Jump to content

winsor68

Members
  • Posts

    3,578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Posts posted by winsor68

  1. I'd be interested in a short kit.

     

    Regarding Aeroflyte...they call it AeroFlight...as they must not have gotten the name in the purchase...but...they already produce Brolga sailplane and Hustler mk3 kits...and I am told the next one will be a control line. The bloke who is behind it is called Brian Simpson and he owns Perth RC Models and Hobbies. It's early days yet but lets hope they keep the dream alive. You can find a lot of the plans and files on facebook here--->Log in to Facebook | Facebook

     

     

  2. I've actually got two of the HK Drifters, the second one bought because I needed parts...dumb thumb syndrome...they fly really well, nice little modelthe plans I have are for 72 inch span so in the old money, 6 foot wingspan...that will make it about twice the size of the HK version

    first thing to buy will be the 1 inch aluminium tube for the 'fuse', followed by balsa and ply...

     

    as always the really difficult part will be making/sourcing a suitable canopy - twill not be easy

     

    BP

    I reckon 100 inch would be better but would definitely be interested in a set of plans either way.

     

     

  3. Because the people 30 years ago who were buying were 30 years younger than pilots starting out today and were being trained in aircraft that were similar in structure performance and even then the numbers made and sold were small and filling a market that was new. Now none of those things exist

    I reckon it still exists. You just have to scratch a little harder. I reckon the current situation didn't come about randomly out of the blue. There was a lot of marketing involved in selling the idea.
  4. Price and the pilots out there are the reasons they are not being built.If your average new pilot is a newly retired person with a passion who goes to an RAAus school and sees only 912 powered fully enclosed very fast aircraft and is trained on them what is he/she going to think RAAus aircraft are today?And given the materials cost in a plane like that today is north of $15k with any sort of margin in it for a manufacturer ... and that with a two stroke engine that that new entrants just will not fly.

     

    I’d love to do a kit for my single seat trike design but it’s just not viable to do it.

    So how come there was a margin in it 30 years ago?

     

     

  5. I'd also go for Qld Blue Couch - which apparently is not actually a couch, nor does it come from Qld, but whatever ... I like the low maintenance and the way it spreads to cover bald patches and is soft enough to have a low rolling resistance for a plane.If you want to reduce the sowing cost for any grass type, as long as it is a variety that spreads readily and you're happy to be a little patient, I would avoid using seed altogether. As mentioned above, birds will probably eat 90% of the seed you sow, so that's a big cost in itself.

    If you buy about 1% of the coverage you need in Qld Blue turf, you can break the turf apart and during the wet part of your year, plant small pieces at about 300mm grid spacing. Just spike a hole in wet ground, place a small clump of turf and press the soil back around it. In a month or so, the small pieces will have started to produce runners and in about twelve months the patches should be all closed up.

    You should be able to get Qld Blue Couch for free off someone. We have it in our yard.

     

     

  6. It depends on which 150, they seem to vary from 440kg all the way to over 500.150E

    The 1965 Cessna 150E saw only the addition of new seats, although the standard empty weight went up 40 lb (18 kg) that year to 1,010 lb (460 kg). The "E" model saw production increase to 1637 aircraft.[6]

    It also seems to depend on whose account you read. I doubt there are too many below much below 500kgs.
  7. Of course it is. I have a 445kg BEW, but registered 2 seats. Nothing at all wrong with that concept so long as the 600kg TOW limit is adhered to. So full tanks & me, or half fuel and one of my rugrats. How's that any different to a 152 operated under RAAus?

    50 kgs is a lot of weight difference.
  8. From the Ra-Aus tech team....

     

    "as long as the aircraft is not operated over the MTOW of 600kg as permitted by RAAus it is permissible to have aircraft that could normally operate at a higher weigh on the register. In this case due to the MTOW of the Cesnna 152 it would be limited to a single pilot operation with fuel only. Any other operation would be outside the requirements of the Ops/ Tech and CAO"

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...