Love to fly Posted February 23 Posted February 23 "People are not understanding what they are hearing." Yep. Definitely applies to some. 🤷♂️ And some seem to have read news reports and be basing their comments on these. The Coroner's Findings are readily available, reattached here, but... COR 2022 005430 Form 37-Finding into Death Following Inquest_Signed.pdfFetching info...
jackc Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 On 22/02/2025 at 9:24 AM, Love to fly said: The Coroner made a referral to the DPP. It's stated in his report. He didn't make an instruction to the DPP because this isn't something a Coroner does. 🤦♂️ Expand But there ARE battle plans being made by organisations who know more than us. Given existing imposed legal costs, money has to be found, that people don’t have. Because the actions of some will invalidate any insurance policies, being paid out. Regardless of DPP actions, some people will suffer major loss, then comes civil action possibilities, too. Either way, it’s a sad day for RAAus……. 1
facthunter Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Coronial Inquests are NOT places where people should be, or have to be, using Lawyers Nev 1
jackc Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 On 23/02/2025 at 4:59 AM, facthunter said: Coronial Inquests are NOT places where people should be, or have to be, using Lawyers Nev Expand There is never any fairness or honesty in any part of the legal system in Australia. It’s all about money and how much it costs. Human Beings, behaving at their finest………
facthunter Posted February 23 Posted February 23 You won't achieve Justice often and perhaps not even the proper application of the LAW. The Richest Lawyers work for the CROOKS. Nev 1 1
Love to fly Posted February 23 Posted February 23 On 23/02/2025 at 4:59 AM, facthunter said: Coronial Inquests are NOT places where people should be, or have to be, using Lawyers Nev Expand Guessing this memo got missed. RAAUS definitely had lawyers there. 1
jackc Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 On 23/02/2025 at 5:55 AM, Love to fly said: Guessing this memo got missed. RAAUS definitely had lawyers there. Expand The bill so far is $400,000 and climbing 🤢
turboplanner Posted February 23 Posted February 23 On 23/02/2025 at 6:43 AM, jackc said: The bill so far is $400,000 and climbing 🤢 Expand That doesn't mean a thing.
jackc Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 On 23/02/2025 at 8:54 AM, turboplanner said: That doesn't mean a thing. Expand Does not to you, but it will to others 🤢
onetrack Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Quote Because the actions of some will invalidate any insurance policies, being paid out. Expand Not necessarily a true and correct statement. Public Liability insurance covers negligence of the policy holder. Insurance payouts may be refused, only if criminal acts are found to have occurred, or false declarations were made by the policy holder when the policy was issued. 2
jackc Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 Alleged withholding of evidence or telling lies to a Coronial Inquest is viewed very seriously, and an insurance company could invalidate a policy covering the organisation involved, and the people in it. 1
onetrack Posted February 23 Posted February 23 (edited) You're confusing insurance policies with a coronial inquiry. Telling lies to a coroner does not affect insurance payouts. The original mistake was issuing an RPC against CASA requirements. That was not a criminal act in itself, it was misinterpretation or error, which is covered under the policy holders insurance. The problems started when a cover-up was initiated to hide the error or misinterpretation of the regulations. Edited February 23 by onetrack
jackc Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 Different to what a Lawyer said to me, personal friend on a phone call. So I will just hurry up, and wait 😁
Roundsounds Posted February 23 Posted February 23 On 06/02/2025 at 1:20 AM, facthunter said: Records of the minutes must be retained by LAW, but it's very inhibiting to make them ALL public. It's not hard to envision the problems. Your liability as a member seems to be limited to ONE Dollar. OFFICE bearers have a greater exposure to risk and they have to be covered also. It's also a non profit Organisation, which is interesting. Nev Expand It will be interesting to see what happens to the various office bearers over time. I’m not sure whether you’ve read the Coroner’s report? It seems some actions by office bearers were not in accordance with documented procedures. The issues of concern to the Coroner relate to action / (inaction?) once the question of validity of the pilot’s RPC came to light within the organisation.
jackc Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 Regardless of who says what, the buck will stop at the end of it all, with whatever happens. Until then we can all cast our opinions, for what they are worth, in the meantime, right or wrong…….
jackc Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 On 23/02/2025 at 10:13 AM, Roundsounds said: It will be interesting to see what happens to the various office bearers over time. I’m not sure whether you’ve read the Coroner’s report? It seems some actions by office bearers were not in accordance with documented procedures. The issues of concern to the Coroner relate to action / (inaction?) once the question of validity of the pilot’s RPC came to light within the organisation. Expand Wonder what effect that has, on the RAA insurance policy?
facthunter Posted February 24 Posted February 24 It's informative to look up what the Purpose of a Coronial Inquest is. It's quite specific. Also what qualifications a Coroner must have. Nev 2 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now