thanks for the input there mate, that was very helpful. I certainly agree about the gliding thing, I am a glider pilot myself and the training reinforced by GFA is what has had me so shocked regarding RA AUS.
I think I should make it clear hear to everyone however, What I am refering to is in actual fact the incipient spin, not a developed spin, I would never put any aircraft into a full spin without knowing every nitty gritty detail regarding this aircraft and spinning first. Im certainly no Chuck Yeager and am not wanting to be pushing envolopes. I must say however the information you provided regarding the VG's was most interesting. regarding there difficulty going into a spin installed was certainly a consideration I had looked into and clearly found appealing. No one has ever mentioned however there difficulties in recovering from one.
I do however find your comments regarding the drifter and spins interesting. by no means am I saying there wrong. I by know means will pretend to have the knowledge to be able to comment in either direction with any form of confidence. Though as mentioned earlier, I was put through spin training in the drifters, and seen many others do it to. I just would have presumed that would have ment the aircraft (certified drifter) must have been certified for it. Also I know that Austflight did quite alot of spin testing on the aircraft, as I think HITC may be able to vouch for. Weather it was then certified for it I guess is another story! referencing back to my training however, while doing a couple of recovery's from very early stages of a developed spin (which while possibly not certified to do so, both the instructor and I, a far better educated student walked away from unharmed), 98 percent of the training was only incipient.
So I guess this brings us back to the base question is it legal to practice an INCIPIENT spin in RA outside of being under instruction.