Jump to content

horsefeathers

Members
  • Posts

    368
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by horsefeathers

  1. Horsefeathers - for starters, great temperatures, which I could only dream of!! Oil temp is great also. have been very interested to know what sort of difference I would see between the speak plug probe vs screw type, so that's interesting to hear that you tried it and that they are in fact similar.I am gathering that you don't have EGT's which are a good indicator of mixtures, but nonetheless, I would be thinking that no. 4 is running a little leaner. Not sure how it works if you have a pusher installation, as per your avatar, but the change in intake for me clearly richened up no.4 specifically, so who knows...

    If you don't mind me asking, how many hours on the engine? What sort of jetting and what sort of ambient temps are you operating in?

    Hi Seb.

     

    Just to clear up some confusion, I'm flying a Jab 160 (the avatar is my old Streak Shadow, with a rotax 582).

     

    I have 300 hours on the engine (and airframe), and the last leakdown was 80/78 on all cylinders, so no probs there. I have put the Jabiru recommended jetting in about 100 hours ago (except the idle jet which from memory is a "35" instead of a "45").

     

    Ambient temps are about 20 C (I use a simple digital OAT thermometer).

     

    The new CHT probes are from Sonex, and designed for a Jab 2200 (old thick fin heads only) Sonex Web Store - AeroConversions CHT Probes (set of 2) AeroConversions CHT Probes (set of 2)

     

    About 10 engine hours ago, I added a flat aluminium plate BEHIND the oil cooler- it is attached to the shield in front of the muffler, and extends about 12 inches parallel to the oil cooler. The thinking here is to direct the oil cooler air "exhaust" down towards the firewall, and prevent/minimise it mixing with the low pressure air from the heads. I have seen an observable decrease in all CHTs of about 25 F. The original gauge (head #4) NEVER goes over 300 F now, and that figure is backed up by the new gauge. A quick and dirty installation, but after this success, I am going to try to enclose and capture that exhaust air more completely.

     

    However, that #4 CHT is annoying.

     

    Cheers

     

    Gerry

     

     

  2. Hi Guys.

     

    Been following this discussion with great interest, and would love to have your thoughts on CHTs on a 2200

     

    I recently installed a gauge with a 4 CHT readout, and all CHTs are within 5 degrees or so of each other, EXCEPT for #4.

     

    This consistently reads 35 deg F higher than the other cylinders.

     

    Cruising temps are approx 230F on 1 through 3, and 4 will be approx 275F

     

    Also, when taxying, the CHT on #4 climbs much quicker than the other heads.

     

    The probes for the new gauge sit under the head bolt closest to the exhaust valve, and the original CHT sender (on 4) is still operational, and is under the spark plug. The original and new gauge are in reasonable agreement on #4 head temps.

     

    Oil temp sit about 90 degreesC. Standard Jab ram air ducts

     

    So, my question is, is there a way of getting the CHT of #4 down to the level of the other heads?

     

     

  3. Perhaps, a system that rewards posters for the number of likes, rather than just a raw count of their posts. After all, it's a quality rating, not quantity, you're after.

     

    Some of the posters here make a lot of noise, but don't deserve the same status as (for example) facthunter.

     

    So, expand the 'like' system slightly, and tie a user's status to that.

     

     

    • Agree 1
  4. Well, here's an update following a few different strategies: simply opening up the intakes did do wonders - it dropped around 10 degrees off things and adding about a 1 inch 'fence' on the base of the duct directly in front of No. 2 dropped it a further 10ish degrees also! At this stage, 2 & 4 are my warm cylinders, whilst 1 & 3 are bordering on too cold (has this ever happened in a Jab?????)On the last run, at 20 degrees celsius ambient (ground temp), cruise temps @ 2900 were as follows:

     

    CHT's.............EGT's

     

    No 1 -108....... No 1- 664

     

    No 2-155.........No 2- 713

     

    No 3-120.........No 3- 602

     

    No 4-150.........No 4- 656

     

    Has anyone had experience with the left side being substantially higher than the right? From a duct perspective, both sides are almost identical, so it's got me scratching my head for sure. I am waiting on a Manometer, so will check the pressure differentials, but going on 1 & 3, the cowl outlet situation looks just fine...

     

    I have actually tried the 'carby tilt' technique, with nil effect, so at this stage jetting is my next curiosity. It seems I have older jets, with a 255 main and possibly 276 needle?

     

    From the EGT's, I gather that 2 & 4 may not be getting as much mixture....

     

    Any thoughts??

    Hi Seb.

    Do you have any before and after pictures of your modification?

     

     

  5. Latest email from RAA includes this from Technical

     

    Message from Technical

     

    Lithium Ion Phosphate Batteries – to use or not to use?

     

    An article in next months’ Sport Pilot magazine covers the issue of whether or not to use Lithium Ion batteries in light aircraft powered by Rotax or Jabiru engines. Both manufactures advise against the use of these batteries and that aircraft owners should only being going in accordance with the requirements detailed in the manufactures handbook for their specific aircraft.

     

    I am concerned that Tech Manager does not know the difference between Lithium ION and Lithium IRON Phosphate batteries. Following manufacturers handbook is obviously the correct thing to do, but posting confusing tech advice is less than helpful

     

     

    • Agree 3
  6. Try this BP document about Mogas - its a bit surprising re the octane level over time - it actually increases.

     

    The problem is with the loss of light components, and BP recommends adding fresh fuel to petrol more than a week old, to refresh these lost light components.

     

    http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp-country/en_au/media/fuel-news/petrol-life-vehicle-tanks.pdf

     

    In summary it says:

     

    Loss of light components – impact on octane

     

    The light components in petrol are lost first as the petrol sits in the fuel tanks. These

     

    components provide valuable octane benefits under high revving conditions such as

     

    cold start acceleration and the loss of these components can result in detonation and

     

    pre ignition at high speed resulting in piston damage.

     

    The remaining components that have not evaporated are high octane and octane can

     

    actually increase with time but this octane is not available for high revving

     

    conditions.

     

     

    • Informative 1
  7. Hi Mark.

     

    I owned and flew a Streak Shadow (28-1456) until 6 or so months ago.

     

    First thing. It's one of the easiest planes to fly, and is perfect for low time pilots.

     

    There is an active British forum for Shadows here http://forums.bmaa.org/default.aspx?f=45&r=x

     

    They will have answers to all your questions, (except about your Jabiru installation)

     

    If you want any info (pilots handbook, maintenance tips, etc), just let me know, and I'll see what I can dig up.

     

    There are a few things you should be aware of that are issues common with Shadows, (boom tube wear, horizontal stabilizer reinforcement), but NOTHING that there is no relatively simple solution for.

     

    PM me with your phone number if you'd like a chat.

     

    Cheers

     

    Gerry

     

     

  8. Well not new arrivals, 2nd generation (have to speak good English) and not so well paid, it's just security but I agree indeed good to see them having work. The obvious concern is with the situation that happened at Sharm el-Sheikh of course, some allegiances always come first.

    Bit of uninformed biased innuendo is always better than facts, aren't they.

     

    Ahhh GG, will you get over your oh so obvious prejudices please? Your comments are just plain nasty. For an avowed Christian, you seem to have a lot of problems following the basic tenets of your religion.

     

    One of the problems with Sharm el-Sheikh of course, was the use of the ADE-651 bomb detector, which unfortunately, is useless at detecting explosives....

     

    Manufactured by those good ol' boy terrorists in the good ol' US of A. There are no batteries in the unit and it consists of a swivelling aerial mounted to a hinge on a hand-grip. The device contains nothing but the type of anti-theft tag used to prevent stealing in high street stores and critics have likened it to a glorified dowsing rod, and costs $40,000. As the company owner says, "the ADE 651 does exactly what it's designed to. It makes money." https://theintercept.com/2015/11/23/this-fake-bomb-detector-is-blamed-for-hundreds-of-deaths-its-still-in-use/

     

    These guys pray to that God in the bank, the Almighty Dollar.

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...