FlyBoy1960

The news conference held by the police said that it was a "mid-sized dog" If a dog of this sized freaked out during the flight anything is possible

ChatGPT Says. They should have used Chat GPT to design the rocket. They wouldnt have had this problem and would now be orbiting the moon.

Same owners for about 10 years unless it was sold in the past 6 months ?

If the reliability is any good its a winner. BUT if its the same as past products it needs to be validated for reliability

https://www.ja-gps.com.au/RAM-Mounts/?sort=bestselling I just noticed online that Johnny Appleseed GPS which is a major supplier of a lot of things in Brisbane is closing after 25 years in business at the end of the month. They have some fantastic specials at the moment including RAM mounts which we use in aircraft a lot. The pricing is really good and I pass it on for information only, you might pick yourself up a real bargain. No I don't work for them and have no affiliation with them.

this was the development version of the aircraft that has gone on to become the first certified electric aircraft in the world, the Pipistrel ALPHA Electro. The 2nd photo you have above is a military variant which is not electric so I am not sure why the photo is there of that aircraft ?

They work great, i think i still have a new one laying around somewhere. Let me look.

I was just reading about the no-fly zone on the Internet and thought I would jump off to flight radar and have a look. Look at the flight tracking for this Etihad flight from Moscow to Abu Dhabi. It's transponder is going on and off by the look of the tracking and it is actually in around airspace. This was up-to-date as of 13:30 this afternoon. Strange ?

Cheaper to use a 24V battery.

a report on the plane crash will be prepared for the coroner and a Recreational Aircraft Australia investigation is also under way

🔄 Can carbon fibre composites be recycled? When carbon fibre is mixed with resin (typically epoxy), it forms a thermoset composite, which is very difficult to recycle using conventional methods. The challenge lies in the chemical structure of the resin: Thermoset resins, once cured, do not melt or soften with heat. This makes separating the carbon fibres from the resin extremely difficult without damaging the fibres. ♻️ Recycling methods (and limitations) There are a few recycling approaches under research or limited industrial use: Pyrolysis (heat-based) The composite is heated in an oxygen-free environment to burn off the resin. This leaves behind carbon fibre, but the process can damage or weaken the fibres. The result is often shorter, lower-quality fibres not suitable for structural aerospace use. Solvolysis (chemical-based) Solvents and supercritical fluids break down the resin. This can preserve longer, higher-quality fibres, but the process is complex, expensive, and not widely adopted yet. Mechanical grinding The composite is ground into filler material. This doesn’t recover usable fibres—just filler material for concrete or plastic products. 🛑 Key limitations Recycled fibres are typically not certified for structural aerospace applications. The cost of recycling often outweighs the value of the recovered material. Most end-of-life carbon fibre parts still end up in landfill or incineration, though this is slowly changing. 🌱 In development Researchers and manufacturers are working on: Recyclable resins (e.g. thermoplastics or reversible thermosets) Cleaner separation techniques Circular economy models for aviation and automotive industries But as of now, recycling carbon fibre composites remains difficult, energy-intensive, and limited in output quality.

Nice looking plane !

They said "it failed to take off"

Or, the school as a history of accidents and claims possibly brought about by different training standards and the insurers need to cover their risk. Quite often you are paying a very high percentage of the aircraft cost in excess. A $100,000 aircraft would normally have an excess of between $3000 - $5000, a $200,000 aircraft could double this

the RA-Aus insurance (try and get a copy out of the head office is impossible) only ensures third-party property and person damage. An example would be if you crashed and killed somebody. If it could be proven that that you were completely compliant with the regulations, your aircraft was up-to-date with all maintenance requirements and there was no other excuse for them not to provide coverage then, there will be an amount paid to your passengers family. Likewise, if you ran into a power line in the process of a completely legal flight (which is unlikely if you hit a power line) then they would cover the cost of getting the powerline repaired. From what I was told there have only ever been 3 successful claims because there is always a way to avoid fulfilling the insurace coverage.