motzartmerv

Yawnnn... Happy to correct you once again aldo.

Yea that's not correct. There are several schools ( raa) based in cta.

It's the Seinfeld thread:)

If you have a raw prawn problem, I would reckon its operator error. You need to apply the prawns to a significant source of heat to exite the molecules and "cook" them. Im sure its in the manual somewhere..

Was the cause found in the investigation? I cant see it there. So when a cause IS NOT found, lets just start by seeing if we can blame the pilot. You sure you dont work for this company? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jxqlf_mrCso

Stopping on takeoff, in spec? ...We differ in opinion there..:)

Affirmative. :)

Haha. True, although, im trying to lead by example...

We would be more than happy to have him. But its a bit tacky recommending yourself...lol

I spoke to ops yesterday, the RAA are replying to CASA's latest draft and we are expecting something mid week. Ops were confident CASA has relaxed their grip "slightly". I think we are in good hands, staff and the board are handling the issue well I think.

I posted a list in this thread somewhere.. Wasnt comprehensive, but had 4 or 5, that I found quite easily.

Big difference Brent. History is a good teacher.

I think the truce will be here in a few days:)

No no jet. I claimed 10% of the through bolts failures. Only one resulted in an actual in flight failure. Anything else I can help you with?

Yea, it swings both ways alright.. It looks like you already have "price" your willing to pay. There are a couple in that " bracket". Theres plenty of schools around up your way that will do a good job. But you may have to pay a realistic price.

Deborah. ( or Barry or Steve) If you would like me and others to take your comments seriously, and not as some sort of sly dig, perhaps start using real numbers. " as many incident reports I've lodged" ? How many is that exActly? Why would you feel the need to answer a question with a statement like that? What relevance does it have? Yes, I hve submitted several "defect" reports regarding some powe plants. What relevance does that have to you and how many accidents you " claim" to have witnessed? I'm a little lost to be honest. Sometimes your posts seem credible and worthy of a detailed response . Others seem to have been written by a child who has hacked daddy's password on his computer. EzCtly how many people use your account to post here? And try answering with alpha numerical figure generally accepted indicating a number, rather thn a sly dig at me and my operation that has stupidly ( in the past) used the aircraft that is the basis of this thread.

Oh yea? So you have had ONE crash? So your saying you watched a few crashes on TV? Interesting. Youtube has a fair few prangs for your viewing pleasure, wont make you or anyone else an expert though. Just out of curiosity, Exactly how many accidents have you personally witnessed?

Where do you hang out? Seeing " a number " of accidents, remind me not to fly into your airfield..

Yea, it hurt.

Yea, thats a scientific explanation and comparison.

Sorry keith, we shouldnt take the p!ss. You obviously have real concerns and your right to bring them up here. Perhaps if you gave us some real info we could be more helpful.

Yes, he was flying in a manner that caused me concerns. No regard for physics, time dilation, or Einstein's special theory of relativity. This blatant disregard for the laws of the universe must be stamped out immediately!!!!

I saw a UFO last night. I didnt get a pic, but believe me, it was real!!!

I think there's a reg that says you HAvE to check the controls for free correct movement immediatly before flight.

Always 98 octane.