Jump to content

Student Pilot

Members
  • Posts

    1,452
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by Student Pilot

  1. Yip, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba
  2. Manitoba initially then take an aircraft across to Quebec for a months spraying spruce budworm. After that back to the prairies for a couple of months. Haven't given up yet.
  3. I had lined up a job in Canada in mid May. They are still very keen, have all the required paperwork to both leave here and work there but currently a bit of a problem getting there. Maybe things will loosen up a bit between now and then, if not looks like I'll be wintering in the Homeshed
  4. You can see if stock are not acting normally, a flyblown blown sheep will walk/act differently to it's friends. You can see tracks through a fence if it's been pushed over, all from 500 feet. Big places it's very practical for stock/fence/tank inspection. Going for a fly for inspection of some sort would be a more valid excuse than going to your holiday house on the central NSW coast for the weekend
  5. 95:10 didn't allow strength to be built in. Unless your talking the likes of HummelBird (beat you toit Sailorman) there is not enough margin to build in a very strong design. Most 95:10 aircraft were overweight except the likes of the scout. The single seat Thruster was close to legal and a very strong design. A bloke bought a Scout round our area, vague memory it had a 2 cylinder Victa engine. At 3500' it was just too high to fly, he would roar up and down the airstrip with the tail in the air then balloon to about 3 feet then just settle back onto the ground. Probably the safest thing to happen.
  6. When the 95:10 machines were king most of the blokes round our area taught themselves to fly. A couple had a few lessons, when the 2 seat Thrusters came out it made things a lot safer.
  7. There are always exceptions ? Sorry to disagree again Kaz ? The likes of a Fletcher needs instant nose down once you have lost elevator/tailplane authority to keep the tail in the air. If you do that it stops shimmy, Fletchers are prone to shimmy with no dampener. In the olden days a bloke checked me out in a Fletcher, he used to say "Three point all the time", that was for a tricycle not a tailwheel!!, Goes against the grain, touchdown nose high then when the nose starts to drop pole forward and hold pressure to stop shimmy. I agree with your tricycle landings, nose high. Yes for absolute short as you can, fence at the end, use power, nose high and three point (back to tailwheel again). As usual there are several ways to do things, none more right than others. As long as we can get the aerial chariots onto the ground without too much damage all good ? I have a few streakers excuse stories "Seemed like a good idea at the time", one of those involved an Auster, a VERY short paddock and a samurai sword. I'm not sure about the statute of limitations so I might just put that in my version of I learned about flying from that, about 25 chapters so far.........?
  8. They used to say he who teaches himself to fly has a fool for an instructor. In the olden days of 95:10 a few did do just that, taught themselves to fly.
  9. Nev, only about half a knot difference between three point and tailwheel low wheeler, I recon buggar all difference in landing distance between the two. If you come roaring in fly it on with the tail high it will take more runway.
  10. Kaz, watch working AG pilots who fly for a living, they wheel it on. That's anything from Pawnee to 802 Air Tractor. Working all day on super in a Beaver (none left in Oz now on super) you would always wheel it on. A well flown tailwheel low wheel landing takes no more ground than a 3 pointer. I will agree it's easier to 3 point Austers and Tigers, some of the lighter stuff like Avids and Thrusters are easier to land three point as well. While I have never flown a Spitfire an Air Tractor 802 with 1700 Shp and narrow track I think would be as challenging, usually wheel them on. There are always if buts and maybe's.
  11. Yeah but what about the aliens?
  12. Most of us are old enough to remember the fuel crises of the 70's, that was a minor glitch compared to this virus crises. Then when they said there was only enough fossil fuel left in reserves to last 30 years, 4 cylinder cars were all the rage and you could buy a low milage Ford LTD for $300. If things get as bad as people are saying then there will be a lot of stuff sold/traded or even abandoned. Look at the sub prime crises, houses were just walked away from with money owed being many times the value of the building. People who owe a lot of money are in for some pain. I see a property developer asking a restaurant owner for his months rent of 64k (how can you make any profit paying that a month!!), there are many examples of pressure being put on people to pay rent. When people can't afford rent/food, hobbies will cease to be a pastime. If this crises goes as long as they say then there will be a lot of cheap aircraft.
  13. But what happens if we get an alien invasion while the aircraft is on the conveyor belt? That's just as relevant as the original question.
  14. Agreed KG, no fly.
  15. When it all boils down, you just fly the aircraft. It helps to know a wee bit of the science behind it but ultimately you need the stick time. Fly as much as you can, get somebody who knows what they are doing to help you train. It's not that hard.
  16. Even some government officials are saying this dept won't have to be repaid, same as wartime dept. Country and international economics do not compare/equate to household budgeting, no matter what some say with an Austrian accent.
  17. That's good. Usually after a long drought there is a rash of accidents, that's maybe the 4th I've heard of in the last month or so.
  18. Have you been watching me land?
  19. Are they are saying 18 months before effective vaccine?
  20. Brave, looks like it hit pretty hard.
  21. No idea what you mean Nev? Do you mean all can train low level? Or all should?
  22. A private PC9?
  23. Interesting how they call Trumps lies untruths now or falsehoods, they are bloody lies. He is clearly saying stuff that is not true, thereby a lie.
  24. The premise is the aircraft is in a stationary position (Hence no airflow over the wing) on a moving conveyor belt. If you power up the aircraft it will then accelerate to take off speed thereby getting airflow over the wing, the aircraft is no longer stationary relative to it's resting position and has a normal take off roll. An aircraft cannot fly without airflow over the wing. The only video I have seen was the Mythbuster rubbish where they accelerated on a moving belt being towed by a car or something. The aircraft powered up and did a normal takeoff while the car pulled the rug out. The aircraft moved and took off normally, it was a Zenith or similar and had a very slow take off speed anyhoo.
×
×
  • Create New...