skippydiesel Posted May 13 Posted May 13 (edited) Interesting . Didnt know RV were going down this well warn track (C150 et al), very like Sonex. Both are going for strut braced wings. Sonex seem to be continuing down their very basic aircraft philosophy - at this stage no wing tanks (crazy)😈 Edited May 13 by skippydiesel
facthunter Posted May 13 Posted May 13 Cessna's no strut wings haven't been that much of a great success. A C-182 is a great plane. I think you mean well WORN track.. Nev
Underwood Posted May 13 Posted May 13 This has been in prototype for quite some time now which could be a good thing. It looks the business and a modern all metal light Bush capable Taildragger is very much needed imo. If I could afford one It would be right at the top of my list.
rgmwa Posted May 13 Posted May 13 Good to see this project still progressing well after all the problems they've had, and that they're taking the time to do a thorough job on design and testing. Should be a very capable aircraft, but it won't be cheap. 1
skippydiesel Posted May 13 Posted May 13 (edited) I wonder how long the market will support "bush" type aircraft. Many have come & gone and many still remain. What is the attraction? Why don't pilots go for aircraft with wider speed envelopes (more efficient X country)? 😈 Edited May 13 by skippydiesel
rodgerc Posted May 13 Posted May 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, skippydiesel said: I wonder how long the market will support "bush" type aircraft. Many have come & gone and many still remain. What is the attraction? Why don't pilots go for aircraft with wider speed envelopes (more efficient X country)? 😈 In my case, it’s access to strips in interesting locations. I associate socially with a bunch of Vans RV owners….3 x RV10, 1 each RV14a, RV8, RV9a and a RV12. When the call went out recently for a jaunt to Orchid Beach on Fraser Island for lunch, only one thought the strip was acceptable….and he took his second aircraft, the red RANS S-21 in the background. 😊 Edited May 13 by rodgerc Typo 3
skippydiesel Posted May 14 Posted May 14 To each his own. "Schmick" looking planes - especially like the tail dragger I point out that you can have a 27 knot stall (STAL) AND a 135 knot cruise, using a 100 hp Rotax 912, that will take-off, on grass, in sub 100m and land in not much more. In other words, there are aircraft that are what I would call , a good compromise not, as most people seem to think, one or the other.😈 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now