boingk Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Hey there guys, just a quick question as I've got varying answers on this in the past. What I'd like to ask is what restrictions (if any) are placed on a PPL flying an RA-registered craft? Obviously you need an RA conversion and cannot exceed 10,000ft in altitude, but other than that can you fly it much like you'd fly a GA craft as regards controlled airspace etc? Cheers - boingk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 You have to be a paid up member and have some form of pilot certificate. Controlled airspace is confined to some aerodromes during training. No commercial activity (bar training), no IFR, NVFR or aerobatics. I ( informed pax only at a one time) Confirm this before acting fully on it There is a website. All the contact details are on the second page of the magazine." Sport Pilot".. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirsty Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 My understanding is if the pilot has a ppl and ra cert AND the ra reg aircraft is properly equipped eg transponder and certified engine then the pilot can exercise the privileges of his ppl including cta. Is that not right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 My understanding is if the pilot has a ppl and ra cert AND the ra reg aircraft is properly equipped eg transponder and certified engine then the pilot can exercise the privileges of his ppl including cta. Is that not right? Yes that's correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boingk Posted April 26, 2012 Author Share Posted April 26, 2012 Thankg guys, and yes Nev I'm aware of training limitations. However the training area I have learnt in at YGLB is in no way 'controlled airspace' - I may have had limitations on distance and height etc but it was Class G airspace. Otherwise I completely agree with you in regards to no commercial activity, IFR etc. My understanding is if the pilot has a ppl and ra cert AND the ra reg aircraft is properly equipped eg transponder and certified engine then the pilot can exercise the privileges of his ppl including cta. See, thats what I thought. It sure makes sense anyway. Cheers - boingk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 There's some restrictions about flying over a populous area, ( height and gliding distance etc). A lot of this has been reviewed and I don't think the general direction is to relax regs ( more the opposite). So check and be sure. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boingk Posted April 26, 2012 Author Share Posted April 26, 2012 No worries, and yes I am well versed on the minimum height over populated areas - I often have to start descent over Goulburn town before joining circuit at YGLB and will not descend below 1500ft AGL before clearing the town and adjacent freeway. I believe actual the wording is something like 'not below 1000ft AGL and able to glide clear of any structure'. Thanks again guys - boingk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 I believe that RAA aircraft are now more restricted than GA. Steve Bell was able to give concessions but he is not there and the ability to grant them was removed, anyhow, There is currently some concern that it will restrict GA if some interpretations are applied. IF you are an AOPA member ring them and by all means contact RAAus OPs manager. I can't give a definative answer. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAIRVTW Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 My understanding is if the pilot has a ppl and ra cert AND the ra reg aircraft is properly equipped eg transponder and certified engine then the pilot can exercise the privileges of his ppl including cta. Is that not right? Spot on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Moore Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 and certified engine Does this mean the aircraft (or at leasts it's engine) must be maintained by an LAME to enter CTA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camel Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 The word is approved engine not certified. Aircraft that can enter CTA Must have approved engine and this includes Rotax 2 strokes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Isaac Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Be careful guys, it is not any RA Aus registered aircraft properly equipped; it is restricted to 24, 25 or 28 (I think) registered aircraft, certainly not 10 and 19 Registered. Camel is correct, you can even build and register a 2 stroke Drifter in the VH experimental category and do aeros and fly anywhere your PPL allows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Crezzi Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Be careful guys, it is not any RA Aus registered aircraft properly equipped; it is restricted to 24, 25 or 28 (I think) registered aircraft, certainly not 10 and 19 Registered. 95.32 also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camel Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Be careful guys, it is not any RA Aus registered aircraft properly equipped; it is restricted to 24, 25 or 28 (I think) registered aircraft, certainly not 10 and 19 Registered.Camel is correct, you can even build and register a 2 stroke Drifter in the VH experimental category and do aeros and fly anywhere your PPL allows. Approval from RAA was given to individual cases applying for exemption and approved, several 19 Rego homebuilds have exemptions. Apparently it has stopped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank marriott Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 For CTA also a RAD43 & 47 certificate [accuracy of altimiter & transponder] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boingk Posted April 27, 2012 Author Share Posted April 27, 2012 Cheers guys, and yeah the beastie I'm looking at has a Continental A65 fitted so no worries there. It does not, however, currently have a transponder - how big of a deal would it be to have it fitted with one? Cheers - boingk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Moore Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Hey Boingk, do you mind me asking what aircraft your looking at? As for transponders, not a huge deal to fit but a bit exy. Looking at around $3000 and up when it is done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Andys@coffs Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 If you search these forums for transponders and ADSB you'll find a bunch of info that may make you more informed in the transponder buying activity.....For example, anyone buying a transponder today would be well advised to enquire if it can handle the mode S extended squitter pulses. Not all trasponders can which then infers time for a new one or an expensive upgrade if and when ADSB gets the nod. The Microair transponder for example required an upgrade to cope with the ADSB interogation transmissions. If you were to look down that path a new one, or one that is known to have the mod would be required IMHO or the 2nd hand pricing needs to reflect that you have more $$ to spend. Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 At this point in time an older one wouldn't be worth considersation. Prices keep coming down and weight and current drain, also. It has to meet all the latest requirements. You need shielding in fabric aircraft. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Moore Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 If it is fitted with an A65 it might also be worth noting there might not be a charging system installed. So something that uses very little electrical juice will be important Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Isaac Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Hey Louis, Does your Auster have a charging system on the engine or wing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Moore Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I am lucky enough to have a genny hooked up to the O-235. Although if I could get my hands on a wind generator would probably fit it just for nostalgia! How about you David? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Isaac Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 No electrics Louis, But my LAME has found me an original wing mounted generator that I am about to fit, as I am about to fit a proper radio rather than using the Aviation handset sitting in a pouch with a battery pack that came with the aircraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boingk Posted April 27, 2012 Author Share Posted April 27, 2012 Thanks for the info guys, and no there isn't a charging system installed on the craft. The VHF draws power from a 7Ah gell-cell behind the seat which periodically needs recharging, or I'd assume can be kept topped up via a simple 12v solar panel on the rear shelf. One craft I'm looking at is a Carden GY-201 Minicab currently registered 28-0825, previously registered VH-ULH. Total time 900 hours with engine (A65-8) rebuilt 200 hours ago. Cheers - boingk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 There are rebuilds and there are rebuilds. The old Continentals are economical and reliable and quite lovely really, but some have been around for a while now. If it has only done 900 hours that's good but you should check the condition of the engine as far as sludge, camshaft lobes , valve stems (exhausts) and cylinder bores for corrosion . The sump can easily be removed on the later ones and cleaned and I think the early ones are similar. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now