Jump to content

pylon500

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,411

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

 Content Type 

Everything posted by pylon500

  1. pylon500
    Personally I would stay away from hoping to achieve LSA status. That said, if this is 472kg MTOW, it fits 19-xxxx. Not sure why people want to build/fly 'Walter Mitty' machines like this, and carry passengers? I figure, if you want a two seater, build a two seater Just me photoshopping again although some of my initial drawings here; https://plus.google.com/photos/113292981019876413104/albums/5212775815502683841/5424354393046479058?banner=pwa
  2. pylon500
    Was required to send photographic evidence of MTOW and 'Unsafe Aircraft' placards on instrument panel. Supplied on 07/12/12. Nothing yet........ Should point out that in the past, when doing a new rego (the above is not) you were supplied with an 'Unsafe Aircraft' sticker and told to affix prominently. No mention was made with regards to photographing said placard (or others required placards), and sending in to complete rego. The inspector merely needed to observe the owner sign the form, that said placards were in place......
  3. pylon500
    Video #2 & 3 are typical two stroke failures, reasonably abrupt and total. Not sure what's going on with the engine in video #1, it loses power, but sounds to be running all the way to the ground? Maybe not a two stroke? As for the impact, he probably got caught by windshear down between the trees. Will Cathy ever talk to him again??! That look, OUCH.
  4. pylon500
    I started doing some drawings for something a bit bigger, but I don't see myself having any time to do anything in the foreseeable future:no: As for the photo, unfortunately yes, photoshop. Just trying to inspire myself while playing with CAD Truth is, (and looking at your avatar) I am more likely to build the Hurricane I started drawing a few years back. https://plus.google.com/photos/113292981019876413104/albums/5212775815502683841/5315228105331359986?banner=pwa
  5. pylon500
    It used to be the norm, and taught by instructors, until the Human Factor thing came in. Now, as long as we've had a good nights sleep, and haven't been smoking too much and can make psychobabble quotes, pilots can do pretty much what they want....
  6. pylon500
    Mustangs, mustangs, mustangs everywhere! Seems there's a good choice of scaled mustangs available now (working up from small); W.A.R. Mustang 53% http://www.waraircraftreplicas.com/ Falconaravia P51 66% http://www.falconaravia.com/ F.E.W. Mustang 66% http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FEWbuilders/ Stuart Mustang 70% http://www.seas.ucla.edu/~osmith/s51/ Thunder Mustang 74% http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papa_51_Thunder_Mustang Loehle 5151 75% http://www.loehle.com/MustangKit.htm Titan 51B & D 75% http://www.titanaircraft.com/t-51d.php Jurca Mustang 77% http://www.marcel-jurca.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=191&Itemid=238&lang=en And the latest offering, from Germany; Scalewings FK 51 70% http://www.scalewings.com/mu%20specifications%20englisch.htm There are also a couple of places set up to make 100% replicas of p51D and B models. Don't think anyone has done a Hawker Tempest yet.....
  7. pylon500
    As mentioned earlier, different carbi installations can have different effects. If not using the pre-carb plenum chamber, I think Rotax supplies small springs and tabs to support the weight of the carbi across the manifold rubber. I have seen older carbi rubbers cause leakage as the steel mounting plate moulded within starts to rust.
  8. pylon500
    OK, I see where you are coming from. The nearest we (ultralights) get is more like 'Approved' in the 19-xxxx class. Hopefully, these are L-4's and or LAME's, but I put to you an interesting observation, having worked in GA for nearly 30 years... The people with the most knowledge of aircraft design, ie Reg35 Aeronautical Engineers, very rarely actually build their own aircraft !?
  9. pylon500
    Don't tell everyone lest the management realise the laundry is there as well and remove it! In all fairness though, I feel that most of the overall problem stems from a failed interaction between the 'Office' and aircraft owners/importers with regard to poor paperwork handling. I feel CASA should really have put in some junior 'checker' for 12 months after the first failure to be sure that ALL details were included in registration paperwork before accepting. This may have slowed down many rego's a week or so, but everything would then be 100% compliant, and we wouldn't have the $h!‡ fight that's going on now. EDIT-{Italics} I thought that bit of the sentence, but didn't type it (or check it)
  10. pylon500
    Just answering off the cuff here, but when I designed and built my second ultralight about 18 years ago (AUF), the 'inspector' (who was actually a CASA mate!) watched me do the inspection, advising if he thought I missed something. The idea was that the inspection was overseen, but the final responsibility rest with me, the builder. The SAAA system had an out side inspector taking all the final responsibility for your work!? As for, When talking about 'amateur built' ultralights (19-xxxx), they are not certified, that's the whole point. If someone decides to improve (why would you make something worse?) a plan/kit/finished homebuilt, then it is the designer/manufacturer's prerogative to diss-own the final product. Part of the amateur concept is learning about the technology, design, hand skills and aerodynamics of aircraft, if you just follow someone else's plans/kit/build, then you miss a lot of learning and just end up with ownership of someone else's aeroplane with your paint job.
  11. pylon500
    Unfortunately, this is the mindset driven by CASA. From my point of view, the L2 is signing off on a 'type specific', the type is Ultralight. If you try to make it any more complicated than that, your back to my earlier comment of pricing ourselves out of existence. Our whole being, as an association downwards, is to be affordable.
  12. pylon500
    Does this mean that years of writing convoluted, legaleese rules that spend more time referring back to other rules has bit them on the @r5e? Plain english is so much better......
  13. pylon500
    I know what you mean Steve. I used to visit many US Sites, and was a little concerned at the lack of English skills shown. Sometimes I see similar incoherence here, and realize it is driven by frustration, I agree. There are good and bad L2's, we just need to maintain a dialogue between all, not so much to name and shame, but to let them know that they should try harder, not cut corners, realize this is NOT a way to make a living (unless you are really good) and that we do it for the enjoyment of working on aircraft. I did many years in the RAAF, and then as many years working at Bankstown. If we allow the L2 position to become as complicated as LAME, we have priced ourselves out of existence, just like GA. If you are an L2, take someone under your wing and teach them (but make sure you know what your talking about first!).
  14. pylon500
    There's merit in it, make the government look after our ability to fly simply and affordably. If they throw too much regulation at us, threaten them with ministers and the media. All the GA people pay once off payment licenses, don't have to belong to an organisation and have clear cut rules to follow. Do GA pilots need to submit a yearly flying report?
  15. pylon500
    3500 aircraft, 5 working days a week (261 days, no holidays), an average of 13 expired rego's per day, but maybe more than 2 days to do ONE rego? Things not looking good..........
  16. pylon500
    You should remember that when an L2 has to make an assessment on an older, or at least 'not perfect looking' plane, he is betting against his reputation and his worldly possessions that the aircraft can survive a ferry flight to a more in depth inspection. "She'll be right" inspections will eventually bite.
  17. pylon500
    Had a look at the RAAus site about 20 minutes ago (around 11:00pm est), and found this; My underline. (was going to use italics until I realised that quotes are already in italics!)
  18. pylon500
    Being a member of EAA, I regularly get news updates on what's happening in the US. I did not see a lot of mention of LSA problems over there before October 2011...... I think with the Yanks, it was a case of "That was spectacular, good thing we don't have that sort of problem over here,,,, or do we?"
  19. pylon500
    And that's only the recent list of 'upper echelon' movements. Some of the movements from the 'workface' level are worthy of note as well.....
  20. pylon500
    Can you find a link to the news item?
  21. pylon500
    That's an interesting date, if it ties in with an event in October 2011, then that is actually fairly quick action by CASA. I think maybe the magazine glossed it over for you....? I'm sure there's some clues here...
  22. pylon500
    I guess that should read, 'A pilot with too much money is soon flying a plane with a handle' !!
  23. pylon500
    Something about 'A pilot and too much money is soon flying more plane than he can handle?'
  24. pylon500
    Why does the thought "WE'RE SCREWED keep running through my mind? Aircraft tally; 1 x '24' (non LSA) aircraft still flying till April, 1 x '25' aircraft just expired (two weeks, no news), 1 x '25' aircraft under rebuild with lapsed rego (twelve months), but probably still wont be finished for another six months, 1 x '19' aircraft being re-engined so will need rego updated, 1 x imported '?' which may need some interesting paperwork (or become a lawn ornament!) and 1 x '28' restoration project that will be modified, hopefully before I die of old age. How many others out there are actually grounded/waiting for rego at the moment? More to the point, has ANYONE been re-registered in the last two weeks? I think the fuse may have been lit somewhere around October 20011.......... And the initials SB may have something to do with it?
  25. pylon500
    I think I found my first issue of this back around 1999, and after reading 'Kitplanes' and similar US magazines most of the time, this magazine showed a whole new list of aircraft NOT being sold from the US ! The 1999 issue, Covers a wide range of flying machines, not just Ultralights...
×
×
  • Create New...