny Gould who are very nice down to earth people and Derek is also a RAAus pilot.

     

    Living in Sydney they found the airfields Derek flew from were being swallowed up by developers for residential developments, so they started looking for alternatives for themselves and were told about this property in Yengarie near Maryborough that had an airstrip.

     

    After coming up to have a look they decided to purchase this property but at that time had no thought of an Airpark Development.

     

    After they began living at the property they were told an American developer had looked at this property a couple of years previously to turn it into an airpark but couldn't convince the local council at the time of its potential.

     

    Derek then started to look into the idea of developing part of the property as a Residential Airpark Estate which over the past 8 years has had untold brick walls put in place by local councils at the time, changes in state government policies, council amalgamations etc; any sane person would have put it in the too hard basket and forgotten about it.

     

    Luckily with the change of government when Newman took over, most of the restrictions that the Bligh government put in place were removed, so Derek decided to give it another go and see if he could get it approved, which finally after another 3 years and a lot of expense, it was approved by the current Fraser Coast Regional Council who are very pro aviation.

     

    So Sue, I find your comments regarding what you say the developer is going to do and the assumptions you make on his behalf which are totally absurd and for a person who is a Civil Engineer and has worked with councils I couldn't believe my eyes when I read your comments; especially when the only credible statement was “This development is not attractive to me”

     

    Remember the old saying “You can please some of the people some of the time, but you'll never please all of the people all of the time” How true that is.

     

    Some information that you may be oblivious to is that; nearly every Residential Airpark in Australia is operated by a Body Corporate formed by the owners of properties within the airpark, even the new Gympie, Cumulus Airpark is operated this way.

     

    I assume that if no current airparks meet your criteria you may be thinking of developing your own airpark especially with your credentials as a Civil Engineer, (but then I doubt that would ever happen.)

     

    And by the way, all the blocks are Freehold and Derek (as the owner of the existing residence on the property) will be a member of the Body Corporate with the same 1 Vote that every other property owner has in the development.

     

     

  7. I have spoken to the developer of Yengarie Airpark and the requirements are; No relocatable homes of any type are permitted, all homes to be built with new materials with roofs being tiles or colourbond (no galvanised or zinc allowed) and full colourbond homes will not be permitted.

     

    Only one residence and one hanger allowed per lot.

     

    The hangars may be freestanding, attached to or be part of the dwelling with a minimum of 144 sqm and maximum of 360 sqm.

     

    Developer will be providing to each lot; Power (underground), sealed roads, storm water drainage from lots, crossovers, telecommunication services.

     

    All lot owners will be members of the Body Corporate which will own the airstrip, roads and public areas and control/maintain all operations of the airpark.

     

    Septic systems and household water systems are the responsibility of each lot owner.

     

    The developer will be providing a community amenities complex with building, BBQ facilities, Emergency and Fire appliance as well as a 200,000ltr water storage facility (for emergency use only).

     

    Any future increase in MTOW weight by recreational aviation bodies will be included into the Airpark Operations and Safety manual.

     

    GA exclusion was not the directive of the developer, but was a condition imposed by FCRC. (as there will be 3 other Airparks all catering for GA aircraft and within 35km of each other on the Fraser Coast)

     

    If an aircraft is registered GA then it is NOT allowed to operate from the airpark. (GA registered aircraft may land at the Airpark only in emergency situation)

     

    Aircraft types Permitted (under 600kg MTOW including future weight increases) are;

     

    Fixed-wing aircraft

     

    Helicopters and gyrocopters

     

    Motorgliders

     

    Powered parachutes

     

    Microlights/trikes.

     

    The Fraser Coast Regional Council will be the pioneer for setting the benchmark in airparks, which hopefully other Councils around Australia will now follow.

     

     

    • Like 1
  8. GREAT NEWS!! .......for anyone looking for scenic coastlines, great weather all year round and semi-rural living.

     

    Today, 21st October 2015, the Fraser Coast Regional Council APPROVED the Yengarie Airpark development 15km west of Maryborough on the Fraser Coast.

     

    Finally after 8 years of hard negotiations across many desks, sanity has prevailed and will make the Fraser Coast region an Airpark Mecca having

     

    3 airparks in the region.

     

    Yengarie Airpark is strictly for RAAus and ASRA aircraft under 600kg, the other 2 are GA airparks; one near Hervey Bay and the other at Maryborough Airport.

     

    All blocks in the Yengarie Airpark are Freehold title and will be in a secure gated community estate.

     

    Here is the layout of the Airpark with lots 1 to 59 for sale but excluding lot 43 which has been set aside for Community facilities; Club house, BBQ area etc.

     

    ****NOTE! Stage 7 may not proceed but if it does, there will only be 3 lots available for sale, 61, 62 and 63; lot 60 remains part of the existing property.

     

    824227557_YengarieAirparkapprovedlayout.jpg.3486d25440755bee06af1ad7bb5e2102.jpg

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...