damkia

CAR 233, 234, 235, 239, 244, 252A, 262, would be a good starting point. Whilst not explicitly stated that you have to carry them, it makes sense that you should be able to show evidence of doing the flight planning and have documentation of such on hand per the regs.

If you were doing the right thing in the first place you wouldn't even be having that conversation. Maybe this is what they are trying to instill in people - that they ARE around and ARE checking, so it would be advisable to get YOUR airmanship in order. You can't blame them for your lack of preparation.

If the purpose is to improve safety compliance then it may not be a bad thing. I suspect it is to keep an eye on RA-Aus compliance and checks too - to see if they are up to scratch in discharging their delegated duties. If too many planes and pilots are not compliant with the rules and regs, then it would be viewed as a more systemic issue better approached higher up than with the pilots concerned. It does sound like another round of more "on the ground" audits may be occurring.

North Qld Newsagents are very slow - we just got the edition that contained a story about some guy named Wright who invented something that may have a future.

Could it be to follow up with the training organisation that you used to ensure they are actually covering the requirements with sufficient depth and importance in their training? That would be my first impression, if you were not actually penalised, and they implied that it was a form of audit. Audits are used to capture what is going wrong, not necessarily to punish who is doing it wrong. It is more of a "systems approach" to fixing problems.

Devalued post. Was three Bobs worth, now only worth one Bob......... Price of Bobs must be equal to the price of gold...

So you have fixed the known knowns, and most of the unknown knowns. All that remains is to fix the remainder of the unknown knowns and all of the unknown unknowns..... Happy Valley awaits........

So, how is the old guy's Happy Valley stay going?

Such a pity we don't have a "green with envy" smilie..... Looks like a fun trip...

"- Rotorcraft Usergroup Forum - Powered Chutes etc Usergroup Forum - Gliders and Soaring Aircraft Usergroup Forum - Warbirds, Vintage and Classic Aircraft Forum - Aerobatics Forum - Rotary Wing Usergroup Forum - Flying Model Aircraft Usergroup Forum", and most GA? All <500post under "Miscellaneous" as a similar sub category structure to RA/GA types, as they are not that popular/frequented. If they become more used you could pop them out into their own primary category.

..........not if it is made of unobtainium.

So Ian, How is your hired help's treatment going at Happy Valley? ( )

2:01 pm Anxiety begins with incompatible OS and database 7:48 pm System administrator appears to have aged 10 years in one day, caffeine infusion by intravenous drip commences. 3:52 am Ambulance and police called to attend a disturbance from within a house by a psychotic individual screaming obscenities and verbally threatening to kill something/someone. On arrival a second person seen to be cowering in a foetal position in the corner of a room with parts of a server scattered all over the floor. Two weeks later: Happy Valley treatment is going well.... ________________________________________________________ Seriously, all the best with the upgrade

now there's a name you can trust...... "G'day mate. I'm looking for Sum Yung Guy..." "What is his name?.."

We do have a perpetual motion machine in our house....

"NO WUZZU'S" also needed.

So will we be able to copy the Chinese version and make it less reliable? (just kidding..) Seriously, looking forward to seeing the end result.

How does it compare with the infinite impossibility drive? This too allows travel instantaneously to any part of the galaxy - No plane needed, only a cup of strong tea...

.....and knows how to "Hitchhike"

Could it indicate "European" indicating it complies with the Euro regulations (JAR-LSA), and may be undergoing homologation for Australian release?

"Lacks Suitable Administration" "Lives Seriously Altered" "Less $ AUD" "Low Safety Awareness" "Leaves Sour Aftertaste"

In legal jargon "shall" or past tense "should" is a legal imperative. It is equal to common usage of "must". I can't get over the possibility that CASA were not interested in some propriety manufacturers screen sizes, more an equivalent size to the current format (A5). If you're in the minimum screen size, your in, if not, you're out.

210 x 148 is A5 http://www.papersizes.org/a-paper-sizes.htm And no, your iPad Mini will not cut it as your PRIMARY source of data, but OK as secondary, noting that the measurements were given as minimums. What they're saying is A5 minimum size not approximately (up to) A5.

I thought is was quite clear, actually. The way I read it is the PRIMARY source of data must adhere to the minimum size to be legal (257mm/10.1"). A SECONDARY source on a smaller device is also acceptable in the event of the failure of the PRIMARY device and for use in calculations. There is no avenue for using a small device as the PRIMARY source of data.