Jump to content

jackc

Members
  • Posts

    2,301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

2 Followers

Information

  • Aircraft
    Aeropup/Thruster T300/J-230D
  • Location
    Rockhampton
  • Country
    Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

9,086 profile views

jackc's Achievements

Well-known member

Well-known member (3/3)

  1. I alway thought its design was over the top, with high production costs, but for what? It reflects some print media persons ego? Something like a yearly BHP Shareholders Report?
  2. Provided they don’t use the ‘System’ for personal gain?
  3. In that case, I have to ask is Mr Monck’s position in RAAus a conflict of interest, in any way?
  4. If that was this recent case? IF I was them, I would be crowing the fact I paid my own way, and be proud of it But I think Mr Monk IS an aircraft dealer, IF I am not mistaken?
  5. Me, being a member of https://www.eaa.org/eaa for some 5 years, have seen a wealth of information on MOSAIC for the U.S. ALL on their WEB Site, No need to go to Oshkosh for that? I have to wonder what benefits were, for RAAus officials to attend? RAAus could have done better by looking closer at FAA FAR Part103 Ultralight sector, which would be going back to our roots, not trying to move closer to GA?
  6. No wonder it costs so much to print? Just look at how it’s bound? The GSM of the pages? I think back to ‘ Wheels’ magazine years ago. No swimming pools, no movie stars? Just a basic good reading motor rag? Printed in an economical way, that worked. Today, we complain of costs, because we over do media products, then use that as an excise to go Digital? Well RAAus can do that, but I want a reduction in membership fees?
  7. Maybe I could throw in the RAA Oz junket to Oshkosh😁😁 Now heading for bomb shelter 👍
  8. There may be a Boeing design fault, but there is a crew fault….NO Flight Engineer with a seperate control panel……
  9. Surely, since the Aircraft was in take off configuration at full thrust, the computer management system, would not allow a manual switch fuel cutoff to work, those switches would be locked out in the control system, because of the aircraft configuration at the time. The only exception could be IF a motor blew up and a heap of parameters showing same, then the fuel should automatically shut off, anyway? I smell a big rat, in all of this……..
  10. IF the aircraft had a Flight Engineer, the fuel switches would have been on his control panel and his responsibility. Pilots are for flying the aircraft, one of a Flight Engineers job is to keep the plane running. Just my useless opinion……..
  11. May have helped having a Flight Engineer on crew?
  12. Pilots of these modern technologically complex aircraft are only going for the ride, anything complex goes wrong, very little chance of saving the aircraft from disaster 🤢
  13. Every time I see this stuff, I think of an aircraft with no numbers, a person with no training, no instructor, a plane in a big paddock, fully fueled, 100 hours YouTube training, spend half a day doing bunny hops. insurance? What that? After lunch…….just send it 😁😁
  14. All too complex specs for me, I would rather a Lister Diesel 🤩
  15. When it comes to Aviation, I have never seen such a disorganised bureaucracy amongst so many organisations, with their fingers in the aviation regulatory pie. There are restrictions and conflicting rules and the people administering them, it’s just a hopeless mess, much of it that Joe average pilot and aircraft owner have little idea, nor can understand.
×
×
  • Create New...