turboplanner
-
Posts
23,762 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
152
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Store
Aircraft
Resources
Tutorials
Articles
Classifieds
Movies
Books
Community Map
Quizzes
Videos Directory
Everything posted by turboplanner
-
Focus on how many are in RAA, many basic aircraft are popular in other countries. We have to focus on the ones that are legal to fly here.
-
No point in silly trolling.
-
No standards, no oversight, make your own decisions, at your own risk...............doesn't sound like the CASA I know.
-
Flying in Australia legally, under 95.10 regulation?
-
RAA aircraft are only allowed to fly if they can achieve the designated stall speed range in order that landing collisions will result in a lower level of damage/injuries. In this case the structure isn't going to be redesigned, tested and rebuilt to GA standards and stall speeds, so there's no rabbit hole there.
-
It's not a liability argument, its very unlikely that an aircraft which has been grounded on safety grounds will be given a tick by another Administrator if they are given the original reasons yet here we've seen irrelevant documents posted suggesting it can be done.
-
There's a lot of skipping around going on here; either a refused RAA Aircraft CAN be flown in SAAA or another category or it can't. The owner said 21 hours ago(these times will change as time goes on): "I believe the 95-10 Wing Loading" is not applicable to VH Experimental. Am I wrong?" 21 hours a document was posted: SAAA Controlled Document IppGen008-001 headed Convert RAAS amateur - built to VH Experimental. This was a general advice information paper which did not refer to cases such as where RAA has refused to approve/register and aicraft on safety grounds. There was no mention that an aircraft had been refused on safety grounds, no suggestion that this would be advised to SAAA/CASA. At 19 hours ago the owner said the advice which was being posted "does what is needed" Your advice, your responsibility. If CASA rejects this point blank, what are you going to tell the owner?
-
Well the owner should be told that rather than be given a different story.
-
So are you saying that if you have an aircraft rejected on the grounds of safety by Recreational Aviation Australia Ltd, you just take it to SAAA and they will register it?
-
...and impediment to smooth flight. This can be corrected by light ..................
-
....vibrations into the structural section of.......
-
I think you've summed things up very well. What's going on certainly doesn't have much to do with RAA documentation.
-
It might explain a subject very well, but when you are talking about an aircraft which has been refused registration for, as far as I remember, over a decade then it's best for the person involved to be contacting the organization responsible for registration rather than a third party who may not have an "Amendmment", "Sunset Clause" "Proviso" or any number of items the outside party might have missed in his opinion.
-
Not necessarily, but certainly it's not safe to provide advice from third party documents.
-
You're quoting an SAAA document there.
-
No it was more based on the distances, however RAA has stuck with aircraft ownership and maintenance from the AUF days so an owner pays for any mistakes in the aircraft specification or design, and pays the full cost of maintanance, annuals etc. where by a hiring regime/aircraft on the flight line you may be paying for only 100th of those costs.
-
.......eliminate air bubbles, overcome gravity and fill the gascolator for an uneventful flight over long ........................................
-
No, tried RAA as a low cost alternative, but when I ran the spreadsheets found it was more expensive than GA, but my interest is in cross country.
-
,,,,,,write a letter to the government telling them how good NDIS is and recommending one more person to be added; that's not much cost to all the taxpayers; about two cents a session. It just heppened that there was an election on and the Greens read the Bluey story in the Guardian, and ran full page ads about Albo ripping off the taxpayers with "free services". It wasn't so much that the story came out or that Albo, like every good socialist was quite happy to go along with this, but the Greens headline which read XXXXXXX Albo!. Albo flew [avref] into ......................
-
DooMaw - building a STOL
turboplanner replied to Head in the clouds's topic in Aircraft Building and Design Discussion
Yes, still interested in the progress. -
......pop up clinic, and had to wait 17 hours until it popped up. Ron's mood was not good and he abused the Doctor. This wasn't a good start because since Albo had been tightening the screws, the Doc had lost his BMW, his beach house, his annual holiday to Bali, and his two nurses, one of which was ..................
-
......has aileronitis, and certainly not as bad as the does Cappy picked up in the back streets of Bombay. NES readers will remember that Cappy's ..........................
-
Depends whether it's a recall or not. If it is and Jabiru are paying for the changeover, that's quite normal for Australia, and should be commended.
-
.........ailerons, and even though I don't believe in ailerons, they do give me ......
-
I'm tied up working on something else at the moment, but best not to look for reasons an policies from any of us, but from the original sources. You realise they are not going to waste too much time on social media opinions.
