BrendAn Posted July 27 Posted July 27 When I do a mag check on my 618 One drops 200 rpm but the other one drops about 800 rpm. Still seems to run fine at the lower rpm. Has anyone else had this happen, Wondering if it's just something to do with the tacho reading being wrong on that circuit. Other than that the engine runs great. 139 hours.
facthunter Posted July 27 Posted July 27 Could be a timing variation. Might be worth checking the settings Something fitting over each HT wire with the engine running. Keep away from the PROP. Put marks on the prop hub with a marker pen. Nev 1
BrendAn Posted July 27 Author Posted July 27 4 minutes ago, facthunter said: Could be a timing variation. Might be worth checking the settings Something fitting over each HT wire with the engine running. Keep away from the PROP. Put marks on the prop hub with a marker pen. Nev Can you adjust the timing on them. Never thought of that.
facthunter Posted July 27 Posted July 27 With dual Plugs the timing can sometimes be staggered. Check Factory figures.. IF much difference the REV drop will vary . Nev 1
BrendAn Posted July 27 Author Posted July 27 I looked it up. Trigger gaps are adjustable to change timing. I am going to see if it will climb on either mag. If it does I will leave it alone. If it doesn't will have to look into it. Trigger gaps should be 20 thou. 1
Thruster88 Posted July 27 Posted July 27 On my 582 the Rotax needle type tacho shows a drop of 50 rpm one side and 300 the other. There is almost no audible drop on either side, they sound the same. 800 rpm drop would be very dramatic in sound and vibration. Suspect your tacho is telling fibs. 2 1
BrendAn Posted July 27 Author Posted July 27 35 minutes ago, Thruster88 said: On my 582 the Rotax needle type tacho shows a drop of 50 rpm one side and 300 the other. There is almost no audible drop on either side, they sound the same. 800 rpm drop would be very dramatic in sound and vibration. Suspect your tacho is telling fibs. That's my thought too. Because it doesn't really run rough. At 1600 rpm tach reading it should be trying to jump off the airframe but it's not. 1 1
facthunter Posted July 28 Posted July 28 Too large a stagger makes no sense. When on the retarded position it will lose too much power and runs hotter. The faster the Gas burns the better. (Flame travel). Firing them at the same timing achieves this. IF a plug is not firing that cylinder runs a bit more retarded. 2 strokes can whisker plugs and that can be a transient and correct itself. Nev 1 1
facthunter Posted July 28 Posted July 28 618's have had crankshaft Issues (Break at the drive end). Don't climb out over trees or over houses. Nev 1 1
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 54 minutes ago, facthunter said: 618's have had crankshaft Issues (Break at the drive end). Don't climb out over trees or over houses. Nev 618 s have the strongest crank of all the 2 smoke Rotax . That's why they weigh more than a 582. The same crank in a 670 runs up to 135 hp.
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 2 hours ago, facthunter said: 618's have had crankshaft Issues (Break at the drive end). Don't climb out over trees or over houses. Nev That's the great thing about where I fly. I always have a farm under me if I have an engine failure. Although I would try to land on a road if suitable.
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 1 minute ago, facthunter said: The failures are on record.. Nev Where do I find the records. I found a bit about crank bearing failures.
facthunter Posted July 28 Posted July 28 (edited) Look harder (IF you really want to find out). I DON"T have any axe to grind. I was flying 2 strokes then and it was common Knowledge. The 582 quickly became the PREFERRED ENGINE in the 65 Hp range. I'm careful with all things and have never had a 2 stroke fail. There can always be a first time but the More careful I am, the More Lucky I seem to be. Nev Edited July 28 by facthunter
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 14 minutes ago, facthunter said: Look harder (IF you really want to find out). I DON"T have any axe to grind. I was flying 2 strokes then and it was common Knowledge. The 582 quickly became the PREFERRED ENGINE in the 65 Hp range. I'm careful with all things and have never had a 2 stroke fail. There can always be a first time but the More careful I am, the More Lucky I seem to be. Nev I don't really care . I just assumed you knew where the record could be found. If you google Rotax rick, the guru of Rotax, he reckons the 618 is the best of the 2 strokes if looked after correctly. He recommends running 40 to 1 . None of his rebuilds have failed and he thinks 40 to 1 is the main reason. I have oil injection but I need to add a bit of oil to the fuel too I suppose. I was terrified my Jabiru engine would explode but it ran like a Swiss watch. Read to many internet posts about how bad they were.
T510 Posted July 28 Posted July 28 There will always be people who make claims with out the evidence to back them up. The people who have the failures tell anyone who will listen, the people with no issues rarely tell anyone. Majority of the failures are typically linked to poor maintenance. I always ran 2-5% Motul 2 stroke oil as premix in my oil injected 2 strokes, give you a little bit of safety margin if the oil injection system fails 2 1
facthunter Posted July 28 Posted July 28 A bit of extra oil in the fuel is always a good idea with Pumps. Once the Engines are hot the Oil separates from the Fuel better and despite all the talk of fuel/oil ratios recent extensive dyno tests have found about 40: 1 is best power output with correct mixture adjusted in all cases. 2 stroke lubing has always been considered MARGINAL needing anti friction bearings everywhere. Normal OILS Lower the Octane by a large amount. Don't use and also TCW3 is for Outboards ONLY. Plug heat range is a bit more critical that other engines too. 2 strokes can detonate. Use high enough octane and don't use stale fuel if mixed. Ring groove Carboning is a cause of ring breakage and sudden failure. You can check that by removing the exhaust pipe. and pushing the rings slightly but the best is to take the Cylinders off and check. Pull the prop over and check how the compression feels. . Inverted motors sometimes get stuff on the Plugs Remove and scrape the Insulator with a Sharpened hairpin. Chisel point. Nev 1
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 I am running amsoil interceptor because it is considered the best oil for Rotax. And Iridium plugs cross referenced from the stock plugs..
facthunter Posted July 28 Posted July 28 Bit of a waste of money in my opinion. Insulator foullng is the Main problem, not Point wear and you have Dual ignition. Nev 1
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 7 minutes ago, facthunter said: Bit of a waste of money in my opinion. Insulator foullng is the Main problem, not Point wear and you have Dual ignition. Nev engines run nicer with iridium plugs and there is less load on the ignition itself. not to mention the extra life over stock plugs.
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 this is getting annoying. i started this thread about my mag drop and end up defending myself as usual. nev you say you have no axe to grind yet you do nothing but criticise rotax engines. if i listened to you i would not get in an aircraft powered by rotax, just too dangerous. 1
facthunter Posted July 28 Posted July 28 That's complete rubbish. You have a lot to learn and the wrong attitude to learning. Hell I've put a lot of effort into Listing things that Might be some assistance. ALL engines have Faults and idiosyncracies. What I've said about two strokes applies to all two strokes likely to be in an aeroplane I've spent a lifetime working on the B'' things and never once mentioned Rotax when flying one. Nev
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 25 minutes ago, facthunter said: That's complete rubbish. You have a lot to learn and the wrong attitude to learning. Hell I've put a lot of effort into Listing things that Might be some assistance. ALL engines have Faults and idiosyncracies. What I've said about two strokes applies to all two strokes likely to be in an aeroplane I've spent a lifetime working on the B'' things and never once mentioned Rotax when flying one. Nev so you are saying you have never had a negative thing to say about rotax engines.
facthunter Posted July 28 Posted July 28 I will say what I have learned about any Motor and none of them are perfect, especially Piston engines. A motor that can't be faulted is yet to be built. They are built by Humans. Reciprocating engines have rapid Load reversals. torsional vibrations and can fly apart with great force. Better you know about it and deal./ live with it or perhaps be FAT, DUMB and Happy with blissful Ignorance I can understand that but don't whinge IF/When you come unstuck. So far it's worked for ME. Haven't injured any person OR Damaged a Plane. I've had a LOT of failures but I didn't CAUSE any of them. Nev
BrendAn Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 10 minutes ago, facthunter said: I will say what I have learned about any Motor and none of them are perfect, especially Piston engines. A motor that can't be faulted is yet to be built. They are built by Humans. Reciprocating engines have rapid Load reversals. torsional vibrations and can fly apart with great force. Better you know about it and deal./ live with it or perhaps be FAT, DUMB and Happy with blissful Ignorance I can understand that but don't whinge IF/When you come unstuck. So far it's worked for ME. Haven't injured any person OR Damaged a Plane. I've had a LOT of failures but I didn't CAUSE any of them. Nev i agree with this post . i look after engines and rarely have a problem. and the day i stop learning is not here yet .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now