SGM

Are there other devices being actively considered by RAAus members?

Maybe Brumby 600 aka J544 (ok ok I looked up the rego)

still rising

Sad. In the middle of the photo is the white top of someone's fuselage, a vertical and part of a black prop. To the left is a flying boat. I had a chat to this owner when I visited December, (at that stage he was putting the finishing touches on the restoration and preparing for a first flight - the Tweed River is not too far away) In the background, on the other side of the North-South runway, are two hanger buildings also well underwater.

I saw this posted yesterday https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-12/old-bar-airfield-tiny-airstrip-with-big-aviation-history/100796410 I've added it to the list of obscure airfields to visit. I have an older copy of the Pilots Touring Guide and have seen Country Airstrips .. is anyone aware of a book with more human-interest and historical content on smaller Australian airfields? Steve

There has been some early comments on this forum about Angel Flight, which I volunteer for, so I thought I would post these videos (with permission) Why??.. 1. By raising your awareness you may be able to mention it to someone you know who needs it (typically regional Australians commuting to city hospitals); 2. You may be in a position to volunteer yourself; or 3. You may be in a position to make a tax-deductible donation

The $1584 is for $51k hull AND $1m Combined Single Limit of liability

On the topic of insurance our renewal was due a couple of weeks ago, and I don't mined sharing my experience. We had $50k hull through PSB (Insurance House), for which the renewal was $1921 with a $1500 excess. I got an alternative quote via Bill Owen/Agile for $51k (which was bizarrely cheaper than $50k) with $1000 excess. This was $1221. This included the "new for old" bolt on. In the end we decided on increased coverage over last year, specifically the $1m Limit of Liability, largely to protect a passenger (most likely spouse/family member) in the event that any (ongoing) medical expenses are required as a result of an accident and they exceed the RAAus amount . This cost us $1584, so significantly less than both last year and the renewal. The note that came with Bill Owen quote is below. Obviously insurance is a highly personal perception of risk likelihood and consequence, so I don't suggest what we decided appropriate for everyone... but I get consistent free advice from this forum so I am happy to share. -------- Liability Limit: We also strongly recommend a minimum limit of liability as part of your aircraft insurance as the liability attached to the RAAus membership is limited. Also the biggest risk with aircraft ownership is not the loss of the hull, but the legal liability you take on as the owner, which can amount to millions of dollars in the event of a claim that involves property damage / bodily injury / death to either passengers or third party (i.e. people / property outside of the aircraft). Additionally, if the aircraft is owned by an individual and the Combined Single Limit of liability is exceeded in the event of a claim, everything personally owned is potentially exposed to claimants, particularly the family home. Of course, the decision is yours, however we do strongly recommend you consider a Combined Single Limit as part of your policy

Thanks.. We did buy a regular PLB, which I hope goes unused. I also hope that in the event of an emergency my mobile phone network traces, Av-plan logs, "find my phone" app, mode-C records and the NAIPS-filed flight plan all prove useful in narrowing down a location. I probably shouldn't worry as I suspect statistically an "incident" in near proximity to an airfield is probably more likely. BTW still haven't worked out which public websites receive our NAIPS flight plan information ie RAAus scheduled arrivals/departures at regional airfields.

RossK, Your aircraft looks a bit like mine! Here was my recent flight near Lakes Entrance... an opportunity to see a rig I previous was involved with (years ago), and also to ask my son how long he thought "90 mile beach" was.. ("don't know") Steve

Perhaps.. but I guess that's really just the same as the "Find My" apple/android app (since I always have my phone with me). If noone has investigated this before I might contact NAIPS and see who they share filed flight plan data with (they must have a public API for the scheduled arrivals/departures pages of airports). I also suprises me that CASA will approve Avplan and OzRunways, but not require approved parties to share live flight data share data with each other. It would be safer if we could all see the planes with the "other EFBs", see conflicting NAIPS flight plans and even have a feed the mode-C bounces that must be available to Webtrak. If we ever want commercial drones to work, then sharing this this seperately siloed data will be critical.

Looking for some advice on how friends/family can track thy progress of an RAAus registered aircraft, with mode c transponder, flying cross-country, under a NAIPS registered flight plan.. My (limited) understanding is 1. Avplan (and presumably Ozrunways) will show your progress to others but only to those the same software (shame they can't share), and of course the aircraft has to be in mobile coverage for GPS coords to make it up to the server, they don't offer the data publically; 2. Flightaware and Flightradar24 will not show anything live because they rely predomainately on ADS-B (which I do not have). They will not record arrival and departs from their airports, even though NAIPS knows. 3. Webtrak https://webtrak.emsbk.com/ would show a flight with code 1200, but only if you are in close proximity to one the (mostly) capital city airports 4. Some airports have an arrivals/departs webpage which seems to be a RPT filter on NAIPS data? The reason for confusion is when my aircraft was registered under CASA, ie VH, it was trackable on Flightaware... and I am sure I have seen a record of an RAAus flight there once, but I can not seem to rerproduce it. SImilarly when I flew to Mildura once I was suprised that my planned inbound flight appeared on an arrivals webpage. Perhaps there is some "trick" to having your NAIPS flight plan data made public? On seperate note, in Avplan, I have recently noticed a number of RAAus aircraft with the Callsign Rxxxx where xxxx is their 4-digit RAAus registration. These are ADS-B equiped (where as I am not). Is it preferred Avplan or other noclamature to have the map-visible "callsign" as Rxxxx? Steve

If the above concept is ok, and there are not extra approvals required or misunderstandings about Point Cook, the only shoreline I can't get to as RAAus pilot would be the Mordialloc area due to Moorabbins 3NM radius.

Turbo, Did you mean continuing the Melb Coastal VFR route until the BOM tower then heading south from there? I was trying to fly the entire bay shoreline if I could. SGM

As RPC and unaccustomed to flying over restricted areas, I thought I would check my understanding. If flying the below route from NE to SW.. - fly anytime except Tue, Thur, Sun at 1.15pm-1.45pm AEDT - radio call on 126.2 at 10NM to advise overflying, and maybe again as entering R330A (which is about 4nm from YMPC - Point Cook) - fly not above 2000 until ALTS (infact 2000 is the westbound guidance on this VFR route) - fly at 2500 (and not above) within R330A and R330B (given trainee circuits are probably being conducted at 1000) - radio call 126.2 when directly above YMPC - Point Cook - keep a sharp lookout given danger area and no ADSB (which is the recommendation) - Don't land (as I don't have permission), keep beacon and landing lights on - Did I miss anything? (slightly confused by the comment "status of MIL CTR/CTA are not included" as this is a MIL field) --------

Jerry..That's the current image from Google Maps - I noticed it on a flight simultor the other day.

Could it be this?

As per person who started the thread - let's call it to a close here - happy fathers day and safe aviating.

To be honest, I think it's a very impressive edition. I was concerned for a while (after Mark's untimely departure) that it may disappear altogether... but it's back, and I think he would be proud. Anyone else have thoughts?

BTW - on the topic of flying, I made some polite enquiries today... it seems some Victorian aviators may be operating under some older guidance (eg https://mfs.com.au/staying-safe-covid-19 - example only, this company is not presently flying although others are). Perhaps this explains the ~10 or so training flights I could see today. Even though I am vacinated and would be of no risk to anyone with a solo flight, perhaps it's the optics of if that prevent me. Hang in there everyone!

The observation is that multiple Victorian training aircraft are in inflight in Victoria, right now, including the one from a major university (an organsiation that you would expect would take a conservative view). Is there a "recreational flying" guidance / exemption / "understanding" that anyone has come across.