rgmwa Posted Sunday at 06:52 AM Posted Sunday at 06:52 AM 7 minutes ago, facthunter said: I'd have one (RV-15). High praise indeed, Nev. Looks like its just passed its most challenging flight acceptance test! I'd have one too but doubt that I could afford it. 1 1
tillmanr Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago There are dorsal (top) fins or ventral (lower) fins. What is the difference in the placement of these? 1
Blueadventures Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 45 minutes ago, tillmanr said: There are dorsal (top) fins or ventral (lower) fins. What is the difference in the placement of these? They often correct or improve the aerodynamics of the profile, easiest way to sort flight characteristics sort of redesign. Looks like RV15 designed well and therefore not needed. 1
rgmwa Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago It will be interesting to see how well the RV-15 sells. It should do well, but either way it's a good indication that Vans are recovering from their Covid era problems and looking to the future. They make good aircraft and have a solid reputation, and it would be a sad day if they folded. 4
T510 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I'm a big fan of the RV15 from what I have seen so far. I wouldn't order a kit until they are completely available though, would suck to have the wing kit and then have Vans fold 1
facthunter Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago There's detailing to finish it off. ( I hope) Any Dorsal fin is there to energise the fin and rudder. Whatever is there It will make it more effective. Below the horizontal stabiliser it's an anti spin feature. Continuation of the rudder makes it better. Many rudders are too shielded by the other tail feathers to recover well from a spin,(upright spin). Nev
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now