Jump to content

Strings explain the bernoulli theory


Recommended Posts

is it a demonstration of Bernoulli's theory or a demonstration of flow separation over the wing commonly called a stalled situation, and how the air moves over the wing in a spin manoeuvre?

 

The best example of Bernoulli's theory in an aircraft would be the carby venturi or a airflow Vacuum venturi system seen on older aircraft.

 

and let me get some popcorn..

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I`m not going to argue with those who say Bernoulli`s principal is a myth. I know I taught it and none of my students fell out of the sky ( so to speak ) I never have either,for that matter!

 

There`s a hell of a lot of pilots who were taught that the camber of the wing determines the speed of the airflow over the top surface of the wing, thereby, decreasing static pressure and creating lift! As far as the pilot is concerned, does it realy matter whether Bernoulli`s principal is a myth or not? what the pilot realy needs to know most is how to fly the aircraft.

 

Frank.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't stop people flying Farri, but I prefer more realistic explanations that apply everywhere. Like if air goes in a curved path there has to be higher pressure on the outside and lower on the inside, but if you say "static pressure plus dynamic pressure is a constant' the interview person will give you a tick... Nev

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably Bernoulli. That would only be a guess on my part, Farri How does one tell unless we do a survey. It is a long time since everyone taught from one reference, like AP 1732A and there are a lot of books put out by flying instructors, that have their own way of explaining things. Most would have one or two points of contention... Nev

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coanda effect is more accurate than Bernoulli theory - and is just newtons balance of forces

 

The shape of the wing makes air deflect downwards. Air has weight and this change in direction creates a force in the opposite direction = lift

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call it an aerodynamic reaction. PUSH doesn't do it for me, LIFT has been around for a while and it is a simple and explanatory word of how the WEIGHT (mass x "G" force) is opposed. and the aircraft LIFTed into the air. Nev

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton seemed to have a neat and tidy explanation , although his laws don't explain why the top of a wing needs the shape it has,I prefer to call it magic , and leave at that

Matty

I seem to remember my balsa wood gliders flew pretty well with just a thin flat sheet for a wing. The spitfire wing is a very thin section and worked a treat, too. .074_stirrer.gif.5dad7b21c959cf11ea13e4267b2e9bc0.gif

 

Kaz

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's almost no curve at all to the top of the wing on a F18, or similar fighter aircraft.

so how does bernoulli relate to that airfoil?

As for it not being important ,it depends on the person, I like to have an understanding of what's happening, some mightn't care and thats fine , but I always thought what was taught in ground school (bernoulli)just didn't add up,,,,,

 

matty

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I venture to suggest the correct answer is "all of the above".

 

Bernoulli works best at lower air speeds hence the wings of slow moving aircraft generally have wings with a significantly thicker leading edge. As the aircraft's Cruising speed increases more effect is gained from COANDA because the force on the underside of the wing increases with it as does the equal and opposite reaction (lift).

 

Hence your favourite big kero burner has slats on the leading edge and flaps the size of your hangar door to give it the Bernoulli result at takeoff speed then retracts them as it accelerates and COANDA takes over.

 

That's my theory, anyway.

 

Kaz

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to one of the NASA articles, lift is a complex thing involving both Bernoulli and Newton's laws. I think the example of a symmetrical wing as proof that Bernoulli has nothing to do with lift, is not accurate. Regardless of which way up a symmetrical wing is flying, the AoA necessary makes the distance over the top longer than that underneath.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...