Jump to content

BurnieM

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    375

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by BurnieM

  1. BurnieM
    Camden ground height 230 ft AMSL The Oaks ground height 879 ft AMSL In order to climb above The Oaks circuit height (lets say 1500 ft AGL at The Oaks) 879 + 1500 = 2379 ft AMSL Height to climb from Camden to above The Oaks circuit - 2379 - 230 = 2149 ft to climb 6.8 NM from Camden reference point to The Oaks. Lets subtract 1 NM for The Oaks circuit - 6.8 - 1 = 5.8 NM Departing upwind 24 at 100 Kt you have 3.5 minutes to climb 2149 ft (or 4.4 minutes at 80kt)
  2. BurnieM
    Departing upwind Camden 24 goes almost exactly over the The Oaks as does long final for 06 Removing The Oaks (THK) reporting point probably does not change a lot.
  3. BurnieM
    When suggesting options you have to be careful that one of the options IS NOT 'shut down The Oaks'. It seems to me that the relationship between Hobart anad Hobart Cambridge is similar with a common CTAF. How does this work ? Can anybody comment ?
  4. BurnieM
    Probably The Oaks traffic needs to use the same CTAF as Camden. But then does The Oaks traffic make uncontrolled calls or is there a pseudo semi-controlled calls from/to Camden and what format does this take and what control does Camden have over The Oaks movements ? As it is I understand that Camden puts limits on the number of aircraft allowed to be in the circuit at Camden.
  5. BurnieM
    Not saying there is not a real Camden/The Oaks comms issue. Just saying that this mid-air collision is not the best example to drive action. Or maybe it is. A loud and well known incident could maybe drive extra education and training. It is just logically comms was only one factor and the reason for lack of comms was not lack of knowledge in this incident.
  6. BurnieM
    Both of the Cessna pilots knew about the Camden and The Oaks comms requirements and yet did not perform them (Oaks comms). At least one of the Cessna pilots had flown in this area many times. From a distance this looks like a fatigue/workload overload rather than a straight comms issue.
  7. BurnieM
    Has the report been issued for this collision yet ? Comms was definitely an issue but both the examiner and pilot being tested were aware of The Oaks. The examiner was a Shell Harbour local. I believe the Cessna was at 1300 (Camden circuit height) and then climbed into the Jabiru at 1900 (The Oaks circuit height).
  8. BurnieM
    Decided to delete as this is more of a rabbit hole than ASIC ...
  9. BurnieM
    These lawyers appear to be admiting that their client, his girlfriend, failed in her legal obligation to report her finance to CASA. We all have it but rarely are people prosecuted for it. I will not comment on the ethical issues with believing he was so dangerous he might kill himself and yet taking limited action to stop him. Yes, RAAus has big liability here but .....
  10. BurnieM
    Zero information in the boards 'statement'. Why bother making it (apart from ongoing pressure from members).
  11. BurnieM
    What year did Rotax fix this problem ? ie if we have engine made after x then we can relax
  12. BurnieM
    I always replace the whole coax length even if the work takes significant time. 20 years of corrossion but leaving the last 10% does not make a lot of sense to me.
  13. BurnieM
    https://www.coronerscourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/COR%202022%20005430%20Form%2037-Finding%20into%20Death%20Following%20Inquest_Signed.pdf
  14. BurnieM
    Note the first person to stop him was a passenger who was not aware of what an ASIC was but could definitely identify a shotgun. Any id card is only a very small part of a security system with the major failures here being; - lack of regular fence patrols and - lack of security patrols on the apron While we keep pretending that all you need is an expensive id card and occassional council rangers this will continue to happen.
  15. BurnieM
    How do you know there is nothing to be learned unless you do a preliminary onsite investigation of all aviation incidents ? Not taking about a team of people for multiple months, just 1 guy onsite for 24 hours. Yes this also costs. If you are the CEO of a government safety organisation that is underfunded why are you not being very loud ?
  16. BurnieM
    When you bought your Harley Davidson did you ask your neighbours if it was ok first ? When you decided to park 5 x B doubles on your rural block did you ask your neighbours if it was ok first ? When you took a job that required you to start your car/bike/truck at 4am did you ask your neighbours if it was ok first ? You did not ask because it is allowed to do these things. I believe in not pissing off your neighbours but we all have a right to enjoyment of our own property and in rural areas this enjoyment can (legally) be wide ranging. Its a fine line guys.
  17. BurnieM
    We do not know what the attitudes are (on both sides). We do know that it is rural land. We do know that there are tree and powerline restrictions. Most people would not fly over somebody elses house if they believed there were other options. There may be another option that involves moving a powerline. Will both parties contribute to the cost of this ? How about we let the parties actually involved discuss it without further comment here.
  18. BurnieM
    Most likely it is a Rotax 912ULS. This is a 100hp, 4 cyclinder, 1400cc carburated engine. There are thousands of these engines flying. They are very reliable.
  19. BurnieM
    Planes normally take off into the wind to reduce the length of runway required. Very few pilots would take off with a tail wind more than about 10 knots.
  20. BurnieM
    Just did it online today. Did about 3 hours of reading, references in the online notes and about 40 minutes for the exam. Out of 50 questions only about half a dozen actual maintenance questions and the rest about the rules. You need to know the name of the FAA advisory maintenance circular but dont bother reading it. I do not think they actually see it, it just appears on your membership record, in my case 2 minutes after the email saying I passed.
  21. BurnieM
    Daily commuting would still probably be legal. The flexibilty of rural areas allows many activities without council approval.
  22. BurnieM
    Short answer; yes he can fly below 500 feet over your house while landing on his property. Both of you have a right to enjoyment of your property. Both of you must be realistic in the actual, as opposed to perceived, risk of any activaty. If there are trees and power lines he may be restricted in the approach path he can follow. Perhaps there are options here but I would be careful to not attempt to aggressively persuade him to perform any actions he might consider dangerous. If he is landing once a week in daylight hours in a rural area I would consider this a low impact activity.
  23. BurnieM
    The PPL needs to be an RAAus member and do a 5 hour-ish RPC conversion. A GA BFR counts for both but a RAAus BFR only counts for RAAus.
  24. BurnieM
    I'm certified and an L1 too. Online does not really teach you a lot. A practical engine specific course would be better.
  25. BurnieM
    But do they ? 10,000 ga pilots to manage on what they say is an already limited budget.
×
×
  • Create New...