Jump to content

Keenaviator

Members
  • Posts

    658
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Keenaviator

  1. I would go for the 230. Faster, the six cylinder motor is smoother. The extra fuel is not important. Handles hot conditions better performance wise. Use faster climb speed..Nev

    I've always found it odd that people say the 6 is smoother than the 4. I've always felt that the 6 has more resonances and low frequency noise than the 4. This also applied to the Continental 0200 (4) and 0300 (6).

     

    Laurie

     

     

    • Like 1
  2. Hi Emah. Your dad has been showing a lot of interest in paragliding and he says you are keen too. I have some leave in August and plan to be doing a bit of paragliding.

     

    Laurie

     

     

    • Like 1
  3. Bigger span wings would have to affect the cruise speed. ( less effect when you are heavy) Getting out of short strips on a hot day would be better though. Nev.

    Depends on the relationship of parasitic drag to induced drag. At any given speed and load a long wing will have less induced drag than a shorter wing but more parasitic drag and vice versa.

    Laurie

     

     

  4. The beauty of the paraglider is that a lot of the important skills can by maintained by 'ground handling'. As with any flying I think it's important to regularly maintain your skills (that's what I tell my wife anyway!!). Not many paramotor pilots bother trying to thermal. I've heard of much older people continuing to fly paragliders but sticking mainly to nice laminar coastal air. PM me Phil if you are interested in having a phone yack in relation to this subject before we get growled at for thread drift!

     

    Laurie

     

     

    • Informative 1
  5. Landing down wind with legs for an undercarriage does sound bad. Love the idea of paragliding, silent flight, thermaling etc but seems to me to require a fair degree of athleticism, adding a motor opens up more choices but the seems to introduce extra risks and potential noise problems with small high revving engines.The only time I've seen para motoring up close was at a fly-in were this guy was zooming about at low level, I suppose he might have been showing off but seemed risky to me, steep turns low to the ground, taking off wasn't easy either with a lot of manoeuvring on the ground to get the wing settled overhead etc.

    I would agree that using a foot launched powered paraglider would require a certain amount of athleticism. I have several paragliding (not powered) mates in their 60's and not especially athletic but having developed and maintained the required skills, they are continuing to safely enjoy their flying.

     

    Regards, Laurie

     

     

  6. All wrong ,powered parachutes are easiest ,don't even need to watch airspeed ,ready in 5 min to fly,and fits on a trailer to take anywhere ,true low and slow ,no fatalities with aerochute ever,hard to beat unless you really want to fly somewhere

    No fatalies ever, that's amazing. I believe there was a saying about the Pipe Cub, that it was so safe it was only barely capable of killing you or words to that effect.020_yes.gif.58d361886eb042a872e78a875908e414.gif

     

     

  7. I've been using either BP 98 or shell , no problems with the fuel or the tanks, but it's made a hell ova mess of my lexan windows.What resin are jabiru using?

    Probably the stuff they build the aircraft with, an aroldite product.

     

    Some time ago I did some tests strips of glass with 'bote cote' the resin soaking in jars of mogas and avgas for well over 12 months. The glass reinforced with 'bote cote' appeared to be unaffected. I used it to secure the fuel cap insert in my Starlet fuel tank and it is still going strong.

     

    Laurie

     

     

  8. Apparently Jabiru are recommending that if we use mogas, stick with 95 which doesn't have as much of the aromatics which are believed to be responsible to damaging Jabiru fuel tanks. I've just sloshed my with 'Creme' which is supposed to be resistant to even ethanol blends, not that I will be testing it knowingly.

     

    Laurie

     

     

  9. Thanks Andy, I could have put it better. There is a middle ground and in Victoria that is not to exceed the prescribed content ( full licence holders in private cars and motorcycles 0.05 grams of alcohol per 28 litres of exhaled air).

     

    Regarding the decision to drive, that should be made before the drinking.

     

    I think we haves drifted a bit off thread!

     

    Cheers Laurie

     

     

  10. Lyle the crazy part of the law is that you can actually be booked at 0.05 you are only safe at 0.049 and below. Quite misleading in my opinion, because all the advertising campaigns state that 0.05 is the legal limit. Go figure that one.

    That's interesting Dave. Where is it said you are safe below 0.05%? It's pretty simple really; if you decide to drink then also decide not to drive.

    If your aircraft's stall speed is 50 then is it safe at 49 or 51 for that matter?

     

    Regards, Laurie.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    • Caution 1
×
×
  • Create New...