Jump to content

Geoff_H

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    895

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Geoff_H

  1. Geoff_H
    Did you notice the Concorde? Aerodynamics designed by an Australian, Prof Tom Fink, an absolute genius.
  2. Geoff_H
    Posted email to him two weeks ago. No reply whatso ever. I have since been researching the internet dailey. Hence I am looking to this site.
  3. Geoff_H
    I have been trying to get building information on this aircraft. I have searched the website but there is no information such as build materials, build time, pictures during construction etc. To buy plans to find out information would cost 400Euro. Id anyone building one or have a set of plans or bill of materials?
  4. Geoff_H
    Anyone know contact information for John Corby
  5. Geoff_H
    Gas turbines only require tweeking to run on hydrogen. In the fifties a flight with hydrogen on one engine was undertaken. I believe that aircraft running on hydrogen is the future. A cryogenic tank would hold the hydrogen, very similar to some rocket engines. On an off target issue hydrogen is the answer to overnight stored energy.
  6. Geoff_H
    Looks great.
  7. Geoff_H
    Those plugs were made by using the 3d autocad file to make 2inch slices through the cabin, print the slices full size, transfering the prints to particle board, then using foam (the florist style foam) sandwiched in between the particle board and sanding using particle board as guides. Long and laborious but effective.
  8. Geoff_H
    The Plugs that I made and a print of a view of the AutoCAD file. Geoff
  9. Geoff_H
    Mooney have a steel frame around an aluminium skin in the pilot/passenger region. The tail is monocoque, the tail hinges off the steel frame to provide reduced drag trim. There are fewer deaths from Mooney accidents.
  10. Geoff_H
    I put 2 layers of Kevlar around the pilot area. It may have helped safety but took a huge toll on weight
  11. Geoff_H
    Somewhere I may have the 3D CAD files that I made, it was around 25 years ago. They were done in AutoCAD. I will have a look to see what has survived if interested.
  12. Geoff_H
    Some years ago I designed and partially finished the prototype of a very similar project. The two halves of the fuselage were a top and a bottom. The main issue with a monocoque skin. A section between bulkheads has to have buckling resistance. This is where I had difficulty with design,a single skin thickness either had a large weight to resist buckling of many bulkheads close together, I chose a composite skin, bad choice in retrospect. I had to mould a core to shape then "glue" it to the outer skin then epoxy a layer on the inside. Without the ability to experiment with strengths of composite structures I made it far too heavy. I was looking at doing a master's in aeronautical doing experimental techniques until I got an away from home contract and abandend the project. Maybe stringers that were cast and attached to the skinsin the moulds would have been better, hindsight is so 20-20 vision. I made two tails, one using this method and one using cut foam with a cast skin attached ( no sanding required) the greatest surprise was that there was no measurable difference in the final weight Good luck with your project. Geoff
  13. Geoff_H
    Yes Nev, getting old is a privilege denied many.
  14. Geoff_H
    Thanks Red. I getting too old. 😒
  15. Geoff_H
    Anybody know anything?
  16. Geoff_H
    My heads up display in my car is invisible with polarised sunglasses. I have two sets of sun glasses, one for driving, one for out of vehicle activities.
  17. Geoff_H
    Is thermal efficiency mechanical energy out divided by chemical energy in (ie fuel energy)?
  18. Geoff_H
    I didn't think that I had monocular vision but the optometrist told me I do. I hate glasses and have better vision than when I did use glasses then contacts. The monocular vision is more of a problem during the class 2 medical.
  19. Geoff_H
    I have roughly sketched the mathematical reason for engine speeding up as aircraft moves forward. Sorry it is so rough but somewhat busy at present. In summary, as the aircraft moves forward angle of incidence of prop blade to air gets smaller, thus the drag on the prop gets smaller so the engine speed will increase
  20. Geoff_H
    So if you stay in the cabin the electrons will flow through the skin of the aircraft. Just don't touch two different parts of the skin as you may get a potential difference through your body and electrocute yourself.
  21. Geoff_H
    With high voltage you never get electrocuted. Electrons repel each other so the current flows over the outside of the skin not through the body as required for electrocution. It does however create enormous heat and creates extre burns. HV burns you.
  22. Geoff_H
    The cabin is intact. Mooney's have a very high survivability. The cabin area is a steel space frame. The tail is monocoque structure.
  23. Geoff_H
    I think that the problem that I have with CASA is that it is perceived that i cannot judge distances with monocular vision. However this is not absolutely true. When trying to judge distances at very short range, around 6 inches, yes I have difficulty, th thread a needle by holding the needle axially, then it's just a matter of up down sideways movement. But catching a ball is no problem. Although my left eye is not in focus it is still used by the brain. The brain detects the the centre of the fuzzy ball and uses this and the infocus eye for distance perception. I am around 90% of before eye operation effectiveness. How I see 3D movies is still a wonder. My optometrist, unhappy that I am not buying glasses anymore, said that I could not catch a ball with this vision. It seems that this is a widely held misconception. I expect that this is why CASA believe that I need eye correction when flying. From what I read of USA situation is that if an eye specialist says that it is not restricting you you can get an exemption to needing eye correction. How do I get thos exemption in Aus. Do I go to politicians, eye specialists? Any and all ideas welcome! Geoff
  24. Geoff_H
    I think that the correct term is monocular as theoretically only one eye is being used at a time. However the reality is that both are usually being used. They are lenses the same as every person gets for cataract replacement.
  25. Geoff_H
    Had mine for 8 years now. My left eye has a 2 dioptor in it. I can read to around 6 inches up close
×
×
  • Create New...