Jump to content

Blackhawk

Members
  • Posts

    233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Blackhawk

  1. Hi Ian, I know exactly what you are talking about and I too have seen many good deigned engines over the past 10 years dissappear into oblivion. Not only unusual designs but many engines based on conventional engine thinking. Every time I've searched for an engine to use and find one that will fulfill our needs, it fails to materialise and the search then starts again. This is the sole reason for us to get involved in developing these engines. We have collaberated with a number of engineers to bring this concept forward and hope we will not fall into the same obis as the others. All original designs may have their failings initally but subsequent improvements by other imaginative thinkers can turn an average idea into an excellent one. It wouldn't matter if you designed the most perfect of whatever, there would always be those that will ridicule and nock the whatever, for the sake of seeing their name in print or to voice their opinion, when in fact they haven't got a clue what their talking about. These people are usually the ones who eat three or more serves at a smorgasbord then complain the meal was rubbish. And I know you are not one of these type of people, so your comments are always taken onboard. At least we are prepaired to put our necks on the chopping block no matter what the end results may bring. Greame
  2. What a well worded and true discription. I had these types before that are happy to criticise beyond belief and never achieve anything in their lifetime for themselves. I wonder what comments he would have made if he was around with the Wright Bros. Graeme
  3. Geoff, The photo is the prototype petrol version, not a diesel. We've decided to develope the diesel version instead of the Petrol. Flying "out in the wind"................ YES! Graeme
  4. The engine doesn't have a crank shaft, the pistons are driven by a cam. Hence the term Rotary. They are air cooled, but that might change before production and we can easily add valves for a 4 stroke configuration because of the simple way the engine is designed. They are all common rail EFI. Graeme
  5. We'll definately look into that. Graeme
  6. Yes, it's a MULTI fuel engine. I don't know about Tawney Port though. Graeme
  7. Hi Lyle, I thought you said you were going to to buy a Jabaru. There's no gearbox or radiator and at the moment I can't give you any information on the exhaust weight. Graeme
  8. That's all the infromation we are releasing at the moment so we can guage the vialability for production. Especially in this current economical climate. Our web site was corrupted with MALWARE and is being rebuilt so I will let you know when it is back up and running. Graeme
  9. In late 2009 we will begin production of three different size, High Torque Multi-fuel Radial Piston engines which will be Air-cooled and Fuel Injected. There are very few engine choices in the 65HP to 120HP range at the moment and Diesel engines in particular, are virtually non existent for Recreational Aviation use. We have Patents for the engines already in place for some countries with more to be submitted in early 2009 to give us full world wide protection. Below are the specifications for the three engine designs (all Diesel, but can be configured to run on UL petrol at slightly less HP). They will have inbuilt gear ratios and drive configurations. All engines have a maximum 3000rpm and are designed to have the following drive options; (1) Direct drive (for fixed wing and Gyro's) for all three capacity engines (2) Direct drive with counter rotating shafts (for helicopters, fixed wing and Gyro's) for all three capacity engines. (3) Direct drive with 500rpm on front output of engine and 3000rpm on the rear (for Helicopters only) for the 1600cc and 2000cc engines. The specifications are as follows; CAPICITY ............HORSEPOWER.............. DIAMETER ............WEIGHT 1200cc .....................70HP ............................510mm ................<50kg 1600cc .....................95HP ............................610mm ................<65kg 2000cc .....................120HP ..........................710mm .................<80kg Production cost estimates put these engines at around 15 to 20% less than currently available petrol engines (Rotax in particular) of similar horsepower and considering a diesel has 26% more power than a petrol engine of the same displacement, this makes our Radial Piston Diesel a very viable alternative. We are looking for 'serious' comments from members regarding these engines. We will be relying on your feedback so that we can determine the viability for us to proceed with the production and general consensus that they will be readily accepted throughout the aviation community. I have attached a photo of the Petrol version proof of concept prototype engine. Looking forward to your comments. Regards Graeme
  10. Interested to know if anyone here is tinkering with 1 or 2 seat VTOL-PAV. Surely with our aussie 'can do' attitude there must be ideas floating around that collectively would get us up on the world leader platform. The American's have been trying for decades without much success; so if anyone is interested, lets get something started. Blackhawk
  11. Sucked in! You must admit it's a great fake. Blackhawk.
  12. This would have to be the most skilled pilot on the planet, and the luckiest. http://www.chilloutzone.de/files/08102703.html Blackhawk
  13. Hi Farri, (Frank) I would like to thank you for the information on Bill Starke and his Sea Eagle amphibian. I contacted his wife and had long discussions with her and I am pleased to tell you we now have the design and manufacturing rights to Bills Sea Eagle and we intend to put it into production as a kit. Even though bill flew the Sea Eagle before he passed away, he never got to see it progress to the next step. Our plan is to take his dream to the next step and start production. Bill's wife, Rose will not take part in any of the production, but will benifit from royalties with thesale of the kits. She is very keen to see Bill's ultimate dream take flight, hopefully across the world. I've attached some photo's of the Sea Eagle to show the members what Bill had achieved, as there were very few details about it.
  14. Hi Paul, Would you know how I could contact the pilot that had the mishap with the power lines in his CT. My email is [email protected] and phone 0741294212. If you could pass my contacts to him, it would be appreciated. Regards Graeme
  15. Hi Paul, Would you know how I could contact the pilot that had the mishap with the power lines in his CT. My email is [email protected] and phone 0741294212. If you could pass my contacts to him, it would be appreciated. Regards Graeme
  16. Hi slartibartfast, Sorry to hear about the CT pilot and his mishap. I hope it doesn't put him off flying again. Would you mind seeing if he could contact me at [email protected] or 07 41294212. Regards Graeme
  17. This would have to be the closest thing to flying like Bird! BBC NEWS | UK | Pilot completes jetpack challenge Graeme
  18. Very nice amphibian. At that price with shipping and GST it would put it up around the AU$160000 mark. OUCH! They either want to make a quick fortune or go to the wall very quickly. It would be out of the reach for the large majority of pilots. Graeme
  19. There was an amphibian prototype being built in north Qd. a couple of years ago called "SEA EAGLE". Does anyone know what happened to it. I suppose like a lot of good designs, it too, has fallen of the drawing board. Graeme
  20. Thanks Brent, I wouldn't mind contacting him for some info. Graeme
  21. Yen, I lived in Gladstone for nearly 20 years up til 5 years ago. There was a cessna float plane that used to land in the marina then taxi over to the boat ramp at the Yacht Club. It was quite a regular visitor. Graeme
  22. Hi Tony, I would have thought that if a power boat license was required as well, to operate an Amphibian/Float plane you naturally do the test in a power boat, not a plane. It is then up to you to operate that aircraft in the confines of the boating regulations until you leave the water. Seems straight forward to me. I'm really thinking of building a full composite Osprey2 which will be under the 615kg limit and powered with a 120hp engine. Graeme
  23. This has probably been asked before but; " With all the waterways, lakes, dams, river systems and oceans in and around Australia, Why aren't pilots going for a dual purpose aircraft like amphibians rather than being confined to land based aircraft". At least with amphibians you have two choices of landing surface and a vast array of exploration possibilities throughout our great country. Imagine, a group of amphibians flying to some inland lake/s in Qld for a week of camping and Barra fishing. I would like to have an amphibian aircraft in the next 2 years and do a lot of sight seeing/camping trips around Aus and in particular the lakes in the mountains of Tasmania and throw a line for some trout. It is amazing that we have a far better climate than Canada (sunshine especially), but unlike them, we have very few amphibians. I'd like to hear your comments. Graeme
  24. Hi Ben, I think there was a High Scool in Bundaberg Qld that did that, building a Jabiru and with help from Jabiru which is based at Bundaberg. I'm not 100%, but I do remember something about it a couple of years ago. Graeme
  25. Thanks Carl, I have emailed them for information (in French). A language translator program comes in handy from time to time. Graeme
×
×
  • Create New...