Jump to content

tillmanr

First Class Member
  • Posts

    483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by tillmanr

  1. A bit of both.The"right" bit is that " . . . board members are elected on a regional basis". The right postcode is the primary qualification. If you were Dick Smith but your postcode was outside the particular region, you could not even be considered for election.

     

    The wrong bit, if I understand you correctly, is that "the association has board members to represent voting members". I've interpreted that to mean that they are there to represent the region they were elected from. If that's what you meant then that is completely incorrect. All decisions made by individual Board Members must be to the benefit of the entire association as a whole. It would be unconstitutional and even illegal to act to the benefit of your region against the best interests of RAAus as a whole. RAAus is a body corporate and the Board must act in the best interests of the Association not any particular group of members.

     

    That may surprise some people.

     

    If you simply meant that Board members are elected to look after the interest of ALL members (not just the 15% who voted) then you are of course correct.

     

    This is a bit theoretical because it is difficult for me to imagine how the Board could favour one group of members over another. I'd be very interested if anyone could give me an example of how that might happen.

     

    Part of the problem here is that we are currently using the Association form of incorporation which is more suited to a small club with a limited geographical spread of membership and certainly not well suited to a national body. The Club model works quite well at the Hunter Recreational Flying Club that I am a member of. However, because RAAus operates outside the state/territory of incorporation (the A.C.T.) we are accountable to the Aust Securities and Investments Commission (the other ASIC) as well as the A.C.T. Dept. of Justice and its Office for the regulation of incorporated associations.

     

    Being a member with a postcode as the primary qualification for election to the Board is not necessarily going to result in having the most competent Board. If we had a choice between a pilot who had legal qualifications, an MBA and extensive Board experience versus a pilot who was enthusiastic enough to put him/her self up for election but had no qualifications or experience that would equip them well to operate at Board level then, other things equal, we should probably vote for the former. However, if the former was from Sydney and the latter was from Katherine in the NT the former could not be even considered if the "seat" was for the NT and RAAus would most likely be the poorer for it.

     

    The regional thing at the moment is also quite undemocratic in that we have a great disparity in the "one vote one value" principle.

     

    The regional representation model was adopted in a time before cheap landline calls interstate, widespread use of emails, Skype, etc. and may have had some value then. It just no longer makes any sense.

     

    In my view, we would be better off to have every candidate for the Board elected based on their qualifications, experience and declared intent rather than, in the first instance, their postcode. In the new Constitution that is exactly how Board Members will be elected.

     

    Don

    Don, my impetus was not that a board member should act contrary to the benefit of the association but be aware of the thoughts and wishes of members. I feel that the administration is busy with day to day running of the show not collecting thoughts and feelings of the membership. That is the role of our elected board in my opinion. I could be wrong.

     

     

  2. David, I can only agree with what you are saying and will discuss with the Board and the CEO to see what we can do. Perhaps what we need is to publish an email address that covers the entire Board rather than one individual member as the Board should act as one entity not as 13 independents.

    Don I believe that the association has board members to represent voting members. These board members are elected on a regional basis, I assume to have a voice for the members in those regions.

     

    If I cannot approach my regional representative of the board we might as well have no regional basis to the board elections but only a universal (nation wide) election to the board.

     

    Am I right or wrong?

     

     

  3. I have been chasing the the correct item when in the USA but they appear to be a mythical tool. I have been to maybe a dozen auto supplies and once we overcome my accent they are then unable to find one in their catalogues. I see them referred to by high performance auto engine types but no easy retail source in USA or Aus.

     

     

  4. Early this year I visited Pima at Tucson and the military boneyard where the guide pointed out that F16s were being converted to targets. With recent developments worldwide the suggestion(good oil) is that some are being refurbished for active duty.

     

     

  5. Don't just go for the younger flyers. I recently attended a 3 day engine maintenance course and had to teach a 60 something person how to read a micrometer as well as set a torque wrench. Said person had co built two kit aircraft during the last 12 months. We need a minimum skill level to be acquired and this may cost money but we need to show as a group we are working for safety in preparing our aircraft.

     

     

    • Agree 2
    • Informative 1
  6. Why oh why do people who would seemingly never intend to attend sit back and throw arrows. They criticise, ridicule and throw up red herrings without contributing to the general cause of flying.

     

    If you want to go, do it with planning. Otherwise crawl onto another site and waste their time. We want to be constructive not destructive.

     

    End of rant.

     

     

    • Agree 2
  7. I didn't have time to attend any workshops but agree that the catering was overextended. However if you can advise the SAAA how to cater for an audience that can vary from about 20 if it rains to more than 1000 if it is sunny I am sure your advice would be appreciated. As Narromine has about 3000 locals the turnout of this order is hard to predict and then interest caterers to have vast perishables in the fridge just in case. I thought it was a success.

     

     

    • Agree 3
  8. The camping is allowed BUT during the display the parked aircraft are within the safety area. After the display finishes you are allowed to return to your aircraft. CASA rules not the SAAA. Don't blame the messenger please. Good turnout for a "working day" and great weather today.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...