Jump to content

Keith Page

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,400

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Keith Page

  1. Keith Page
    Yes those preflight inspections go on my flight log along with the fuel measures, times and landings.(Fuel management needs a safety net as it is done in flight planning procedure as well hence fuel required is calculated twice.) Better to be sure. Only the services and maintenance/repairs get on the log book. Regards, KP
  2. Keith Page
    Looks like other people do not know what is in the Tech. Manual as they would not be asking for information outside the content. Regards, KP.
  3. Keith Page
    Are those requests in the Tech. or Opps. Manuals? If the format for requests not there, how can one comply? To me it is making up rules at a whim. Regards, KP
  4. Keith Page
    Yes Bill you are on to it. Sorry about harping -- that is the exact reason why I am against leaving three directors on the board with a new constitution which is not correct.. They have runs on the board for making rules on the run, that is just one demonstration. Regards, KP
  5. Keith Page
    As I see it there is no requirement -- as nothing regarding paperwork work requests is not mentioned in the Tech. Manual. If it is not a directive in the Tech. Manual so why? To me it is regulations on the run. How can you comply with something if it not in the Tech. Manual or Opps. Manual. If it is not they can make any rule up. Regards KP.
  6. Keith Page
    and that is what we being told to vote. YES to.. KP.
  7. Keith Page
    That is well pointed out, Thank you Ian. The issue of -- don't worry about it we will fix it on the run, in the mean time the organisation is being guided by only three directors and they will be the ones designing the correction. Yes fix it before the journey starts. KP
  8. Keith Page
    Bit of a correction here "ego" should read "rego",, I-pad spell check/correct plus I should read 100% before posting. KP.
  9. Keith Page
    OK! *RAA is a member organisation. What not the TechManager go off and do something to fix the problem. (He knows the rules/regulations.) Instead a letter is sent and says your ego is cancelled end of story. These fellows are supposed to be batting for us not playing police people. Now would it be good if one gets, you can not fly this way however we need to XYZ and that will get you going in no time, but it is always this big fight, never a quiet yarn just ends up a yelling match. Regards, KP.
  10. Keith Page
    Query To Raa CEO. Regards KP.
  11. Keith Page
    I think you need to visit #150 in another thread, if you take the points from this board member, looks like they did not tell you all the truth. Regards, KP.
  12. Keith Page
    I have been away doing some work hence a lot of time has not been utilised checking the happenings on the forum. However I have put a lot of thought to the issues and this post from another board member solidifies my thoughts on certain issues. So this proves a lot of members are aware this "Yes" is a manipulation. Remember there are some gag restrictions on board members however one member has broken ranks. We have been told by Don that the board is rock solid on "Yes", ????????. To me it looks like Don has been vested the duty by the board to push the "Yes" vote in doing so Don has enlisted the help of a few buddies to push "Yes" as well. Another point has been mentioned to me - by having a smaller board that will get rid of the dead wood from the board. Now? One meaning of "Dead wood" we all know however the other meaning, Is it a disguise for those who are not partaking in the party lines which is a "yes" in this case. Looks like the smoke screen is falling down. Regards, KP.
  13. Keith Page
    Well said 01rmb..Your #246 covered a lot of points which need addressing. Fishla from #212 did the president and CEO address these points? There is a term which is used quite often used, "Lying by the fact of omission". This could cover a lot of these roving seminars. Regards, KP
  14. Keith Page
    Thank you Ian... Good on you.. You will get good help.. Regards, KP.
  15. Keith Page
    Of course they will have their argument stacked to say they are making the greatest decision in the world. They would not be running about saying they have made a very bad decision. Still does not get away from the fact that the constitution needs alteration. We do not start a journey with falts in our plan. We start with a correct plan. Regards, KP.
  16. Keith Page
    I thought I would revisit this thread. I just wonder if there is something in this paid director issue? For me there are some concealed issues, we just have to identify them. Regards, KP
  17. Keith Page
    For my personal interpretation and in a nut shell, what you are advocating with the above post:- Vote "Yes" for the new constitution. The above view has a complete disregard for my suspicions, views and interpretations -- that is not going to happen. So it is a, "No" for me. What amazes me is the intensity of the push for the yes vote. My interpretation -- when there is such a large push there are hidden agendas. Regards, KP
  18. Keith Page
    Eloquent = appropriate expression. KP
  19. Keith Page
    I am stuck here. pmccarthy. For my way of thinking this is what all the current yelling is about, put in simplistic terms this is amending on the run. In my view something as important as a constitution should be correct at the beginning of the journey. Like navigation ya don't start ya journey knowing full well the navigation is incorrect. Yes you do the amending on the way that is after you have done your checks and the plan is not going to work. Called correction. Regards,KP
  20. Keith Page
    I have your posts beginning to end and also I have read Don's posts beginning to end. Regarding your posts, Inference covers then nicely. Regards, KP
  21. Keith Page
    and that is why they want to get rid of regional representatives. Regards, KP.
  22. Keith Page
    Hello David, proves a point you and Don are buddies singing off the same song sheet. If nong is thinking along those lines there will be others with the same view. You, Don and who ever else can defend it however those people will still maintain their interpretation. See you are defending the new constitution to the hilt. Regards, KP
  23. Keith Page
    With regards to Admin's upper post. I have questions as well. Reference from another thread:- "Query to RAA CEO". nong has contributed to this so eloquently. Go to the thread and read #5. Go and have a read it is so wonderful, I am quite suspicious of all this drum beating saying how this new constitution is so wonderful. Have a read of nong's view. Regards, KP.
  24. Keith Page
    Have you worked it out yet Don? KP.
  25. Keith Page
    I do see a big problem here with regional representatives. How are we going to get the board member do as requested instead of off doing what they want to do? Here is my argument for regional representation, the locals will understand what is going on in the region. The non resident will have to rely on written reports and we all know how they get twisted in whoevers favour. There needs to be a process to bring them to heal and take a year of process to get compliance. As what you are advocating all that is in the ideal world. I can see big loop holes big enough to drive a buss through. The ideas are not stringent enough to get compliance. Remember the is yelling about governance. Regards, KP.
×
×
  • Create New...