Jump to content

Keenaviator

Members
  • Posts

    658
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Keenaviator

  1. Didnt they loose their prototype in spin testing , your right you don't hear much from them , quiet achievers .

    They did Mike but the video showed that it recovered itself as Dave got out through the stopped propeller blades. Apparently he only had time for the chute to pop open before he landed hard. The GA 8 landed harder. Laurie

     

     

    • Informative 1
  2. Just bit the bullet and ordered a Jabiru scimitar prop for my UL 450. Seems a bit pricey but in reality not that much dearer than the Patroney I put on the Starlet when you include prop, hub, back and front plates and spinner (painted Jab white). And it's pre assembled and approved.

     

    I've been chasing a slightly high egt on no. 4 cylinder and have tried 4 different props: Jab 60 x 42 - 3300 rpm @ 75 knots, Jab 60 x 44 - rpm a bit lower on climb but not very smooth so I didn't persist with it, Sweetapple 58 x 44 - 3400 rpm @ 75 knots and Sensenich 60 x 46 - 3200 rpm @ 75 knots). I've fitted a new stepped needle, 045 main jet and 290 needle jet but no. 3 is still a bit over 700 at WOT (flowing 27 litres per hour). After fitting the new prop I'll check the egt at WOT at 75 knots.

     

    The next step is to update the induction set up - mine is an early 2200a with the induction manifold cast into the sump and induction tubes coming out of this at 90 degrees.

     

    Laurie

     

     

  3. I too have no doubt that the Rotax 912, most Lycomings and Continentals are more reliable than Jabiru engines but none are as reliable as turbines. It's all relative.

     

    Jabiru engines were developed out of necessity when there were much lower weight limits for our aircraft and no four stroke alternatives with the required power to weight ratio available. The 912 may have been available but too heavy for the early weight limits.

     

    No doubt Rod and his mates are the type of blokes who don't mind a challenge and went for it after KFM let them down. We seem to be overlooking the fact that Jabiru have pretty humble beginnings (compared to Rotax who have a massive company behind them - Bombadier who not only produce engines for aircraft but jetskis, snow mobiles, lots of motorbikes.....). If Rod and co at Jabiru had 600 kg to design to back in the '90's they probably wouldn't have bothered developing an engine. Imagine, the 170 with a 912s, they'd have to work well together. Anyway, the Jabiru engine manufacting industry is established and very successfull and has allowed many people to get into the air in a variety of aircraft. I'm on my second Jabiru powered aircraft, the first being Corby Starlet 28-3381 (no longer owned by me but still going great and much loved by its current owner) and my current UL 450.

     

    For me, there is a certain amount of national pride in Jabiru's achievements. Hearing the incessant and often hasty, uncalled for put downs by some, is in a way offensive. You've got to smile and think 'what the heck' when some of the most vocal critics of Jabiru have proudly displayed in their avatars that the aircraft they fly is powered by an engine with a 300 hour TBO. So far the only real engine failures I have experienced have been in aircraft powered by these.

     

    I understand that Jabiru engines are a work in progress. So too are all other aircraft engines although Jabiry may be a bit more intensive in their requirement for vigilance. I also understand that flying is dangerous and there is no such thing as an infallible engine, aircraft or pilot. There are no guarantees on a safe return from any flight - that's why we should perform a careful risk assessment prior to any flight (or drive to the airstrip....).

     

    Laurie

     

     

    • Like 3
    • Agree 13
    • Informative 1
    • Winner 2
  4. Yes, although in John's case, he accidentally pushed against the rudder pedal while leaning back to the rear fire wall to change tanks on the fuel selector. It fuel selector is normally piped forward to the front cockpit. But in his aircraft, the builder decided that he didn't want fuel lines in the cockpit so he located the fuel selector onto the rear fire wall. Probably cost John his life .

    Yes, that was the distraction. I'm sure we are all a bit lucky to be here and able to critique other people's incidents. Laurie

     

     

    • Agree 1
  5. My new (old) 2200A with its small starter motor would have been a real challenge to start in cooler conditions. But I have fitted a 'cold start kit' which makes starting a breeze. With this kit you don't have to achieve the normally high cranking rpm to get the ignition system to produce a spark. Laurie.

     

     

    • Agree 1
  6. I get plenty of carby ice during warm up on the ground but none as yet during flight with the Jab. Used to get lots in flight with the 0200 in the C150 and that was disconcerting.

     

    Laurie

     

     

  7. I've owned and flown a GT400 and very much enjoyed it. I've also flown a GT500 and felt it was better, 2 seats, more power, more inertia.

     

    A GT400 is good to solo in - not that you have any choice :)

     

    Laurie

     

     

  8. After several days of very ordinary weather, I managed to squeeze in a nice hour or so after work today - from Latrobe Valley to Glen Maggie the West Sale to catch up with Daryl, Jill and Darren who were making tracks due to the low temperatures. The lighting from the setting sun was quite dramatic on the way back to YLTV from YWSL. Laurie. 1937448_950285164997338_4654246009013013980_n.jpg.47a69826711fe651b48cd3e296d7f3dd.jpg

     

    1937448_950285171664004_7235540187864814978_n.jpg.3bded0106797c810cf2f2ae48efeea1a.jpg

     

    10351821_950285168330671_9081164701277533983_n.jpg.4354bf71f0717bdb1920dd683a0c43be.jpg

     

     

    • Like 1
  9. so I'm assuming that avgas remains usable unless it has been contaminated with water ?I'm also assuming that there is no degradation of the avgas itself ?

    mike

    That's what you originally asked wasn't it Mike? Before the thread side slipped.....

    My understanding is that avgas lasts and lasts and lasts since it is made out of petrol and lead - no aromatics or chemicals that can evaporate off leaving low octane stuff. I know years ago I was given a 200 litre drum of avgas (130) athat was a couple of years old and it seemed to work fine. Laurie

     

    BTW, the unleaded I use is Shell 95.

     

     

    • Helpful 1
×
×
  • Create New...