Jump to content

djpacro

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,945

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Everything posted by djpacro

  1. djpacro
    Nope, nil watchers and only the closest airplanes could be seen from the IAC building.
  2. djpacro
    50+ Pitts at Oshkosh last year in amongst the general public area - the area was packed especially on the Saturday and I didn't see anyone touching an aeroplane but many sitting very close in what little shade a Pitts provides.
  3. djpacro
    No clearance required to taxi from parking area to the runup bays. Fairly prominent signs alert you to where you need a clearance. So, taxi call at the runup bay.
  4. djpacro
    Some good data related to that here: http://www.eaa1000.av.org/fltrpts/lanc360/hq.htm Agreed, and Chris Furse was up there too.
  5. djpacro
    My small sample observations is that CASA people in the field don't care much about small cameras temporarily mounted internally yet the question often comes up and I have seen nothing in writing about it. If I get a verbal answer from CASA I always follow up with an email to confirm - sometimes I get nil response which tells me something. When/if they do put something in writing it logically can't conflict with EFB mounting per that CAAP. Perhaps one day they will see how the USA does stuff but I'm not holding mybreath.
  6. djpacro
    Nope, that CAAP is not about cameras but the rules about mods are very general so anything that applies to EFB mounting would logically apply to camera mounting.Still looking for a reference, such as https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net351/f/_assets/main/rules/1998casr/021/021c08.pdf Para 4.3.5 for example.
  7. djpacro
    Where's your reference for that?
  8. djpacro
    Suggest you read the bit about mounting EFBs in the CAAP then we might discuss. It says something about suction mounts and velcro etc not being airworthy so those EFBs must be stowed during takeoff and landing etc. It goes on to say that EFBs mounted to the aircraft structure require airworthiness approval. It doesn't say that you can mount sonething to structure with suction mounts and velcro etc without getting airworthiness approval does it? What constitutes structure? If mounted somewhere that is not structure is it exempt from having airworthiness approval? When we agree on what CASA says about EFBs we can extend that guidance to cameras and end up with nothing practical.
  9. djpacro
    You could put your money under your mattress .....
  10. djpacro
    I think you will find that it does actually meet the normal category spin recovery requirements. Although the FAA allowed that exemption because of the chute they did not have to show compliance however I saw that another country insisted on seeing the spin test results for certification there. I know a number of people who own Cirri (is that correct) and I agree with some of the prior comments - works very well for two of my friends.
  11. djpacro
    Temora.
  12. djpacro
    I am aware of at least one spin accident in a Tiger in the UK where the pilot walked away however I am also aware of quite a few local stall/spin accidents which were fatal. Happened upon this enlightening NZ report just now https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiXksOY4ZPKAhWkGKYKHXiyDCUQFghEMAc&url=https://www.caa.govt.nz/Accidents_and_Incidents/Accident_Reports/ZK-BAR_Fatal.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGd5QFYUCc97WH5LkipHJ--1thbAQ&sig2=y1s6IHvrVyBKhrlc3GyAPQ&bvm=bv.110151844,d.dGY - see page 13 for a brief summary of Tiger accidents there. Or go to https://www.caa.govt.nz/safety_info/fatal_accident_reports.htm for report 06/4477 on 23 May 2011.
  13. djpacro
    If you go to the FAA website you will see the current Mission https://www.faa.gov/about/mission/ This explains the aftermath of the ValueJet accident http://edition.cnn.com/US/9606/18/faa.valujet/ U.S. Transportation Secretary Federico Pena.
  14. djpacro
    Not true since the ValueJet crash.
  15. djpacro
    What size are approach plates?
  16. djpacro
    There are absolutely no rules on EFBs which apply to private operations (apart from the general rules applying to change to an aircraft per Part 21).
  17. djpacro
    Just trying to keep you out of jail if ramp checked. Don't put it on Utube as CASA loves viewing - two of them inspected a friend's aeroplane after seeing a video from it.
  18. djpacro
    Shouldn't have any trouble getting it approved then ..... https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net351/f/_assets/main/rules/1998casr/023/023c01.pdf
  19. djpacro
    you must read that CAAP on EFBs.
  20. djpacro
    I just got a Garmin Virb XE, seems to work very well but hasn't been in an airplane yet. Probably mount it on my headset rather than pay for engineering approval to mount it on the airplane.
  21. djpacro
    Nothing bigger than the Mini for me in a Pitts.
  22. djpacro
    The Savage Cub also has foldable wings - the owner if this one kept it in a trailer at the local airport https://www.raa.asn.au/storage/sport-pilot-6-nov2011.pdf
  23. djpacro
    Always interesting to compare Australia's with USA's e.g. "The ATSB has reported that the average fatal accident rate for all general aviation activity in Australia was 12.5 per million hours flown in 2011. This is comparable to the average general aviation fatal accident rate in the United States which was 12.4 per million hours flown in 2011."
  24. djpacro
    Sorry, but I couldn't see how the statement "For myself OzRunways works out less expensive than buying ERSA and Maps, also you don't need mobile coverage once you have downloaded required data." I see now that you also use OzRunways for tracking which others have noted uses mobile phone signals for that function.
  25. djpacro
    Irrelevant to tracking discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...